On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Olivier Girondel wrote:
> I included the FreeMono.sfd, COPYING and README files from the freefont
> package in the source tarball.
I don't think that was needed. Really you only need them in any
non-Debian binary packages that you make (for Windows/MacOS etc). Even
Hi William,
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 12:43 -0500, William Vera wrote:
> 2011/7/6 Kilian Krause :
> > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 18:23 -0600, René Mayorga wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:45:41AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Tim, are you agreed that William takes over or do you wa
(seems like my previous message didn't hit d-mentors)
El mié, 06-07-2011 a las 10:19 +0900, Charles Plessy escribió:
> I have uploaded john 1.7.8-1. I will send you the build log in private.
Thank you very much!
> Would you consider applying as DM or resuming your DD application ? It think
> th
Hello Joachim
Sorry for this. I will try to fix all this stuff as soon as possible.
I ran
lintian --pedantic xnoise_0.1.25-1_source.changes
and it didn't give me errors or warnings for the final version, which I
then uploaded. I must have done something very wrong, but I don't know
yet what it w
Please do not upload directly, i will upload git tree before under collab
maint and postthe final ppackage here.
It is more a rfc.
Bastien
Le 6 juil. 2011 15:14, "Bastien ROUCARIES" a
écrit :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:2011.04.12-1
of the package "autoconf-
Wolodja Wentland writes:
> Is get-orig-source called by anything or is it "merely" a nice target to
> have so life is easier for other maintainers and oneself when preparing
> new releases?
The latter. One could replace it with a shell script, but it's a
semi-standard because it's mentioned in
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 14:19 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Wolodja Wentland writes:
> > How stable is get-orig-source across releases?
> For a package where I was using a released tarball for the reasons described
> above, I would dispense with this target entirely and just use uscan to
> downl
Wolodja Wentland writes:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:53 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> [ ... ]
>> but for some other packages I want to use some of the files that are
>> generated as part of the upstream tarball release but aren't checked in.
> Ok, this is not necessary for me right now. Do you k
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:53 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Wolodja Wentland writes:
>
> > I've recently started to work on some packages and am not sure if I
> > follow best practices when packaging software from git repositories with
> > git-buildpackage.
> I do the following for OpenAFS (see t
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-latex".
* Package name: pidgin-latex
Version : 1.4.4-1
Upstream Author : Benjamin Moll
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pidgin-latex/
* License : GPL-2
Section : net
It builds these binary pack
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 19:02 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Personally I don't have any local branch, just remote branches. And when I
> need to do a bisect for example I will checkout temporarily one of the
> upstream dev branches. What I have is:
>
> origin => upstream repo
> alioth => a
Wolodja Wentland writes:
> I've recently started to work on some packages and am not sure if I
> follow best practices when packaging software from git repositories with
> git-buildpackage.
[...]
I do the following for OpenAFS (see the supporting scripts in the openafs
source package) based on
shuerhaaken wrote on 2011-07-06 12:54:
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
Unfortunately not! Here is my logging (packaging for testing):
N: Setting up lab in /tmp/sVt1potpnA ...
N:
N: Processing changes file xnoise_0.1.25-1_amd64 (version 0.1.25-1) ...
N:
N: Processing source
Le mercredi 6 juillet 2011 20:31:02, Joey Hess a écrit :
> Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:12:41PM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > > Does pristine-tar work if the upstream branch contains files which have
> > > been removed during repack?
> >
> > Unfortunately the dir
Am 27.06.2011 21:07, schrieb Kilian Krause:
> - Why you can't use the zip I don't see. You can easily repack and note that
> in README.source. Use the get-orig-source target in debian/rules for that
> and possibly use a ~debian version number. The ~debian is not neccessary
> though IMHO in t
shuerhaaken wrote on 2011-07-06 12:54:
> My motivation for maintaining this package is: I am the developer of
> this program and I'd like to see it in Debian. In the past I packaged
> this only for Ubuntu via ppa, but that is not the way it should go.
Until now I haven't seen any ITP "bug report
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:12:41PM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > Does pristine-tar work if the upstream branch contains files which have
> > been
> > removed during repack?
> Unfortunately the directory and the tarball must have identical contents.
That's not t
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libpar2:
* Package name: libpar2
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Peter Brian Clements
Francois Lesueur
* URL : http://parchive.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2+
Description : Li
Hi
2011/7/6 Kilian Krause :
> Hi William,
>
> On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 18:23 -0600, René Mayorga wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:45:41AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Tim, are you agreed that William takes over or do you want to remain as
>> > uploader/co-maintainer?
>>
>> Please le
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Oliver,
On 06.07.2011 18:23, Olivier Girondel wrote:
> This has been fixed, but I'm not sure what exactly the content of the
> Format: field should be.
please see [1] and that thread in general. Some people have different
understandings what to pu
Le mercredi 6 juillet 2011 17:52:31, Wolodja Wentland a écrit :
> Bonjour Thomas,
:)
[SNIP]
> >
> > There was a thread recently about using tarballs or tags on
> > debian-devel@l.d.o recently. No consensus was reached as it clearly
> > depends on your needs and probably also your tastes.
>
> Ye
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/29/2011 05:12 PM, David Banks wrote:
>
> wrt to debian/copyright file there are a few issues:
>
> * You might consider using DEP-5 as a best practice, this is up to you.
This has been fixed, but I'm not sure what exactly the content of the
For
Hi William,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:50:02PM -0500, William Vera wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 01:34 -0500, William Vera wrote:
> > -(snip)-
> >> I need make a package for x86emu.h or I can make some patch for this?
> >>
> >> I would ap
Bonjour Thomas,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 15:12 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Le mercredi 6 juillet 2011 14:38:36, Wolodja Wentland a écrit :
>
> First, thanks for posting your git workflow. It is for me very interesting to
> see different ways of dealing with upstream also using git.
No pro
Dear all,
this thread reminds me of a problem I had in a similar case.
When I track the upstream branch, merge it in the Debian branch, our commit
hook sends one notification per upstream commit on our packagers mailing list.
To reduce traffic, and to avoid confusion between changes made by the
Hi William,
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 18:23 -0600, René Mayorga wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:45:41AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> >
> >
> > Tim, are you agreed that William takes over or do you want to remain as
> > uploader/co-maintainer?
>
> Please let him a co-maint for a while, since he
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently started to work on some packages and am not sure if I follow
> best practices when packaging software from git repositories with
> git-buildpackage.
>
> My main point of confusion is that I don't really see the nee
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:2011.04.12-1
of the package "autoconf-archive".
It builds these binary packages:
autoconf-archive - Autoconf Macro Archive
The upload would fix these bugs: 214089, 568413, 572669, 584180, 593838, 622369
The package can be found on m
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:12:41PM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Does pristine-tar work if the upstream branch contains files which have been
> removed during repack?
Unfortunately the directory and the tarball must have identical contents.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Le mercredi 6 juillet 2011 14:38:36, Wolodja Wentland a écrit :
> Hi all,
Hi Wolodja,
First, thanks for posting your git workflow. It is for me very interesting to
see different ways of dealing with upstream also using git.
[SNIP]
>
> I know that I could just download the tarball from github an
Hi all,
I've recently started to work on some packages and am not sure if I follow
best practices when packaging software from git repositories with
git-buildpackage.
My main point of confusion is that I don't really see the need for tarballs
and what I am doing right now feels a bit clumsy and w
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xnoise".
* Package name: xnoise
Version : 0.1.25-1
Upstream Author : Jörn Magens
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/xnoise/
* License : GPLv2+
Section : x11
It builds these binary packages:
xnois
32 matches
Mail list logo
