Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.6.4-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL2+
Section
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jstest-gtk"
* Package name: jstest-gtk
Version : 0.1.1~git20090722-2
Upstream Author : Ingo Ruhnke
* URL
>
> Did you receive a notification for the comment that was added on this page ?
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/vavoom
no
i've added what was missing to the changelog (DEP-5, DEP-3,
wrap-and-sort,etc) i thought that kind of changes were not necesary to
be added to changelog, policy disagrees
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 02:48:02PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Yann,
>
> yannubu...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > any news about updating Mawk with the last upstream version?
>
> I don't think it can happen and be properly tested in time for wheezy.
> The new upstream version has significant cha
Dear all,
any news about updating Mawk with the last upstream version?
Regards
Yann
2012/5/28 Gert Hulselmans
> The Debian version of mawk has a lot of bugs (v1.3.3)
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mawk;dist=unstable
>
> Thomas Dickey (other dev than the original mawk dev)
Hi Yann,
yannubu...@gmail.com wrote:
> any news about updating Mawk with the last upstream version?
I don't think it can happen and be properly tested in time for wheezy.
The new upstream version has significant changes relative to the
packaged version and probably introduces some (minor or not)
Hi,
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
> [*] jwilk looked into the code and it /seems/ to me, the "bts"
> subscription does not contain control messages, whereas "bts-control"
> control does. Can anyone verify this?
I confirm this.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Get the Debia
Hello,
I prepared a new version, which keeps the changes in the rules minimal but
since upstream changed the building process a little bit, minimal changes were
needed to get it build. The massive changes of the copyright file were also
needed so that it would be machine readable according to t
Jonathan McCrohan scripsit:
> During a review of my updated figlet 2.2.4-1 package[1], it was
> discovered that the fonts directory still contains non-distributable
> files. An example of these files are the fonts/8859-*.flc files. These
> files contain the following paragraph: "Unicode, Inc. spec
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2012 16:14:14 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: stl-manual/3.30-13 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #667994,
regarding RFS: stl-manual/3.30-13 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:55:16PM -0300, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> hi
>
> after getting my first pkg in debian, i wonder how often should i
> prepare new revisions of it
I have no general answer to that, but I see that bug 674339 should be fixed as
soon as possible.
> and ask to potential spons
hi
after getting my first pkg in debian, i wonder how often should i
prepare new revisions of it and ask to potential sponsors to upload it
to the archive?
should i wait until the pkg has a many bugs? or each bug deserves an
upload?
thanks
--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Ian Chai wrote:
> Will Bob Marten's suggestion to replace the current fonts/8859-*.flc with
> ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/8859-3.TXT solve the problem,
> then? If so, I vote that we go ahead and do that.
Agreed. Let's allow a few days for FIGlet
On 28/05/2012 18:42, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
It would be great to have these issues solved so that figlet could
continue to be included in the next Debian release.
Will Bob Marten's suggestion to replace the current fonts/8859-*.flc
with ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/8859-3.TXT
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-back".
This upload would fix #663388 and #666334.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-back/gnustep-back_0.22.0-1.dsc
Changes:
gnustep-back (0.22.0-1) experimental; urgency=low
* New major upstream release.
*
[Please keep cc: list intact, so people don't have to subscribe to the
non-public figlet mailinglist]
Hi all,
During a review of my updated figlet 2.2.4-1 package[1], it was
discovered that the fonts directory still contains non-distributable
files. An example of these files are the fonts/8859-*.
On 28 May 2012 10:05, Bart Martens wrote:
> Please remove the package figlet 2.2.4-1 from mentors uploaded there at
> 2012-05-28 00:23, because having that package there is a form of
> re-distribution. http://mentors.debian.net/package/figlet
I have removed this from mentors.d.n now.
On 28 May
Hi Jonathan,
This seems an easy solution for figlet 2.2.4-1 :
ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/8859-3.TXT
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archi
Hi Jonathan,
Please remove the package figlet 2.2.4-1 from mentors uploaded there at
2012-05-28 00:23, because having that package there is a form of
re-distribution. http://mentors.debian.net/package/figlet
Note that you can still package figlet for Debian, if you want that, but then
the licens
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove figlet 2.2.2-1 from unstable, testing, stable and oldstable.
The package contains material that must not be distributed. One example is
that the file fonts/8859-3.flc contains a license which "specifically excludes
the right to re-distribute
Bart Martens writes:
> The package contains material that must not be distributed. One example is
> that the file fonts/8859-3.flc contains a license contains a license which
> "specifically excludes the right to re-distribute".
I filed a bug to keep track of this (#674844).
Ansgar
--
To UN
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/leechcraft/leechcraft_0.5.70+dfsg-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
22 matches
Mail list logo
