Re: experimental or unstable

On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 09:01:52PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > * Tony Houghton [110903 17:32]: > > > There's a new release ready; should I switch back to unstable for it? > > Well, ask yourself this question: Do you think the upcoming release is > fit to be part of a stable releas

Re: Cannot install paraview package

paraview_3.10.1-5 has just been uploaded and building. It should fix an issue. Anton On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > Sounds like you got bitten by a transition: > > http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libav.html > > Until it gets rebuilt you will need to have testing

Re: RFS: spotweb (third version)

Hi Michael, On 09/03/2011 09:31 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > [...] > That's fine. Package reviewed, built, signed, and uploaded. > Thanks! Jan-Pascal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb

Re: RFS: spotweb (third version)

Hi Jan-Pascal, [...] > As far as I'm concerned, yes. The new version is on mentors, the .dsc is at > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spotweb/spotweb_0~20110903+gitab1d95b4-1.dsc > > By the way, I'm a Maintainer, and I've set the DM-Upload-Allowed fl

Re: RFS: spotweb (third version)

ndicate that this packaging is preliminary. I suppose the next version > will > be a releasable one!? > As far as I'm concerned, yes. The new version is on mentors, the .dsc is at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spotweb/spotweb_0~20110903+gitab1d95b4-1.dsc By the wa

Re: experimental or unstable

Hi! * Tony Houghton [110903 17:32]: > There's a new release ready; should I switch back to unstable for it? Well, ask yourself this question: Do you think the upcoming release is fit to be part of a stable release? If the answer is "yes" upload to unstable. If the answer is "No, but I'd like

Re: RFS: xxxterm

Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xxxterm". > > * Package name: xxxterm >Version : 1.518-1 >Upstream Author : Several (Marco Peereboom ) > * URL : http://opensource.conformal.com/wiki/XXXTerm > * License : ISC, MIT, BSD-4-clause, BSD-3-cla

Re: RFS: qmpdclient

Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qmpdclient". > > * Package name: qmpdclient >Version : 1.2.2-1 >Upstream Author : Voker57 > * URL : http://bitcheese.net/wiki/QMPDClient > * License : GPL-2+ >Section : sound > [...] This pa

Re: experimental or unstable

Hi, [...] > You're probably thinking if I'm making a new release already it can't be > that stable! But only one of the changes relates to something specific > to roxterm 2, and it's to make a new feature optional rather than to fix > a bug >

Re: RFS: presage (updated package)

Hi Matteo, [...] > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > Done. Thanks a lot for this update, Michael pgpHJU4dX8bKp.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: gkrellm-gkrellmpc

Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gkrellm-gkrellmpc". > > * Package name: gkrellm-gkrellmpc >Version : 0.1~beta10-2 >Upstream Author : Mina Naguib > * URL : http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/Client:GKrellMPC > * License : GPL-2 >Section

Re: RFS: libharu (updated package)

Hi, [...] > >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-1 > >> of my package "libharu". > >> [...] Looks good. Built, signed, and uploaded. Best, Michael pgpwxxdN84WF6.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: pidgin-twitter (updated package)

Hi Yabuki-san, thank you for your offering. please look after this package. On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 10:56:50PM +0900, Yukiharu Yabuki wrote: > I would like to upload the one. > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- Regards, dai GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B

Re: RFS: spotweb (third version)

Hi Jan-Pascal, > On my request, upstream has added an explicit LICENSE file detailing the > (BSD-3-clause) license. Up to now, the license wasn't in the source > package itself. I've also changed to packaging to use debhelper instead > of cdbs. > > The new .dsc is at > http://mentors.debian.net/d

Re: RFS: assimp (3rd try)

Hi, > Dear mentors, sponsors and fellow Debianistas, > > here is my third attempt to find a sponsor (or more reviewers) for my > package "assimp". > [...] Package built, signed, and uploaded. Will be sitting in NEW now. Best, Michael pgp3CYWHaluU9.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Cannot install paraview package

Sounds like you got bitten by a transition: http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libav.html Until it gets rebuilt you will need to have testing added to your sources.list. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org

experimental or unstable

The last release of roxterm went to experimental instead of unstable. TBH I forgot that I'd changed it to experimental at some point, but after release I thought perhaps it's just as well because of the major changes. However, I think this has resulted in few users noticing the new version and I th

