On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 20:59:33 +0200
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Good evening Mentors,
>
> if I have a mirror whichcontain oldstable, stable, testing and
> unstable, is there a maintainer script to create the
> Packages/Source files for each release correctly?
>
> Currently I have for each relea
The git-remote-hg project seems like a much more natural way to
interact with remote hg repositories. I saw some evidence on the git
list and wiki that git-remote-foo is the way forward for foreign VCS
support in git. There was even a GSoC project to get git-remote-svn
into git. No idea about when
Good evening Mentors,
if I have a mirror whichcontain oldstable, stable, testing and unstable,
is there a maintainer script to create the Packages/Source files for
each release correctly?
Currently I have for each release a seperated pool and symlink the files
into the "real" public mirror bu
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:03:09AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Well, there is https://github.com/offbytwo/git-hg , it is a 120-lines
> shell script which uses (bundled) hg-fast-export and seems to create a hg
> repo at .git/hgcheckout, but I didn't try it.
I've tried git-hg from https://gith
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.4~rc1-1
of my package "joystick", and the new version 1:1.27-1 of my package
"evtest" (which used to be part of the joystick source but is now maintained
separately upstream).
joystick builds these binary packages:
inputattach - uti
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> And I've push my changes to git.d.o, you can check it at:
>>
>> git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/herculesstudio.git
>>
>> Thanks and Regards,
>
> That's great if you use Git, I maintain all of my packages this was as
> well. But next
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 10:18:08PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 15:26:20 +0200, Alessandro Ghedini
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your review.
> >
>
> Uploaded. Feel free to contact me directly for future jansson uploads.
Great, thank you :)
> I took the liberty of pushing a
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Oops, don't know why I broke off mid-sentence like that. My point was that
> porting 0 A.D. to work with newer versions of Spidermonkey seems to be a lot
> of work for very little gain and lots of opportunities for potential
> breakage. Phil
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Vincent Cheng
> wrote:
>
> > Similar to why 0 A.D. needs libenet 1.2; Philip explained earlier that 0
> > A.D. needs a specific version of Spidermonkey (1.8.5) in order to
> maintain
> > compatibility, since it us
On 04/10/2011 04:40 AM, Liang Guo wrote:
> CC to debian-mentors and BUG:585510
>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> 1/ Can you use the new DEP5 format for your debian/copyright?
>>
> Done
>
>> 2/ The policy is now 3.9.1.
> Done, actually current policy is 3.9.2 now, but l
10 matches
Mail list logo
