Re: Dependency on lib32foo vs libfoo on amd64

2011-10-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Igor Pashev wrote: > I'm building a package with: > > 64-bits app (foo), > 64-bits lib (libfoo) and > 32-bits lib (lib32foo). Please use multiarch instead of doing that. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-

Dependency on lib32foo vs libfoo on amd64

2011-10-14 Thread Igor Pashev
I'm building a package with: 64-bits app (foo), 64-bits lib (libfoo) and 32-bits lib (lib32foo). foo is linked with libfoo, but dependency in DEBIAN/control is set to li32foo. What's the matter? dpkg 1.16.1 DH 8.9.8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a s

RFS: spice-vdagent (2nd try)

2011-10-14 Thread Liang Guo
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spice-vdagent". * Package name: spice-vdagent Version : 0.8.1-1 Upstream Author : Gerd Hoffmann * URL : http://www.spice-space.org/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : x11 It builds those binary p

dmaths: 30 days waiting for sponsor (package already in Debian)

2011-10-14 Thread Innocent De Marchi
Hi! I have updated the package dmaths to close a bug report (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620942) so as to fix some lintian messages. Now we just need someone encourage to review the package and upload the file. Best regars! I. De Marchi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

RFS: gentoo (New upstream version of a package already in Debian)

2011-10-14 Thread Innocent De Marchi
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gentoo". * Package name: gentoo Version : 0.19.12-1 Upstream Author : Emil Brink * URL : http://www.obsession.se/gentoo/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : x11 It builds those binary packages:

Re: RFS: ESO Common Pipeline Library

2011-10-14 Thread Ole Streicher
Am 13.10.2011 20:55, schrieb Julian Taylor: > On 10/13/2011 06:04 PM, Ole Streicher wrote: >> Am 12.10.2011 20:20, schrieb Julian Taylor: >>> Else the package looks nice, good work. >> >> I implemented all changes from you and Sylvestre and re-uploaded the >> package: >> > > it still does not buil

Re: RFR: devilspie2

2011-10-14 Thread Andreas Rönnquist
On 14/10/11 08:26, Helmut Grohne wrote: > >> I could (amongst other stuff) take some hints regarding the short/long >> descriptions. > > Both of your descriptions focus on explaining how devilspie2 does > things. A user first looking at your package wants to know what your > package does. Your sh

Re: Anybody to package new Bitten version?

2011-10-14 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Quoting "anatoly techtonik" : What does this testing implies? If there is a reference document on testing - somebody else may do this. This doc should exists even just to tell which parts can possibly go wrong as well as history of previous problems and mistakes. I'm running unreleased 0.6b3 for

Re: Anybody to package new Bitten version?

2011-10-14 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:20 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Quoting "anatoly techtonik" : >> >> It's 9 months since the patch to upgrade trac-bitten was committed to >> Debian repository and it's not packaged yet. Can anybody release it? > > Problem is: I can't (currently) test new versions proper

RFS: jabber-querybot

2011-10-14 Thread Marco Balmer
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a my new debian package: * Package name: jabber-querybot Version : 0.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Marco Balmer * URL : http://github.com/micressor/jabber-querybot * License : GPLv2 Description : Modular xmpp/

RFS: aspsms-t

2011-10-14 Thread Marco Balmer
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a my new debian package: * Package name: aspsms-t Version : 1.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Marco Balmer * URL : http://github.com/micressor/aspsms-t * License : GPLv2 Description : xmpp/jabber to sms transpor