Re: What is the best way for disabling a service from another package ?

2012-05-04 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 04/05/12 23:55, Charles Plessy a écrit : > Dear all, > > I am porting to Debian a package that uses dpkg-divert in its maintainer > scripts to disable a service provided by another package, by moving out the > other package's upstart script. > > I can keep the commands as they are, since the t

What is the best way for disabling a service from another package ?

2012-05-04 Thread Charles Plessy
Dear all, I am porting to Debian a package that uses dpkg-divert in its maintainer scripts to disable a service provided by another package, by moving out the other package's upstart script. I can keep the commands as they are, since the target package does not exist in Debian, but this made me c

Bug#671403: RFS: python-lzo/1.08-1 [ITP] -- Python bindings for the LZO data compression library

2012-05-04 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Mehdi Abaakouk , 2012-05-03, 22:26: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-lzo/python-lzo_1.08-1.dsc Have you forwarded the patch upstream? Wouldn't it make sense to omit the "download/" part from the Homepage field? Since the licenses for debian/ directory and for the rest o

Bug#671492: RFS: sstp-client

2012-05-04 Thread Eivind Naess
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsorship for my package "sstp-client" Package Name    : sstp-client Version         : 1.0.7 Upstream Author: Eivind Naess URL            : http://sstp-client.sourceforge.net License    : GPLv2+ Programming La

Bug#668076: reSIProcate packages RFS

2012-05-04 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 10/04/12 11:34, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:35:18AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> >> On 09/04/12 10:41, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: Hi, I've recently filed an RFS for reSI

Bug#671476: RFS: omphalos/0.99.3-3 [ITP] -- network enumeration and domination

2012-05-04 Thread nick black
Gergely Nagy left as an exercise for the reader: > reassign 671476 sponsorship-requests > severity 671476 wishlist > thanks Thanks, Gergely. I had intended to convert to wishlist (reportbug doesn't appear to allow changing severity once set in an initial report). I hadn't noticed the (multiple) sp

Bug#671476: RFS: omphalos/0.99.3-3 [ITP] -- network enumeration and domination

2012-05-04 Thread Gergely Nagy
reassign 671476 sponsorship-requests severity 671476 wishlist thanks nick black writes: > Package: rfs > Severity: normal When filing RFS bugs, please follow the guidelines[1], and file it against sponsorship-requests, with the appropriate severity (wishlist for new packages). I have reassigne

Processed: Re: Bug#671476: RFS: omphalos/0.99.3-3 [ITP] -- network enumeration and domination

2012-05-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 671476 sponsorship-requests Bug #671476 [rfs] RFS: omphalos/0.99.3-3 [ITP] -- network enumeration and domination Warning: Unknown package 'rfs' Bug reassigned from package 'rfs' to 'sponsorship-requests'. Ignoring request to alter found