Re: [Multiarch-devel] Proper upgrade path for lib32v4l-{0,dev}?

2012-07-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:01:28PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > currently my source package v4l-utils builds lib32v4l-0 and > > lib32v4l-dev packages on amd64. I'd like to get rid of them sooner > > than later and provide a proper upgrade path to multiarch > > packages. What's the best way to ach

Re: Who maintains manpages.debian.net?

2012-07-03 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:23:24AM +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > On 29/06/2012, Arno Töll wrote: > > On 29.06.2012 23:01, Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote: > >> today I had a look at a section 3 manpage for unstable. I was > >> offered an outdated version. Where is "the right place to com

Bug#680141: RFS: liblastfm/0.4.0~git20090710-2 [RC]

2012-07-03 Thread John Stamp
Yes, you're right. Thank you. An updated version is now on mentors. On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:42:28PM +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: > Hi John, > > On 03/07/12 22:52, John Stamp wrote: > > * URL : http://mxcl.github.com/liblastfm/ > > This URL leads to a 404. This URL is also lis

Bug#680141: RFS: liblastfm/0.4.0~git20090710-2 [RC]

2012-07-03 Thread Jonathan McCrohan
Hi John, On 03/07/12 22:52, John Stamp wrote: > * URL : http://mxcl.github.com/liblastfm/ This URL leads to a 404. This URL is also listed in the debian/copyright file. It was probably correct at one stage, but github have probably changed the link format since the last liblastfm upl

Bug#680141: RFS: liblastfm/0.4.0~git20090710-2 [RC]

2012-07-03 Thread John Stamp
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "liblastfm" * Package name: liblastfm Version : 0.4.0~git20090710-2 Upstream Author : Last.fm Ltd. * URL : http://mxcl.github.com/liblastfm/ * License :

Bug#673087: RFS: the-powder-toy/78.1-1 [ITP] -- Physics sandbox game

2012-07-03 Thread Aditya Vaidya
Hello Benoit, Thanks for reviewing my package, and I'm sorry about not committing the newest .orig.tar.bz2 in pristine-tar and pushing it. Upstream just released a new stable version today, and I've just committed the latest tarball to the 'pristine-tar' branch and pushed it, along with an updated

Bug#676722: RFS: ruby-kyotocabinet/1.32-1 [ITP] -- DBM-Ruby bindings

2012-07-03 Thread shawn
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 18:40 +, Bart Martens wrote: > Hello Shawn, > > I don't see ruby-kyotocabinet at mentors. What happened ? > > Regards, > > Bart Martens Have you taken a look at this package now? http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-kyotocabinet.git;a=summary -- -Shawn Lan

Re: Bug#679402:

2012-07-03 Thread Russ Allbery
Steven Ayre writes: > The rationale for putting it in a separate package is that it's possible > that in future there might be multiple versions of MySQL in Debian (MySQL, > MySQL Cluster, MariaDB, Percona etc). > MySQL is already packaged and I'm currently working on packaging MySQL > Cluster.

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-03 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:20:20AM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > Le 03/07/12 01:41, Adam Borowski a écrit : > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:06:25AM -0600, Paul Wise wrote: > >> Perhaps use wheezy-ignore for stuff that shouldn't be in wheezy? > > > > Isn't that completely contrary to that tag's us

Re: Bug#679402:

2012-07-03 Thread Steven Ayre
The rationale for putting it in a separate package is that it's possible that in future there might be multiple versions of MySQL in Debian (MySQL, MySQL Cluster, MariaDB, Percona etc). MySQL is already packaged and I'm currently working on packaging MySQL Cluster. This package lets you choose whi

Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Proper upgrade path for lib32v4l-{0, dev}?

2012-07-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:27:34PM +0200, Gregor Jasny wrote: > Hello, > > On 7/1/12 10:01 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: > > [ CC'ing ia32-libs maintainers for their opinion. ] > > Is the 20120616 or 20120701 version of ia32-libs supposed to go into Wheezy? Yes, 20120616 is already unblocked and 20120

Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Proper upgrade path for lib32v4l-{0, dev}?

2012-07-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:01:28PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > [ CC'ing ia32-libs maintainers for their opinion. ] > > On 2012-07-01 16:04 +0200, Gregor Jasny wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > currently my source package v4l-utils builds lib32v4l-0 and > > lib32v4l-dev packages on amd64. I'd like to g