RFS: pyragua (updated package, 2nd try)

2010-11-01 Thread Julián Moreno Patiño
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.5-2 of my package "pyragua". It builds these binary packages: pyragua- Very lightweight Python editor The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/de

Re: Open RFS lacking (further) response

2010-11-01 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2010-10-30 08:59, Michael Tautschnig wrote: [...] One technical question, however, remains: Could we have some list of packages that remain to be reviewed? Just telling people "please review some package" is pretty awkward... Best regards, Michael

Re: Open RFS lacking (further) response

2010-11-01 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:59:45PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit : I think this is a superb step in the right direction; while clearly the list on mentors.debian.net, as suggested in another email in this thread, is the more comprehensive list of

RFS: hotot

2010-11-01 Thread Julián Moreno Patiño
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hotot". * Package name: hotot Version : 0.9.5~hg521-1 Upstream Author : Shellex Wai <5h3l...@gmail.com> * URL : http://code.google.com/p/hotot/ * License : LGPL-3 Section : net It builds these

Re: RFS: fritzing

2010-11-01 Thread chrysn
hello enrique, i've just built fritzing from your package (fritzing_0.4.3b-4), but ran into problems as described in [#571640] ("qmake build system can't be set to use qmake-qt3 or qmake-qt4"). this typically happens on systems that have qt3-dev-tools installed; in that case, debhelper uses /usr/

Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-01 Thread Iker Salmón San Millán
Hello again, i've uploaded the package again and i hope that there will be less errors this time I've added manpage, i've corrected copyrigth, changelog and build dependecies. I think that the best option is to add conflicts with knm-runtime because there are so many troubles running network-man

Re: RFS: mediadownloader

2010-11-01 Thread Fernando Lemos
Hey, On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Marco Bavagnoli wrote: > One question: when and if the package will be clear, will I need to delete > the old package ? Or just make version 1.4.2-2 ? Keep the version intact (1.4.2-1) and just dput it again. It'll overwrite the old package. Regards, -- T

Re: RFS: mediadownloader

2010-11-01 Thread Marco Bavagnoli
On 11/01/2010 05:19 PM, Williams Orellana wrote: 2010/10/27 Marco Bavagnoli: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mediadownloader". * Package name: mediadownloader Version : 1.4.2-1 Upstream Author : Marco Bavagnoli * URL : http://mediadownloader

Re: Bug merge fail owner mismatch

2010-11-01 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-11-01 14:29, Daniel Stender wrote: > Hi people, > > it would be good idea to merge my ITP with the "original" RFP, but my attempt > to merge two bugs failed: > > > Bug#568920: RFP: didjvu -- encoding into DjVu with layers separation > Bug

Re: RFS: mediadownloader

2010-11-01 Thread Williams Orellana
2010/10/27 Marco Bavagnoli : > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mediadownloader". > > * Package name    : mediadownloader >  Version         : 1.4.2-1 >  Upstream Author : Marco Bavagnoli > * URL             : http://mediadownloader.cz.cc > * License         : GPL3 >  S

Bug merge fail owner mismatch

2010-11-01 Thread Daniel Stender
Hi people, it would be good idea to merge my ITP with the "original" RFP, but my attempt to merge two bugs failed: Bug#568920: RFP: didjvu -- encoding into DjVu with layers separation Bug#601781: ITP: didjvu - DjVu encoder with foreground/background layer separation using Gamera Mismatch - onl

Fwd: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-01 Thread Iker Salmón San Millán
-- Mensaje reenviado -- De: Iker Salmón San Millán Fecha: 1 de noviembre de 2010 13:35 Asunto: Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde Para: Didier 'OdyX' Raboud 2010/11/1 Andreas Ronnquist > On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:30:07 +0100 > Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: > > > Hi! > > I am not a DD, so

Re: Fwd: Build-Depends-Indep dependencies

2010-11-01 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
anatoly techtonik writes: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Goswin von Brederlow > wrote: >> Ansgar Burchardt writes: >> >>> anatoly techtonik writes: >>> Can anybody point me to the part of the policy where Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep differences are explained? >>> >>> T

Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-01 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: > Dear Mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wicd-client-kde". > > * Package name: wicd-client-kde > Version : 0.2.1-1 > Upstream Author : Anthony Vital > * URL : http://gitorious.org/wicd-client-kde > * License

Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-01 Thread Andreas Ronnquist
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:30:07 +0100 Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: > Dear Mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wicd-client-kde". > > * Package name: wicd-client-kde > Version : 0.2.1-1 > Upstream Author : Anthony Vital > * URL : http://gitorious.org/

RFS: wicd-client-kde

2010-11-01 Thread Iker Salmón San Millán
Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wicd-client-kde". * Package name: wicd-client-kde Version : 0.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Anthony Vital * URL : http://gitorious.org/wicd-client-kde * License : GPL v3 Section : kde It builds thes

Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package)

2010-11-01 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Daniel Echeverry writes: >> I did take a look at your package. Some comments: >> >> · debian/changelog: There is a space missing in the last line. > I am a bit confused, I don't understand this You wrote +Change all patches from quilt instead of + Change all patches from quilt in

Re: RFS: ovito

2010-11-01 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Pekko, [...] > > > I'd like to point you to [1] - if you'd have some time, it would be > > great if you could also help others to get their packages reviewed > > and sponsored. Meanwhile there have been new RFS sent to the list > > [2][3] which might be worth taking. > > Surely you're joking

Re: Fwd: Build-Depends-Indep dependencies

2010-11-01 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Ansgar Burchardt writes: > >> anatoly techtonik writes: >> >>> Can anybody point me to the part of the policy where Build-Depends and >>> Build-Depends-Indep differences are explained? >> >> They differ in when they must be satisfie