RFS: xca - QT based x509 CA management tool (update to close FTBFS bug)

2011-10-24 Thread Tino Keitel
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xca". The package is already in Debian but has one bug. This is a FTBFS bug which I would like to get closed. * Package name: xca Version : 0.9.1~git7ffc768-2 Upstream Author : Christian Hohnstädt * URL : htt

RFS: eclipse-jgit

2011-10-24 Thread Jakub Adam
Dear mentors and java packagers, I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-jgit". * Package name: eclipse-jgit Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Eclipse JGit project * URL : http://www.eclipse.org/jgit/ * License : EDL-1.0 Section : jav

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-24 Thread Joey Parrish
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 17:23, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > I talked to the Alioth admins about it and it should be approved now. > Excellent. I'll get to work setting up the repo tomorrow. Thanks, --Joey

Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5

2011-10-24 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011, Joey Parrish wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 13:32, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: Have you created the repo yet?  I'm waiting on it to do the upload. Sorry it took so long to reply, I've been out of town for a few days. I have submitted a request to alioth for hostin

Re: RFS: python-pywcs

2011-10-24 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi Sylvestre, Am 23.10.2011 21:20, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: > I am willing to sponsor your package. However, I would like to know > first if you could update to move it into Debian Science. I could; however I tried to register a project for it (as well as projects for my other packages: wcslib, c

Re: RFS: l2tp-ipsec-vpn (updated package)

2011-10-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Werner, > > On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 22:02 +0200, Werner Jaeger wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1-2 of my package >> "l2tp-ipsec-vpn". >> [...] >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/l2tp-ipsec-vpn/l2tp-ip

Re: Alternative dependencies

2011-10-24 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, [...] > > Which would you recommend? I'm leaning towards xmltoman. Although it > depends on some perl packages they were all already installed when I > installed it; I guess anything with dh already has a lot of perl stuff > installed. xmltoman makes for a much simpler command than xsltproc.