Hi Neutron,
You may also versioned build-dep on dpkg-dev (>= 0.16.1~)
for dpkg-buildflags --export=configure & hardening build flags.
Regards,
--
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Neutron S
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Olе Streicher wrote:
> I want to adopt the package "tktable2.9" but I found me confronted with
> some problems:
>
> 1. The package name contains the version, and since the upstream version
> is now 2.10, I would need to give a new name.
I'd suggest removing the ver
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "boot-repair".
* Package name: boot-repair - Simple tool to repair frequent boot problems
Version : 3.03
Upstream Author : Yann Mrn (yannubu...@gmail.com)
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/p/boot-repair/home/Hom
> I see, I guess this is a bit like khmerconverter and should be removed
> at some point? Maybe during the wheezy+1 cycle is the appropriate time
> to remove it?
In my opinion, I rarely use it and just only build the package as the
maintainer since I have no TIS-620 documents to handle with.
In th
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> It's not popular as it's still used by some group of users only.
> The xiterm+thai provides the TIS-620 encoding which now rarely used by
> Thai users, mostly superseded by UTF-8 but it's good as the later is
> the international standard.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "extsmail".
Package name: extsmail
Version : 1.4-1
Upstream Author : Laurence Tratt
URL : http://tratt.net/laurie/src/extsmail/
License : BSD/MIT
Section : mail
It builds this bin
> Any particular reason you sent this mail off-list? It would be good if
> you could resend/bounce it to the list, I prefer to do things in public.
It's my mistake, I should click on "Reply to all" instead. Forgot to
check the recipient address.
Resend to list.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:00 AM, P
Thanks Gregor, Thomas, Arno and Christian for your bits of wisdom. Summary:
I'll put
- the application files (which do not get modified) in /usr/share/shaarli
- the data/ directory in /var/lib/shaarli
- the cache/ and tmp/ directories in /var/cache/shaarli
I'll use the version name 0.0.32beta.
T
Thomas Weber writes:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:14:11AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> IIRC inline is only a hint--it's not guaranteed to
>> be inlined if the compiler thinks it's more efficient not to.
> That is exactly my problem. A newer compiler version might change the
> decision of the f
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:14:11AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:46:26PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have a question about an inline constructor and debian/symbols.
> > The code looks like this:
> >
> > class X {
> >
> > public:
> > X() { s
Hi Arno,
>> a) it's ok that the files reside in the debian directory ?
>> b) I missed a "dh_clean" (or pedant) somewhere ?
>> c) I have to delete those manually?
>
> I didn't actually try your source package, but it looks feasible. These
> files are created by a regular build process and entirely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Werner,
On 06.01.2012 21:24, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> a) it's ok that the files reside in the debian directory ?
> b) I missed a "dh_clean" (or pedant) somewhere ?
> c) I have to delete those manually?
I didn't actually try your sourc
Hi again,
I do have another question left.
I've just discovered that there are some files left in the debian directory
after package
creation, e.g.
debian/files
debian/policyd-weight.*
debian/policyd-weight.*.debhelper
debian/*.dephelper.log
debian/policyd-weight/
As source packages should not
* Ben Finney schrieb:
> Enrico Weigelt writes:
>
> > I really wonder, why you don't just track everything in a VCS
> > like git, set the Debian changes (to the source tree) ontop the
> > upstream release tag and simply add the control files ?
> > And when a new upstream release comes, simply reb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Christian,
On 06.01.2012 17:47, Christian Welzel wrote:
> Another approach would be to make an apache configuration package like
> shaarli-apache2. That leaves the choice to the user, and can force
> the installation of apache. And its very eas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06.01.2012 14:45, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
>> That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent
>> persons, maybe they can help you out.
Mark fixed a bug in dak which produced your faulty error message. The
problem was the
Am 06.01.2012 11:22, schrieb Arno Töll:
>> - Should I handle more than just Apache2 (other webservers)?
>
> That's up to you. At least, you should not depend on Apache and make
> sure it works fine without installing Apache. A dependency like:
>
> Depends: apache2 | httpd-cgi
Another approach w
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:12:41 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> I was told that the VCS cotnrol fields are not meant for "upstream" but
> only to point to servers on the debian infrasturcture to contain the
> packaging stuff.
s/on the debian infrasturcture//
> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors
Am Donnerstag, den 05.01.2012, 13:30 + schrieb Tony Houghton:
> The debian packaging and upstream are in one repository and I didn't
> want the contents of the release tarball to be inconsistent with what's
> in the package. I would also have to change the way I use git tags to
> generate a ve
Hi Arno,
> That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent
> persons, maybe they can help you out.
OK, thank you :)
Have a nice day,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06.01.2012 14:32, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> What's wrong?
That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent
persons, maybe they can help you out.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuP
Hi Thomas,
I've received an email from Debian FTP-Masters with the information that the
package got
rejected:
---
Reject Reasons:
policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [: global name 'MTime' is not defined]
---
What's wrong?
Thanks,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi Thomas,
> I'd add a file there, with lots of comments, and all the options that
> you can put in it. It doesn't mater if absolutely every options are
> commented out, the point is to document what can be done with
> useful comments.
>
> Maybe you can do that on your next upload?
done :) I've
On 01/06/2012 07:44 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> thanks for your helpfull comments.
>
>
>> What was in /etc/default/policyd-weight? Why aren't you using
>> it anymore?
>>
> It behaves like the current package in unstable/testing/stable.
> The file /etc/default/polic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Werner,
On 06.01.2012 13:32, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> I think that's the way to go. But where in source package should i put
> the file in my source package? I would then copy the file by postinst
> to /etc/default/policyd-weight ?
ty
Hi Arno,
> there is a slight disagreement between several positions within Debian
> regarding /etc/default/daemon options. That's confusing and something we
> should work on, but that needs to be addressed at a higher level.
Ok, i see.
> For you, in particular, you can choose either alternative
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Werner,
On 06.01.2012 12:44, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> What should we do here? Generate the file? Or don't take account of
> it in the init script?
there is a slight disagreement between several positions within Debian
regarding /etc/d
Hi Vangelis,
> I'm new and i want to start with any kind of help e.g. dd, maintainer or
> anything else.
> Thats because i need to learn first, to test my self
a good place to start on how you could help Debian is:
http://www.debian.org/intro/help
Cheers,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Thomas,
thanks for your helpfull comments.
> What was in /etc/default/policyd-weight? Why aren't you using
> it anymore?
It behaves like the current package in unstable/testing/stable.
The file /etc/default/policyd-weight isn't created but the init
script takes account of it.
/etc/default/po
Dear list,
I want to adopt the package "tktable2.9" but I found me confronted with
some problems:
1. The package name contains the version, and since the upstream version
is now 2.10, I would need to give a new name.
2. The package was orphaned since 2008 and is removed from unstable (and
testi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Emilien,
On 06.01.2012 00:13, Emilien Klein wrote:
> Those files constitute the application. I am thinking about placing
> those in /usr/share/shaarli
That's all right. Please note, you must not write anything to this
directory though after in
On 01/06/2012 01:14 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Your debian/init.d script shouldn't set the PATH at all.
> All the folders it is putting in PATH are already accessible
> in the default $PATH, so don't change it.
>
FYI, pabs don't agree with me, and think declaring the $PATH
is the way to go. So
32 matches
Mail list logo
