Le 05/03/2012 12:33, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libaio-ocaml"
I've looked at the git repository (037a448). It is written explicitly in
[1]:
"Do not close RFS bugs in debian/changelog."
but the bug you refer to in debian/changelog is a RFS bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 662632 glo...@debian.org
Bug #662632 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1 [ITP] -- OCaml
bindings for libaio
Owner recorded as glo...@debian.org.
> tags 662632 + pending
Bug #662632 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~r
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ibus-unikey"
* Package name: ibus-unikey
Version : 0.6.1-1
Upstream Author : Lê Quốc Tuấn
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ibus-unikey/
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "recoverjpeg"
* Package name: recoverjpeg
Version : 2.0-3
Upstream Author : Samuel Tardieu
* URL : http://www.rfc1149.net/download/recoverjpeg/
* License :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arp-scan"
* Package name: arp-scan
Version : 1.8.1-2
Upstream Author : Roy Hills
* URL : http://www.nta-monitor.com/tools/arp-scan/
* License : GPLv3
Sec
Your package also ftbfs when built twice in a row
>From my output:
| dpkg-source -b tpb-0.6.4
| dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)'
| dpkg-source: info: building tpb using existing ./tpb_0.6.4.orig.tar.gz
| dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory autom4te.cache
| dpk
Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2012 21:29:24 -0500
with message-id
and subject line this appears to be done
has caused the Debian Bug report #661498,
regarding RFS: burp/1.3.1-1 -- Simple cross-platform network BackUp and Restore
Program (new upstream release)
to be marked as done.
This means th
Howdy Prach,
I took the liberty of attempting to build your package with clang
(rather then gcc) as the compiler.
The package appeard to fail in my sbuild chroot, so I double checked
(since the error was not clear it was because of clang), and found that
using clang does, in fact, cause the confi
Benoît Knecht writes:
> retitle 662632 RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1 [ITP] -- OCaml bindings for libaio
> tags 662632 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi Goswin,
>
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libaio-ocaml"
>>
>> * Package name: libaio-ocaml
>>Version
Thanks for review.
manaplus updated to version 1.2.3.4
22 февраля 2012, 05:23 от Paul Wise :
> Here is another review of manaplus:
>
> If you contact upstream as a result of this review, please point them
> at these two pages:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
> http://www.freedesktop.or
Hi Ansgar,
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:52:56 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt
wrote:
> You do not include the full license text for src/glext.h in the
> copyright information.
>
> Have the patches been forwarded upstream?
>
> You use debhelper compat level 9, so why don't you build-depend on
> debhelper (>=
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Stefano Karapetsas
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Il 2012-02-15 20:35 Andrew Starr-Bochicchio ha scritto:
>
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>> Thanks for working on this. trash-cli is a very useful package, and
>> it's always depressing when an upstream maintainer has to discourage
>>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 662026 moreinfo
Bug #662026 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: shotdetect/1.0.86-1 [ITP] -- scene
change detector
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #662026 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Hi Javier,
thank you for your sponsorship :-)
Hi Stefano,
I'm happy to sponsor trash-cli. However, it's been a while since you
sent this RFS and two things have happened: new standards-version and
the package has been removed from the archive[0]. I tried to prevent
it
but it was already to
Hi Andrew,
Il 2012-02-15 20:35 Andrew Starr-Bochicchio ha scritto:
Hi Stefano,
Thanks for working on this. trash-cli is a very useful package, and
it's always depressing when an upstream maintainer has to discourage
Debian users from using the packaged version due to it being
old/containing bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 662632 RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1 [ITP] -- OCaml bindings for libaio
Bug #662632 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1 [ITP] -- OCaml bindings for
libaio' from 'RFS: libaio-ocaml/1
retitle 662632 RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1 [ITP] -- OCaml bindings for libaio
tags 662632 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libaio-ocaml"
>
> * Package name: libaio-ocaml
>Version : 1.0~rc1
>Upstream Author : Go
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 662632 wishlist
Bug #662632 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
662632: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libaio-ocaml"
* Package name: libaio-ocaml
Version : 1.0~rc1
Upstream Author : Goswin von Brederlow
* URL :
Here is an example:
version=3
http://code.google.com/p/bullet/downloads/list?can=1 \
.*/bullet-(\d[\d\.]+)\.(?:tgz|tbz|txz|(?:tar\.(?:gz|bz2|xz))|zip)
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> What happened to this service?
> I changed all my googlecode watch files to it and now it is broken:
>
> $ dig A googlecode.debian.net +short
> googlecode.debianit.it.
>
> $ dig googlecode.debianit.it +short
>
> $
There is no reason to use
Am 28.01.2012 15:06, schrieb Christian Welzel:
Am 28.01.2012 14:25, schrieb Patrick Matthäi:
has someone a working debian/watch for files on code.google.com?
My old lines do not work anymore since an longer time, e.g.:
Take a look at this:
http://googlecode.debian.net/
What happened to th
Hi Enas,
Enas Gianni wrote:
> I made a new upstream release available at
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/nauticalmanac/files/
> because I had some problem with the previous release as
> detailed with bug #662221, I made some fixes and I closed all the bugs
> in the Changelog file.
> Hope all th
Hi everybody
I made a new upstream release available at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/nauticalmanac/files/
because I had some problem with the previous release as
detailed with bug #662221, I made some fixes and I closed all the bugs
in the Changelog file.
Hope all the problems was solved and I
24 matches
Mail list logo
