Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/06/2012 02:07 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "policyd-weight". > > * Package name: policyd-weight >Version : 0.1.15.2-1 >Upstream Author : Robert Felber > * URL : www.policyd-weight.org > *

Re: Advice on packaging a PHP application (ITP for Shaarli)

2012-01-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/06/2012 07:13 AM, Emilien Klein wrote: > By default, those directories are created in the same folder as where > the application files are (that would mean under /usr/share/shaarli). > Would /var/lib/shaarli be a better place to locate these folders? Remember that /usr can be a read-only file

Re: RFS: xiterm+thai

2012-01-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Neutron Soutmun wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for new version 1.10-1 (new upstream release) > of my package "xiterm+thai". Uploaded, thanks for your contribution. Some things you might want to look at: The package isn't particularly popular according to pop

Re: Advice on packaging a PHP application (ITP for Shaarli)

2012-01-05 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:41:43 -0500, Emilien Klein wrote: > > I'd go with 0.0.32~beta or similar (assuming that there will be a > > 0.0.32 release later) since ~ sorts before everything else. > The upstream author justifies the addition of "beta" to mean "be > aware, no guarantees, this could break

Re: Advice on packaging a PHP application (ITP for Shaarli)

2012-01-05 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Gregor, 2012/1/5 gregor herrmann : > On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:13:44 -0500, Emilien Klein wrote: > >> - The current version number is "0.0.32 beta" (including space) as >> written on the web page and in the source code, and "0.0.32beta" in >> the zipfile. As the version number in Debian can't cont

Re: Advice on packaging a PHP application (ITP for Shaarli)

2012-01-05 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:13:44 -0500, Emilien Klein wrote: > - The current version number is "0.0.32 beta" (including space) as > written on the web page and in the source code, and "0.0.32beta" in > the zipfile. As the version number in Debian can't contain spaces, > would you use "0.0.32beta", or

Re: Symbols and C++ inline constructor

2012-01-05 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:46:26PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: > Hi, > I have a question about an inline constructor and debian/symbols. > The code looks like this: > > class X { > > public: > X() { some code }; > } > > According to http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Inline.

Advice on packaging a PHP application (ITP for Shaarli)

2012-01-05 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Mentors and Apache Maintainers, I am in the process of packaging Shaarli (a delicious clone written in PHP) for Debian (ITP bug#654814). I would need someone familiar with packaging a [PHP] web application [for Apache] to guide me in the right direction. I have looked at the gallery and gallery

Symbols and C++ inline constructor

2012-01-05 Thread Thomas Weber
Hi, I have a question about an inline constructor and debian/symbols. The code looks like this: class X { public: X() { some code }; } According to http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Inline.html, this means that the constructor is inlined. So, can I mark such a constru

Help in packaging (Was: negative vote for maintainer Michael Gilbert)

2012-01-05 Thread David Prévot
Hi, Le 05/01/2012 14:18, W. van den Akker a écrit : > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 10:03 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> If you're lucky, you get a few >> responses from people saying they want to help but with no idea how to go >> about it, ... > > To be a little off-topic but... Well, this all threa

new 4 dd

2012-01-05 Thread vangelis
hi folks, I'm new and i want to start with any kind of help e.g. dd, maintainer or anything else. Thats because i need to learn first, to test my self. Osamu suggested to contact with you. Please help me to start. kind regards vangelis(gnugr) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...

RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-05 Thread werner
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "policyd-weight". * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-1 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binar

Re: RFS: aspsms-t (3rd)

2012-01-05 Thread Marco Balmer
Dear debian-perl, debian-mentors, On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:46:23AM +0100, Marco Balmer wrote: > Dear debian-perl, debian-mentors, > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:43:21AM +0100, Marco Balmer wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for finishing my perl package "aspsms-t". > > > > * Package name

RFS: mosquitto (new upstream version)

2012-01-05 Thread Roger Light
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mosquitto". This is an updated package for a new upstream version. The package is lintian clean. Thanks, Roger * Package name: mosquitto Version : 0.14.3-1 Upstream Author : Roger Light * URL : http://mosquitto

RFS: xxxterm

2012-01-05 Thread Luis Henriques
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xxxterm". * Package name: xxxterm Version : 1:1.10.0-1 Upstream Author : Several (Marco Peereboom ) * URL : http://opensource.conformal.com/wiki/XXXTerm * License : ISC, MIT, BSD-4-clause, BSD-3-clau

Re: RFS: roxterm 2.4.2-1 (was 2.4.1-1)

2012-01-05 Thread Tony Houghton
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:16:15 +0800 Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 01/05/2012 01:33 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: > > Unfortunately I just discovered a bug in the Build-Depends stanza, > > so please ignore version 2.4.1-1 and upload 2.4.2-1 instead. > > > If that's an issue in the packaging, why did you

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-05 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Thomas Goirand , 2012-01-05, 18:10: seems like this entry in debian/rules fixed it :) clean: rm -fr debian/files dh_clean *NO* !!! :) You really need the dh_testdir and dh_testroot calls. dh_testdir and dh_testroot act only as extra safety nets. Their use is certainly not

RFS: xiterm+thai

2012-01-05 Thread Neutron Soutmun
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for new version 1.10-1 (new upstream release) of my package "xiterm+thai". It builds those binary packages: xiterm+thai - X terminal program with Thai languague support To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

RFS: php-memcached (3rd try)

2012-01-05 Thread Sergey B Kirpichev
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "php-memcached". * Package name : php-memcached Version : 2.0.0b2-1 Upstream Author : Andrei Zmievski * URL : http://pecl.php.net/package/memcached/ * License : PHP 3.0.1 Section : php It builds php5-memcached - memcached exten

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/30/2011 06:30 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: > seems like this entry in debian/rules fixed it :) > > clean: > rm -fr debian/files > dh_clean > *NO* !!! :) You really need the dh_testdir and dh_testroot calls. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ.

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/30/2011 05:54 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: > With: > > # include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make > # clean: unpatch > clean: dh_testdir > dh_testroot > dh_clean build-stamp > > I get: > dpkg-buildpackage: source package policyd-weight > dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-05 Thread werner
Dear mentors, sorry that I've created two threads for my package. Please correspond on this thread to avoid confusion. All comments from mentors have been considered, the latest package is clean and awaits a sponsor :) thank you, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-05 Thread werner
Hi all, just check the package, this thread here is already done :) So it makes no sense to comment stuff that's already fixed. thank you, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org A

Re: RFS: roxterm 2.4.2-1 (was 2.4.1-1)

2012-01-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/05/2012 01:33 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: > Unfortunately I just discovered a bug in the Build-Depends stanza, so > please ignore version 2.4.1-1 and upload 2.4.2-1 instead. > If that's an issue in the packaging, why did you need to upgrade from 2.4.1 to 2.4.2, and why didn't you just do a 2.

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2012-01-05 Thread werner
Hi Ansgar, >>> And the version with unpatch and the include removed? From the error I >>> suspect you moved the dh_testdir one line up behind the clean. >> >> With: >> >> # include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make >> # clean: unpatch >> clean: dh_testdir >> dh_testroot >> dh_clean buil