Processed: retitle to RFS: leechcraft/0.5.70+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- modular internet-client

2012-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 671731 RFS: leechcraft/0.5.70+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- modular internet-client Bug #671731 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: leechcraft/0.5.65+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- modular internet-client Changed Bug title to 'RFS: leechcraft/0.5.70+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- modular

Bug#673096: RFS: figlet/2.2.4-1

2012-05-27 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Jonathan, The information in debian/copyright is not complete. One example is that Edward B. Hamrick is the copyright holder of inflate.c and the license differs from the one in LICENSE. The package contains material that must not be distributed. One example is that the file fonts/8859-3.flc

Bug#673096: RFS: figlet/2.2.4-1

2012-05-27 Thread Jonathan McCrohan
[I've uploaded a new version 2.2.4-1 [1] to mentors.d.o] On 23/05/12 18:33, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jonathan McCrohan , 2012-05-16, 00:27: > .diff.gz of the previous package touches some upstream files. What > happened to this delta? (This should be documented in the changelog.) I've re-added it no

Bug#660314: package marked "needs sponsor = no" at mentors

2012-05-27 Thread Slavko
Hi, done. Thanks for pointing. regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#674789: marked as done (RFS: amavisd-milter/1.5.0-5)

2012-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 May 2012 18:46:38 +0200 with message-id <20120527164638.ge3...@harald-has.a-little-linux-box.at> and subject line Re: Bug#674789: RFS: amavisd-milter/1.5.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #674789, regarding RFS: amavisd-milter/1.5.0-5 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#674789: RFS: amavisd-milter/1.5.0-5

2012-05-27 Thread Harald Jenny
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "amavisd-milter" which fixes some small cosmetic issues for Wheezy. As I know that there are packages which need much more attention I tried to ease the review process as much as possible. Pac

Bug#673499: marked as done (RFS: libdumb/1:0.9.3-5.3 [NMU] -- enable hardening flags and multiarch)

2012-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 May 2012 16:14:38 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libdumb/1:0.9.3-5.3 [NMU] -- enable hardening flags and multiarch has caused the Debian Bug report #673499, regarding RFS: libdumb/1:0.9.3-5.3 [NMU] -- enable hardening flags and multiarch to be marke

Processed: retitle to RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP]

2012-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 661309 RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] Bug #661309 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: task-spooler/0.7.2-1 [ITP] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS: task-spooler/0.7.2-1 [ITP]' > stop Stopping processing here. Plea

Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] (new upstream)

2012-05-27 Thread Alexander Inyukhin
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 09:43:44AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Alexander Inyukhin writes: > > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "task-spooler" > > It builds those binary packages: > > > > task-spooler - personal job scheduler > > I'll have a look at this. > >

Re: Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] (new upstream)

2012-05-27 Thread David Bremner
David Bremner writes: > I'll have a look at this. I sent a separate mail about some warnings from cppcheck and compilation. These might not be blockers, but the following is, your package currently violates policy 10.1 Two different packages must not install programs with different function

hardening with non-C compilers

2012-05-27 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi all, I am currently working on including the last necessary changes into my package Winff before the freeze. Although I already saw quite some traffic about hardening, it seemed (to me) to relate to C compilers. Of course I was wrong, but I have no clue where to start to figure out how to get a

Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] (new upstream)

2012-05-27 Thread David Bremner
Alexander Inyukhin writes: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "task-spooler" > It builds those binary packages: > > task-spooler - personal job scheduler I'll have a look at this. Alexander, please fix the expiry date on your gpg key; either make a new key or bump t

Re: Kamailio for Debian 7 - deadline

2012-05-27 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 25/05/12 13:23, Victor Seva wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > 2012/5/25 Daniel Pocock : >> I can see some things very quickly: >> >> debian/control, build-depends: >> you need: debhelper (>= 9.0.0) >> and maybe: Standards-Version: 3.9.3 >> >> debian/compat >> must be 9 (not 8) >> >> debian/copyr

Bug#674477: marked as done (RFS: frogatto{-data}/1.2+dfsg-1.1 [NMU] -- 2D platformer game starring a quixotic frog)

2012-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 May 2012 03:50:36 -0700 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: frogatto{-data}/1.2+dfsg-1.1 [NMU] -- 2D platformer game starring a quixotic frog has caused the Debian Bug report #674477, regarding RFS: frogatto{-data}/1.2+dfsg-1.1 [NMU] -- 2D platformer game starri

Bug#665354: RFS: viennacl/1.2.1-1

2012-05-27 Thread Michael Wild
On 05/26/2012 05:53 PM, Bart Martens wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Why not 1.3.0 ? > http://viennacl.sourceforge.net/ > http://sourceforge.net/projects/viennacl/files/ > > Regards, > > Bart Martens > > > Hi Bart 1. I didn't know that 1.3.0 has been released. Must have missed it on the list... 2

Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] (new upstream)

2012-05-27 Thread Alexander Inyukhin
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "task-spooler" * Package name: task-spooler Version : 0.7.3-1 Upstream Author : Lluís Batlle i Rossel * URL : http://vicerveza.homeunix.net/~viric/soft/ts/ * License : GPLv2+ Section : mis

Re: RFS: flashcache

2012-05-27 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 27.05.2012 10:18, Liang Guo wrote: > Do you still use it ? to some extent: yes. I was using it mostly as a file system read cache but I found kFreeBSD + ZFS does a much better job. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.a

Re: RFS: flashcache

2012-05-27 Thread Liang Guo
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 09:32:14AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > Hi, > > On 27.05.2012 08:12, Liang Guo wrote: > > When the new package is ready, I'd like to sponsor your package. > > I have currently no intentions to maintain flashcache anymore and > everyone else interested to pick it up may do so.

Re: RFS: new powertop version

2012-05-27 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 26.05.2012 20:11, Julian Wollrath wrote: >> Also, I'm not sure about new upstream releases via NMU. Have you offered to >> co-maintain ? > No I have not, because I was under the impression, that it is not possible > for > a non Debian developer to co-maintain a package. But if this impre

Re: RFS: flashcache

2012-05-27 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 27.05.2012 08:12, Liang Guo wrote: > When the new package is ready, I'd like to sponsor your package. I have currently no intentions to maintain flashcache anymore and everyone else interested to pick it up may do so. The package was ready to use in November, so updating it to a newer vers