Re: RFS: blockade upgrade

2011-04-02 Thread Paul Wise
I would suggest joining the Debian games team, committing the package to our SVN repository and maintaining it there. If you are willing to join the team, please check out our wiki pages, jump on our IRC channel, introduce yourself and we will give you a run-down of how the team works: http://wiki

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-02 Thread Karl Goetz
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 21:59:59 -0700 Vincent Cheng wrote: > Dear mentors, Not sure if all the CCs are required, so preserving them. > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "0ad". > > * Package name: 0ad > Version : 0~r09049~alpha4-1 > Upstream Author : Wildfire Games > * URL

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-02 Thread Paul Wise
Hi Vincent, (CCing you since I'm not sure which lists you are on if any, sorry for any duplicate mail) Looks like you are taking over the ITPs owned by Bertrand Marc, with his permission. Bertrand was maintaining the packaging in the games team's SVN repository, but you don't seem to have update

RFS: 0ad

2011-04-02 Thread Vincent Cheng
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "0ad". * Package name: 0ad Version : 0~r09049~alpha4-1 Upstream Author : Wildfire Games * URL : http://wildfiregames.com/0ad/ * License : GPL, LGPL, MIT Programming Lang: C++ Description : 3D real-

Re: RFS: the mingw-w64 toolchain

2011-04-02 Thread Ove Kaaven
Den 02. april 2011 23:16, skrev Stephen Kitt: > The first strategy would allow the packages to make their way into the > archive sooner, but I'm not sure what the FTP Masters' reaction would be to a > NEW package relying on an "Arch: all" package to avoid bootstrapping itself. They might be unders

RFS: plowshare

2011-04-02 Thread Fernando C. Estrada
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "plowshare". * Package name: plowshare Version : 0.9.5~r1411-1 Upstream Author : Arnau Sanchez Matthieu Crapet * URL : http://code.google.com/p/plowshare/ * License : GPL-3+ Section

Re: Guide on using debhelper / dh_dkms to build DKMS packages?

2011-04-02 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Bill Johnstone wrote: > Hello all. > > I'm a novice at building Debian packages, but following the New > Maintainers' Guide, I've been able to successfully use dh_make, quilt, and > dpkg-buildpackage to make proper packages. > > I now need to build some out-of-tree

Re: RFS: the mingw-w64 toolchain

2011-04-02 Thread Stephen Kitt
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 19:18:26 +0200, Ove Kåven wrote: > Den 29. mars 2011 01:08, skrev Stephen Kitt: > > In order to upload to Debian, it would theoretically be > > possible to upload mingw-w64 since it's "Arch: all", then upload the full > > gcc-mingw-w64 without bootstrapping. Alternatively, boot

Re: Help with lintian

2011-04-02 Thread Chris Carr
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 10:43 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Generally the diff ought not to include ".gitmodules" in the first place > if you did not intend for it (and the 7 other files) to be there. > Most likely dpkg-source/dpkg-buildpackage with -i is not enough in > this case. I believe [1] w

Re: RFS: the mingw-w64 toolchain

2011-04-02 Thread Ove Kåven
Den 29. mars 2011 01:08, skrev Stephen Kitt: > In order to upload to Debian, it would theoretically be > possible to upload mingw-w64 since it's "Arch: all", then upload the full > gcc-mingw-w64 without bootstrapping. Alternatively, bootstrapping the > toolchain would only require two steps (but wi

Re: docs are generated on all build machines

2011-04-02 Thread The Fungi
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:02:19AM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: > I think his package is already Arch:all. [...] Ahh, yes, I had missed the package name/source. I agree your analysis sounds a far more likely scenario given the problem description. -- { IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); WWW(http://fungi.yuggoth.

Re: docs are generated on all build machines

2011-04-02 Thread Scott Howard
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 9:44 AM, The Fungi wrote: > On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:21:57AM +0200, Michael Wild wrote: > [...] >> I'd like the docs only to be built *once* on the build server, not for >> every architecture, since they are architecture independent and building >> them for every architect

Re: docs are generated on all build machines

2011-04-02 Thread The Fungi
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:21:57AM +0200, Michael Wild wrote: [...] > I'd like the docs only to be built *once* on the build server, not for > every architecture, since they are architecture independent and building > them for every architecture would waste hours of time. [...] For the moment at l

Re: Help with lintian

2011-04-02 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-04-02 10:11, Chris Carr wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm puzzled by this warning from lintian: > > chrisc@xaphod:/var/cache/pbuilder/result$ lintian -Ivi --pedantic > angband_3.2.0-1_i386.changes > N: Setting up lab in /tmp/esv0j1oUBP ... > N: Pro

Re: docs are generated on all build machines

2011-04-02 Thread Michael Wild
On 04/01/2011 01:50 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > Michael Wild writes: > >> In my case, I would need to set different configure flags depending on >> whether the documentation should be built or not since the default >> target also builds the docs if enabled. > > Under what conditions should the docum

Help with lintian

2011-04-02 Thread Chris Carr
Hi all, I'm puzzled by this warning from lintian: chrisc@xaphod:/var/cache/pbuilder/result$ lintian -Ivi --pedantic angband_3.2.0-1_i386.changes N: Setting up lab in /tmp/esv0j1oUBP ... N: Processing 3 packages... N: N: Processing changes file angband_3.2.0-1_i386 (version 1:3.2.0-1) ... N:

Re: RFS: adms

2011-04-02 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, Bastien, I am not a DD, but I can try to give you some tips: 1) lintian -IE --pedantic over .dsc gives you 2 warnings: P: adms source: debian-control-has-unusual-field-spacing line 18 E: adms source: unknown-file-in-debian-source git-patches 2) patch should correspond to dep-3[1], and it s