Re: Reupload after deletion on mentors

2012-03-30 Thread Daniel Stender
On 30.03.2012 16:55, Stephen M. Webb wrote: > The simplest solution to fixing a partially-uploaded package is to make > sure you're using the FTP protocol in dput instead of the HTTP protocol. > The program that processes the upload queue will wait for the .dsc file > to appear in the file transfe

Re: Reupload after deletion on mentors

2012-03-30 Thread Stephen M. Webb
On 03/30/2012 09:11 AM, Daniel Stender wrote: > On 30.03.2012 12:00, Vincent Hobeïka wrote: >> On Friday 30 March 2012 11:24:48 Daniel Stender wrote: I have encountered >> the same problem. In >> fact, your upload has been taken into account and is somewhere in the queue. > > Yes I know that ther

Re: Reupload after deletion on mentors

2012-03-30 Thread Daniel Stender
On 30.03.2012 12:00, Vincent Hobeïka wrote: > On Friday 30 March 2012 11:24:48 Daniel Stender wrote: I have encountered the > same problem. In > fact, your upload has been taken into account and is somewhere in the queue. Yes I know that there is an upload queue that is no problem (it takes time

Re: Reupload after deletion on mentors

2012-03-30 Thread Vincent Hobeïka
On Friday 30 March 2012 11:24:48 Daniel Stender wrote: > Hi guys, Dear Daniel, I have encountered the same problem. In fact, your upload has been taken into account and is somewhere in the queue. You just have to wait some hours. HTH Best regards, -- Vincent Hobeïka signature.asc Descript

Reupload after deletion on mentors

2012-03-30 Thread Daniel Stender
Hi guys, I really don't have a clue: on the mentors site I've deleted a previously successful uploaded package, after that I've tried to re-upload it, but everything fails, http upload gives "403 Forbidden", FTP upload gives "533 Could not create file", and furthermore "The existing file may have

Bug#666221: RFS: bwctl/1.3-1 [ITP] -- bandwidth test controller

2012-03-30 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, [ I have no intention to sponsor this package. ] Raoul Borenius writes: > * License : custom license which is not considered free (see > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/02/msg4.html) > but upstream is apparently changing to apach