Hi,
I've run into a technical issue with packaging CCL, which I describe
below. I don't know whether debian-mentors or debian-devel is a more
appropriate forum to post this - please advise if mentors is
inappropriate.
CCL was once in Debian, but under a different name, namely openmcl. I
be
Hello,
Quoting alberto fuentes (2012-07-17 00:54:32)
> Is it possible to have a generic git watchfile?
The watchfile system is designed to detect new tarballs, it is not
(yet?) capable of detecting $VCS tags. If your upstream forge offers
some way to download tarballs of the said tags, or even bet
Is it possible to have a generic git watchfile?
How about gitorius?
thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CALkubT5CThzfpRQrTCf7mL=zfkj6fghnbpvga
* Nathan Owens , 2012-07-16, 13:15:
On the no relo issue try putting DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk in the debian/rules file
Nope, this is neither required nor sufficient to fix this particular
problem.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-men
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo
> wrote:
> >
> > cd /usr/share/doc
> > find . -name copyright |xargs grep
> > 'http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/'
Le Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:35:03AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka a écrit :
> >
> Sorry, but not helpful.
On the no relo issue try putting DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk in the debian/rules file
Jakub Wilk wrote:
The current version appears to be at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/peg/peg_0.1.9-1.dsc
Lintian says:
P: peg source: package-lacks-version
Aliaksei Sheshka writes:
> I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package
> to use as a reference, which makes packaging for beginner even
> harder.
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/r/remctl/current/copyright
includes all of the Autoconf-based build system
Ben Finney writes:
> Aliaksei Sheshka writes:
>> 2) Which license do have auto generated files, like 'configure',
>> 'Makefile', *am', etc ?
> If there is no human creativity in the generation of the files, then my
> understanding of international copyright law is that such files are not
> subj
Hi Darren,
The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120716164519.ga10..
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 681704 by 681685
Bug #681704 [wnpp] ITP: homealoned -- Daemon that run personalized scripts when
is alone in the network
681704 was not blocked by any bugs.
681704 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 681704: 681685
> stop
St
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 677239 RFS: fractalnow/0.8.1-1 [ITP #673395] -- Fast, advanced
> fractal generator
Bug #677239 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: fractalnow/0.8.1-2 [ITP #673395] --
Fast, advanced fractal generator
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: fractalnow/0.8.1-1
The current version appears to be at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/peg/peg_0.1.9-1.dsc
Lintian says:
P: peg source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 7
W: peg: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/leg
W: peg: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/peg
blhc confirms that there's a prob
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Monday 16 July 2012 14:59:51 Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
>> I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to
>> use as a reference, which makes packaging for beginner even harder.
>
> Here's one that was not trivi
On Monday 16 July 2012 14:59:51 Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to
> use as a reference, which makes packaging for beginner even harder.
Here's one that was not trivial to write:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/pa
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:35:03AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> >
> > > I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package
> > to
> > > use
On 2012-07-16 10:35:03 -0400 (-0400), Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> Sorry, but not helpful. They only represent ~13% on nearly default
> Wheezy setup
[...]
While still not a perfect example, my weather-util package has
ISC-licensed and public domain components...
http://packages.debian.org/change
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
>
> > I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package
> to
> > use as a reference,
> cd /usr/share/doc
> find . -name copyright |xargs grep
> 'http:/
Hi Daniele,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:50:29AM +0200, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
> On 14/07/12 22:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >Just tell me if you are accepted
> >to Debian Science team (I'm not admin) and you have commited the
> >packaging. Meanwhile I have uploaded libgtkdatabox and I might
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to
> use as a reference,
cd /usr/share/doc
find . -name copyright |xargs grep
'http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/'
--
1AE0 3
Aliaksei Sheshka writes:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > The grant needs to be explicit, written, specifying exactly what
> > work is being licensed, in a statement from the copyright holder.
> > Ideally of the form:
> >
> > This is , consisting of . You may
> >
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Aliaksei Sheshka writes:
>
> > 1) should a package 'inherit' license from the original COPYING file if
> > not stated otherwise ?
>
> I don't know how to understand that sentence.
>
> If you are asking whether the mere presence of a ‘COPYING’
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi again Slavko,
Le 16/07/12 11:58, Slavko a écrit :
>> Don't give up, re-upload and try to send your RFS to maintainers
>> (team or other) who you think should be interested (not only to
>> debian-mentors). When I'm looking for a sponsor, I person
On Monday 16 July 2012 04:00:17 Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
> You still have to look through your debian/copyright file manually to
> check for any mistakes or inconsistencies, but at the very least, the
> syntax would be correct. There's also a DEP-5 parser that you can use
> to check the syntax af
Aliaksei Sheshka writes:
> 1) should a package 'inherit' license from the original COPYING file if
> not stated otherwise ?
I don't know how to understand that sentence.
If you are asking whether the mere presence of a ‘COPYING’ file, but no
explicit license grant, applies to files in the pack
Aliaksei Sheshka writes:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> > If you intend to package this software, then please retitle [bug
> > report #392333] to ITP and set yourself as the owner.
> I would like, but not sure yet I have skills *today*. Why I've build a
> package and u
On Monday 16 July 2012 11:58:23 Slavko wrote:
> Hi Thibaut,
Hi,
> thank you for quick reply.
>
> Dňa Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:30:35 +0200 Thibaut Paumard
>
> napísal:
> > It's not easy to get a sponsor, especially during a freeze (please
> > read my previous message from 15min ago entitled "Re: fre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thibaut,
thank you for quick reply.
Dňa Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:30:35 +0200 Thibaut Paumard
napísal:
> It's not easy to get a sponsor, especially during a freeze (please
> read my previous message from 15min ago entitled "Re: freeze policy -
> open
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 666243 !
Bug #666243 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: peg/0.1.9-1 [ITP] -- recursive-descent
parser generators for C
Ignoring request to unset the owner of bug #666243 which was not set
> owner 663916 !
Bug #663916 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 16/07/12 11:17, Slavko a écrit :
> Dear mentors,
>
> Dňa Sun, 15 Jul 2012 09:54:17 + (UTC) mentors.debian.net
> napísal:
>
>> Your package nbc all versions has been removed from
>> mentors.debian.net for the following reason:
>>
>> Your p
Dear mentors,
Dňa Sun, 15 Jul 2012 09:54:17 + (UTC) mentors.debian.net
napísal:
> Your package nbc all versions has been removed from mentors.debian.net
> for the following reason:
>
> Your package found no sponsor for 20 weeks
I was patient with my package, but i was no success to find th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 03/07/12 08:20, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> Le 03/07/12 01:41, Adam Borowski a écrit : Hi,
>
> We could agree on a usertag then, for instance:
>
> User: sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org Usertags:
> not-for-wheezy
>
> Using sponsorship-r
Hello Andreas,
On 14/07/12 22:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
Just tell me if you are accepted
to Debian Science team (I'm not admin) and you have commited the
packaging. Meanwhile I have uploaded libgtkdatabox and I might consider
moving the current state to Git to maintain some consistency.
I was
32 matches
Mail list logo