Re: RFS: open-axiom

On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:34:23 +0400, Igor Pashev wrote: > > What about other architectures (i386, alpha, powerpc, etc)? > Do I need another sponsor? :-) > How much time does it take for package to appear in repo? > Other architectures will be built on the autobuilder network, all going well. Fo

Cannot install paraview package

Dear all, could someone please confirm there is something weird going on with paraview package in unstable: $ sudo apt-get install paraview The following packages have unmet dependencies: paraview : Depends: libavcodec52 (>= 4:0.6-1~) but it is not installable or libavcode

Re: RFS: open-axiom

Greate! Thank you. OA is uploaded to FTP. What about other architectures (i386, alpha, powerpc, etc)? Do I need another sponsor? :-) How much time does it take for package to appear in repo? 03.09.2011 16:37, David Bremner пишет: > On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 16:07:39 +0400, Igor Pashev wrote: >> I hav

Re: RFS: fizsh

Hi, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fizsh". [...] I've reviewed your package fizsh and have the following comments: - .orig.tar.gz differs from upstream: aclocal.m4 |4 configure | 328 ++--- 2 files changed, 147 inse

Re: RFS: pidgin-twitter (updated package)

Hi, Higuchi-san. I would like to upload the one. On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:24:16 +0900 deb...@vdr.jp wrote: > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- ++++++++++++++ Yukiharu Yabuki (矢吹幸治) I use Debian G

RFS: pidgin-twitter (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-twitter". The upload would fix Bug #625418: "ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror" * Package name: pidgin-twitter Version : 0.9.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Yoshiki Yazawa (@yazuuchi) * URL : http://www.honeyplanet.

Re: RFS: open-axiom

On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 16:07:39 +0400, Igor Pashev wrote: > I have upload new version without > "./contrib" and "./src/include/xpm.h". > > The latter is going to be removed in upstream, > that file is from very old Axiom version. > > "./contrib" is not used now and has unclear license mess: > "./c

Re: RFS: getstream

Hi! Hervé Rousseau writes: > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/getstream/getstream_20100616-1.dsc The orig.tar.gz downloaded from the website differs from the orig.tar.gz in your package: 1144dc0180cedb494f6c7826e994fc3bcf7eebe4 getstream_20100616.orig.tar.gz.website 1e4

Re: RFS: conque

Hello, This email is a reply to three emails, so please excuse the length. On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Please run lintian on *.changes file. That way lintian will check not only > binaries, but also the source package (and possibly more). DONE > debian/README.Debian: > -

Re: RFS: open-axiom

I have upload new version without "./contrib" and "./src/include/xpm.h". The latter is going to be removed in upstream, that file is from very old Axiom version. "./contrib" is not used now and has unclear license mess: "./contrib/texmacs/COPYING" says about GPL-3, but sources are BSDL or GPL (1

Re: Bug#466542: RFS: task-spooler

On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 12:07:59PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > David Bremner writes: > You can have a symlink to a socket somewhere else which can then have a > random name. In case the real socket is in a world-writable directory, > you also need to check that it is still your socket and wa

Re: RFS: python-visvis

* Torquil Macdonald Sørensen , 2011-09-03, 12:30: I have fixed these mistakes, reported the "upstream issues", and joined the DPMT. Does this mean that it is now OK for me to upload the package to the SVN archive, before proceeding to find a sponsor? Yes, you can inject the package to the team

Re: RFS: python-visvis

On 15/08/11 13:21, Jakub Wilk wrote: Disclaimer: I don't intend to sponsor this package. The following review is *not* comprehensive: * Torquil Macdonald Sørensen , 2011-08-15, 12:22: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-visvis/python-visvis_1.5-1.dsc Shouldn't it be "

Re: RFS: task-spooler

Hi, David Bremner writes: > - I have a vague memory of this being discussed before, but I can't >find the discussion now. As far as I can tell, there are several >ways in which the socket setup could be improved. > >- I don't really understand why the permissions on

RFS: openssn

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openssn". * Package name: openssn Version : 0.7-1 Upstream Author : Jesse Smith * URL : http://openssn.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL2 (code), CC0 (data) Section : games Description: m