On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:18, Paul Wise wrote:
(sorry about the CC, my mail client was a little too smart) :)
>> The package is pyfa [1], a fitting assistant for EVE Online. Their
>> latest download URL that I managed to find that actually contains some
>> sort of license information [2] is rat
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 14:33 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ceph".
> I was going to make a package of ceph, so I would be happy to be your
> sponsor.
Wonderful! Thank you :)
> > The package appears to be lin
> > d) Create an user "udisks", add a PolicyKit rule to allow it to mount
> > device files, use that for the init script (not even sure it's
> > possible)
> how would it leave the file permissions on the mounted filesystems?
> Would them be readable/writable by local users?
i was referring to optio
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Stefan Ott wrote:
> The package is pyfa [1], a fitting assistant for EVE Online. Their
> latest download URL that I managed to find that actually contains some
> sort of license information [2] is rather old, from 2006. I guess I'll
> contact them to ask whether
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 06:14, Paul Wise wrote:
> Sounds like it belongs in contrib and the non-free data should be
> packaged separately.
>
> Have you asked upstream to put the data under a DFSG-free license?
No, not yet, but I'm pretty sure they won't do that.
> If you can give some details ab
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
Hi Sage,
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 14:33 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ceph".
I was going to make a package of ceph, so I would be happy to be your
sponsor.
Yay! I hope this works out.
The package appears to b
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 07:13:52PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> Hello, mentors
disclaimer: i'm not a DD/DM
> I could make udisks-glue run as another user (say, nobody), but that
> would mean that the default config would not be able to mount devices.
> That's because PolicyKit will only allow ud
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sciteproj".
* Package name: sciteproj
Version : 0.3.14-1
Upstream Author : Andreas Rönnquist
* URL : http://www.gusnan.se/sciteproj
* License : GPLv3
Section : editors
It builds these binary
Sounds like it belongs in contrib and the non-free data should be
packaged separately.
Have you asked upstream to put the data under a DFSG-free license?
If you can give some details about which package and what the data is,
maybe we can give you a better answer.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debia
Hi list
I have a small question: I would like to package a piece of software
that, when first launched, downloads additional non-free data files
which are needed to run. I am now wondering whether a) I should just
leave it at that, possibly adding a note to the package, or b) ask the
upstream auth
Hi Sage,
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 14:33 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ceph".
I was going to make a package of ceph, so I would be happy to be your
sponsor.
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
Actually it has some lintian warnings. The current Standards
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ceph". Ceph is a distributed
file system designed for scalability, reliability, and performance. I am
the upstream maintainer and primary developer for Ceph.
The current package has been reviewed by Asheesh Laroia and Clint Byrum
(at
>
> [...] (lots of further info on packagekit)
>
> Well, I am a DD and in principle could sponsor such a package, but I
just
> lack
> all the know how needed to properly evaluate gnome-related packages.
And,
> as I
> already wrote in another reponse to an RFS some minutes ago, it seems
that
> nob
13 matches
Mail list logo
