Re: RFS: news (News - RSS Ticker)

2011-08-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin writes: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "news". > * Package name: news >Version : 0.5.3-1 >Upstream Author : Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin > * URL : http://www.newsrssticker.com/unstable-debian/ > * License : GPL >Sectio

Re: RFS: news (News - RSS Ticker)

2011-08-19 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "news". > >  * Package name    : news >   Version         : 0.5.3-1 >   Upstream Author : Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin >  * URL             : http://www.newsrssticker.com/unstabl

RFS: news (News - RSS Ticker)

2011-08-19 Thread Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "news". * Package name: news Version : 0.5.3-1 Upstream Author : Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin * URL : http://www.newsrssticker.com/unstable-debian/ * License : GPL Section : net To access furth

Re: Solving lintian warnings for multi-package roxterm

2011-08-19 Thread Russ Allbery
David Kalnischkies writes: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 00:58, Russ Allbery wrote: >> You can't use disappearing packages with Policy-compliant packages so >> far as I can tell, since it would require both packages provide the >> same /usr/share/doc directory and changelog file, which is a Policy >

RFS: dylandotnet

2011-08-19 Thread Dylan Borg
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dylandotnet". * Package name: dylandotnet Version : 11.2.7.4-2 Upstream Author : Dylan Borg * URL : https://launchpad.net/dylandotnet * License : GPL-3+ Section : cli-mono To access fur

Re: RFS: dfu-programmer

2011-08-19 Thread Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer
Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 14:50 +0200, Arno Töll a écrit : > Hi Rodolphe, > On 18.08.2011 14:11, Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer wrote: > > So the new upload is not a NMU anymore and it could be my first official > > package :) > > Here are a few comments about your package: > > * Please consider using a

Re: RFS: icecat

2011-08-19 Thread Andrew O. Shadoura
Hello, On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:04:44 +0200 Javier Sancho wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "icecat". i) What's the point of it, how is it different from Iceweasel? ii) Why doesn't your package use pre-existing XULRunner in Debian? -- WBR, Andrew signature.asc Description: P

Re: RFS: assimp (2nd try)

2011-08-19 Thread Jakub Wilk
* IOhannes zmölnig , 2011-08-19, 20:03: here is my second attempt to find a sponsor (or more reviewers) for my package "assimp". Was debian/TODO supposed to be included in the source package? :) libassimp2.symbols: has now demangled symbols for the C++, and normal symbols for C The package

RFS: assimp (2nd try)

2011-08-19 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
Dear mentors, sponsors and fellow Debianistas, here is my second attempt to find a sponsor (or more reviewers) for my package "assimp". since the main package description has not really changed much since yesterday, i will give you just a quick overview about what has changed. (full description c

Re: RFS: assimp

2011-08-19 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
On 08/19/2011 04:32 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> to resolve "libassimp.so.2" dynamically. > > But why? The Python code has hardcoded assumptions about the library > ABI, so you should open libassimp.so.2, not any other libassimp.so.N > (which ABI might be different). thanks, sounds like a good idea.

RFS: spotweb

2011-08-19 Thread Jan-Pascal van Best
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spotweb". * Package name: spotweb Version : 0~20110818+git9fcd44c4-1~pre1 Upstream Author : Spotweb URL : http://github.com/spotweb/spotweb * License : BSD-3-clause, some parts GPL, LGPL, MIT and

Re: RFS: assimp

2011-08-19 Thread Jakub Wilk
* IOhannes zmölnig , 2011-08-19, 15:45: pyassimp.errors.AssimpError: assimp library not found hmm, it worked for me...:-( trying to find words to ask you how and what, i think i found the reason: pyassimp looks for /usr/lib/libassimp.so which is only provided by libassimp-dev (which i most li

Re: RFS: assimp

2011-08-19 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
On 08/19/2011 03:34 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * IOhannes zmölnig , 2011-08-19, 11:30: >>> pyassimp.errors.AssimpError: assimp library not found >> >> hmm, it worked for me...:-( >> trying to find words to ask you how and what, i think i found the >> reason: pyassimp looks for /usr/lib/libassimp.so wh

Re: RFS: assimp

2011-08-19 Thread Jakub Wilk
* IOhannes zmölnig , 2011-08-19, 11:30: pyassimp.errors.AssimpError: assimp library not found hmm, it worked for me...:-( trying to find words to ask you how and what, i think i found the reason: pyassimp looks for /usr/lib/libassimp.so which is only provided by libassimp-dev (which i most l

Re: Solving lintian warnings for multi-package roxterm

2011-08-19 Thread Tony Houghton
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:51:11 +0100 Tony Houghton wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:41:33 +0200 > David Kalnischkies wrote: [Snip] > I'd rather keep the name "roxterm" for the GTK3 version if that's OK. > I don't really want the main package to be named after a library > dependency and have to re

Re: RFS: assimp

2011-08-19 Thread Jakub Wilk
* IOhannes zmölnig , 2011-08-19, 11:01: doing a quick stats on my system, i have 32 $(VER)+dfsg 28 $(VER)~dfsg 28 $(VER).dfsg 5 $(VER)dfsg 4 $(VER)-dfsg FWIF, do not ever use ".dfsg". See the dfsg-version-with-period lintian warning for rationale. I'd also avoid "-dfsg", because version number

Re: RFS: assimp

2011-08-19 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
On 08/19/2011 03:22 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Michael Tautschnig , 2011-08-19, 00:31: >> some missing copyright information > > DEP-5-enabled lintian (see bug #633779) also reports several issues: > > W: assimp source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright paragraph 20 copyright > W: assimp source: com

Re: RFS: assimp

2011-08-19 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 19.08.2011 11:01, schrieb IOhannes zmölnig: >> +dfsg would be preferable over ~dfsg, but you might have good reasons for >> your >> choice? > im using that because in the pkg-multimedia team (where i partake), we > use "~". > > doing a quick stats on my system, i have > 32 $(VER)+dfsg >

Re: RFS: assimp

2011-08-19 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi again, > On 08/19/2011 01:31 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > > > I'm wondering whether it would make sense to remove other cruft as well - > > basically contrib/ entirely and workspaces could go as well. And, well, I > > think > > might be a good idea, thanks. > when i did it, i mainly rem

Re: RFS: assimp

2011-08-19 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
On 08/19/2011 01:31 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > I'm wondering whether it would make sense to remove other cruft as well - > basically contrib/ entirely and workspaces could go as well. And, well, I > think might be a good idea, thanks. when i did it, i mainly removed the MUST (test/models_

Re: RFS: kbdd

2011-08-19 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:44:18PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi Stas, > > > The package is again available on mentors.debian.net website. > > Could someone please review and upload it if everything is ok? > > > > I've built, signed, and uploaded your package as-is. Yet the following iss

Re: RFS: icecat

2011-08-19 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Javier Sancho wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "icecat". > >  * Package name    : icecat >   Version               : 5.0.1-1 >   Upstream Author : Giuseppe Scrivano >  * URL                   : http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzi

Re: Solving lintian warnings for multi-package roxterm

2011-08-19 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 00:58, Russ Allbery wrote: > David Kalnischkies writes: > >> Sidenote: I am not sure why the usage of 'disappearing packages' was >> removed from the wiki as dpkg and APT support them in squeeze - at least >> in my eyes it looked like the holy grail to prevent maintainers

RFS: icecat

2011-08-19 Thread Javier Sancho
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "icecat". * Package name: icecat Version : 5.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Giuseppe Scrivano * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/ * License : MPL/GPL/LPPL Section