Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Le Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:28:26PM +0200, Benoît Knecht a écrit : > Kilian Krause wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > > Nicolas wrote: > > > > > Same as LGPL, the copyright is not the same. > > > > > > Again, you must include the text of the license in a s

Re: RFS: tsung (2nd try)

Hello Benoît, 2011/6/30 Benoît Knecht : > Ignace Mouzannar wrote: >> * License         : GPL-2 >                      ^ > Parts of the code use the Erlang Public License v1.1 (based on the > Mozilla Public License v1.0); is this license compatible with the GPL-2 > (I know the MPL isn't)? My R

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi all, I splitted the package and created a phing-doc package that hold the documentation. Regards, Nicolas 2011/7/2 Arno Töll > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > On 02.07.2011 17:54, Nicolas wrote: > >> Another thing though; I just noticed that out of the 18MB of th

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 02.07.2011 17:54, Nicolas wrote: >> Another thing though; I just noticed that out of the 18MB of the >> unpacked .deb, 15MB are documentation. I would say it's definitely worth >> having a separate phing-doc package in this case. [..] >> > Good

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi, Le 2 juillet 2011 15:21, Benoît Knecht a écrit : > > It's in much better shape, yes. Thanks for taking our remarks in > consideration. > > I think, even if I made packages for more than one year, I a kind of newbie and any advices are helpful. I like improve my knowledge. > Another thing t

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi Nicolas, (BTW, please don't CC me, I'm subscribed to the list.) Nicolas wrote: > [...] > > I think it's ready for sponsor. I just have to find one. It's in much better shape, yes. Thanks for taking our remarks in consideration. Another thing though; I just noticed that out of the 18MB of th

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi, Le 2 juillet 2011 14:10, Benoît Knecht a écrit : > Nicolas wrote: > > I think and I hope that time it's ok : > > - I add description for expat and apache license > > That's much better. I don't think you should have "Copyright (c) 1998, > 1999, 2000 Thai Open Source Software Center Ltd" in

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Benoît, On 02.07.2011 14:10, Benoît Knecht wrote: >> - I remove email for bug. > > I'm happy with that change, but maybe Arno disagrees ;) I'm fine with that. I was just disagreeing with you, denoting upstream's preferred way to report bugs shoul

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Nicolas wrote: > I think and I hope that time it's ok : > - I add description for expat and apache license That's much better. I don't think you should have "Copyright (c) 1998, 1999, 2000 Thai Open Source Software Center Ltd" in the Expat license text though, that would belong to the 'Copyright:'

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi all, I think and I hope that time it's ok : - I add description for expat and apache license - I add a special stanza and only one for LGPL-3 license - I remove email for bug. All changes push to mentors and git repository. Regards, Nicolas Le 2 juillet 2011 12:28, Benoît Knecht a écrit :

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi Kilian, Kilian Krause wrote: > On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > Nicolas wrote: > > > > Same as LGPL, the copyright is not the same. > > > > Again, you must include the text of the license in a stand-alone License > > paragraph. > > actually you may be interes

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Arno Töll wrote: > On 02.07.2011 11:52, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > If it was upstream's man page, of course I wouldn't suggest modifying it > > in that way. But since it was written by the packager, and at least for > > now will mainly be installed on Debian, I think it makes sense not to > > advise

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Benoit, On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > Nicolas wrote: > > > Same as LGPL, the copyright is not the same. > > Again, you must include the text of the license in a stand-alone License > paragraph. actually you may be interested in the base-files package having /us

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Nicolas wrote: > > - debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned > >previously. > > > > I used Arno advice and add twice reporting system, debian on and upstream > one. > > > > - Your debian/copyright file is still not DEP-5 compliant. To repeat > >what I said before, it

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Benoît, On 02.07.2011 11:52, Benoît Knecht wrote: > If it was upstream's man page, of course I wouldn't suggest modifying it > in that way. But since it was written by the packager, and at least for > now will mainly be installed on Debian, I think

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi Arno, Arno Töll wrote: > On 02.07.2011 10:33, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > - debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned > > previously. > > that's not necessarily a problem. You, apparently a FSFE member could > just take a look into coreutils manpages. See, for instance, cp(

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi, > - debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned >previously. > > I used Arno advice and add twice reporting system, debian on and upstream one. > - Your debian/copyright file is still not DEP-5 compliant. To repeat >what I said before, it "doesn't use a versioned F

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Benoît, On 02.07.2011 10:33, Benoît Knecht wrote: > - debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned > previously. that's not necessarily a problem. You, apparently a FSFE member could just take a look into coreutils manpages. Se

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi Nicolas, Nicolas wrote: > Hi all, > > thanks Benoît. I updated the package following your advices. > > I uploaded it on mentors and push my changes on the git repository. There are still a few things that need to be fixed: - debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned p

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi all, thanks Benoît. I updated the package following your advices. I uploaded it on mentors and push my changes on the git repository. I allways search for a sponsor. Regards, Nicolas Le 2 juillet 2011 00:20, Benoît Knecht a écrit : > Hi Nicolas, > > Nicolas wrote: > > I am looking for a s

Re: RFS: creepy (updated package) (New Upstream release)

Daniel, On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 10:20:55PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.94-1 > of my package "creepy". > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/creepy/creepy_0.1.94-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Bui