On Oct 5, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
We probably should do a better job of identifying these packages and
responding to the RFS to tell people that it's of questionable
importance (or clearly no importance) and then channeling them into
assistance to Debian that is of greater importa
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 19:45:56 +0900
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> following our discussion in the ‘Four days’ thread, here is a simple
> proposal for organising package peer reviews using the BTS.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/PackageReview
Hi Charles,
I had a pair of questions, perhaps you
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtk2-engines-equinox".
* Package name: gtk2-engines-equinox
Version : 1.30.2-2
Upstream Author : Matthieu James
* URL : http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php?content=121881
* License : GPL-2+
Section
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 05:00:42AM -0700, D Haley wrote:
> * Although marked as GPL2 or any later, the actual python programs do not
> * have the pre-amble in the source files, as required by the licence.
Uhm, no. The GPL merely lists that as one of possible ways to do so, and,
even though it is
Good evening,
> Hi -- just a random thought, but the "can have but not need KDE stuff"
> makes me think of the Quassel package. You might want to take a look
> at it and see how it handles that.
Thanks for that hint, it is working as they do it. It can be used everytime,
one want to create packa
[I wasn't Cc:ed, hence I see your message only now, and I am replying
after manually quoting the text from the web archive and manually
setting the In-Reply-To field: I hope this won't break the thread;
apologies if it does!]
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:02:15 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 9, 20
Le Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 05:13:22PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia a écrit :
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
>>
>> perhaps the list's description, that still points at
>> http://people.d.o/~mpalmer,
>> could be updated as well? I have not figured out if this is done through
>> a bug on lists.d.o
Hello,
I came across your g/mapcatcher package today, I had not heard of the project
before. This looks like an excellent lightweight alternative to marble - I have
already installed it on my machine (marble wont fit, it has way too many deps).
I can't sponsor you, however here are some comment
Dear all,
following our discussion in the ‘Four days’ thread, here is a simple proposal
for organising package peer reviews using the BTS.
http://wiki.debian.org/PackageReview
In this proposal, ‘debian-ment...@lists.debian.org’ is the BTS user. This will
not increase the traffic on this list. Bu
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 22:38:59 +0200, Julien Viard de Galbert
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:09:23PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "packagekit".
>> This package has been reviewed by Paul Wise and Asheesh Laroia already
>> and
>> s
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
>> For example here are a couple of my last questions there:
>>
>> http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=55938
>> http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=55976
>
> Both look on-t
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> For example here are a couple of my last questions there:
>
> http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=55938
> http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=55976
Both look on-topic for user support fora such as forums.d.n, the
debian-use
12 matches
Mail list logo
