Re: RFS: kst (updated package)

Ruben, On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 19:55 -0500, Ruben Molina wrote: > El mar, 28-06-2011 a las 16:12 +0200, David Kalnischkies escribió: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 15:54, Ruben Molina wrote: > > > Thanks for your help! Looks like it was wrong to assume a common set of > > > symbols for all the arches

Re: RFS: winefish

El vie, 22-04-2011 a las 14:42 +0530, pallavi matani escribió: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "winefish". > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/winefish/winefish_1.3.3-1.dsc Hi Pallavi, I'm not a DD, but I had done a short review of your package... You need to wo

Re: RFS: fribid

El dom, 24-04-2011 a las 15:41 +0200, Samuel Lidén Borell escribió: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fribid" (pronounced free-bid) > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fribid/fribid_0.3.0-1.dsc Hi Samuel, I'm not a DD, but here is a short review: Pl

Re: RFS: kst (updated package)

El mar, 28-06-2011 a las 16:12 +0200, David Kalnischkies escribió: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 15:54, Ruben Molina wrote: > > Thanks for your help! Looks like it was wrong to assume a common set of > > symbols for all the arches. May I ask you to remove debian/*.symbols, > > and try to build the p

Re: RFS: libpam-abl

On 06/28/2011 02:12 PM, Etienne Millon wrote: Hello, I had a look at your package. Please not that I am not a DD, and so I can't sponsor your contribution. Build - Your package builds in a clean sid chroot. Lintian --- Your package is _not_ lintian clean. Here are the warnings upto -

Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)

On 06/28/2011 02:38 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: > Nikolaus, > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:10:44PM -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> On 06/28/2011 01:47 AM, Kilian Krause wrote: >>> Nikolaus, >>> >>> On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 18:46 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote: On 06/27/2011 05:32 PM, Kilian Krause wrote

Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)

Nikolaus, On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:10:44PM -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > On 06/28/2011 01:47 AM, Kilian Krause wrote: > > Nikolaus, > > > > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 18:46 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > >> On 06/27/2011 05:32 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: > > 5. Your package doesn't build in pbuilder

Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)

On 06/28/2011 01:47 AM, Kilian Krause wrote: > Nikolaus, > > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 18:46 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> On 06/27/2011 05:32 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: > 5. Your package doesn't build in pbuilder: > > dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory doc > dpkg-sour

RFS: odvr

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odvr". * Package name: odvr Version : 0.1.5-1 Upstream Author : Tristan Willy * URL : http://code.google.com/p/odvr/ * License : GNU GPL v3 Section : sound It builds these binary packages: od

Re: RFS: cfortran (updated package)

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 21:08 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:20110621-1 >> of my package "cfortran". > > actually why would you want that? The latest version in unstable has

Re: RFS: kst (updated package)

On 2011-06-28, David Kalnischkies wrote: > btw: Without looking at the source: Architecture dependent symbols are e.g. > all methods with size_t (or its sibling ssize_t) or va_list as parameter. and qreal if kst is what I think it is. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@l

Re: RFS: kst (updated package)

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 15:54, Ruben Molina wrote: > Thanks for your help!  Looks like it was wrong to assume a common set of > symbols for all the arches.  May I ask you to remove debian/*.symbols, > and try to build the package again? Set in your debian/rules this instead of removal: export DP

Re: RFS: kst (updated package)

Hi Kilian, El mar, 28-06-2011 a las 08:02 +0200, Kilian Krause escribió: > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 18:45 -0500, Ruben Molina wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.3-1 > > of my package "kst". > > > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > >

Re: RFS: libpam-abl

Hello, I had a look at your package. Please not that I am not a DD, and so I can't sponsor your contribution. Build - Your package builds in a clean sid chroot. Lintian --- Your package is _not_ lintian clean. Here are the warnings upto -E: - I: libpam-abl source: binary-control-fie

pbuilder and not-unstable

Hi, I'm trying to convert my building procedure(s) to using pbuilder/cowbuilder to make eg. backporting and/or creating packages for a different release, or different build requirements, feasible (have tried VMs first, but that didn't work out, either). I also want to use git-buildpackage. Unfor

Seeking package reviewing help by non-DDs

Hi all, I suppose many of you might not (yet) be DDs and hence feel like all they can do is package software and wait for some DD to come and respond to this RFS (in fact there are many other options to contribute, but please read on for at least one of them). Given that I've BCC'ed all the people

sht

Hi, You are invited to visit my website http://sweethometips.com which has lots of useful information. My site has lots of topics discussing about the followings: * Health & Fitness * Beauty Tips * Make Up Tips * Bridal Makeup * Kitchen Tips * Womens Health & many