Re: RFS: snake4 (updated package)

Am Samstag, den 05.02.2011, 14:18 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2011-02-05 13:39, Michael wrote: > >> On 2011-01-23 16:05, michael wrote: > >>> > > [...] > >> > > >> > > >> > Hey, > >> > > >> > Sorry for the late reply. I am taking the l

Re: RFS: snake4 (updated package)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-02-05 14:28, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:37:18AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > [snip] >> Finally there is this part, which I asked you to look at: >> >> ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) >> CFLAGS +

Re: RFS: snake4 (updated package)

On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 03:28:16PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:37:18AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > [snip] > > Finally there is this part, which I asked you to look at: > > > > ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) > > CFLAGS += -O0 > > else > > C

Re: RFS: snake4 (updated package)

On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:37:18AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: [snip] > Finally there is this part, which I asked you to look at: > > ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) > CFLAGS += -O0 > else > CFLAGS += -O2 > endif > > I do not see any changes to it, nor to the upstrea

Re: RFS: snake4 (updated package)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-02-05 13:39, Michael wrote: >> On 2011-01-23 16:05, michael wrote: >>> > > [...] >> > >> > >> > Hey, >> > >> > Sorry for the late reply. I am taking the liberty of answering this one >> > first. > That's o.k. although I feared I had picked

Re: RFS: snake4 (updated package)

Am Donnerstag, den 03.02.2011, 00:37 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2011-01-23 16:05, michael wrote: > > [...] > > > Hey, > > Sorry for the late reply. I am taking the liberty of answering this one > first. That's o.k. although I feared