On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, David D Lowe wrote:
Hello Asheesh.
As a mentee, this sounds like a great idea. It can get quite
discouraging when you don't get any replies to your RFS. I like the
implicit permission to remind people of your RFS after four days. So
far, I haven't dared to do that: I've j
On 2010-10-02 22:28, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2010-10-02 22:25, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
>> Hi, Michael:
>
>> On Saturday 02 October 2010 21:24:22 Michael Diers wrote:
>>> Dear mentors and backporters,
>>>
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.12dfsg-2~bpo50+1
>>> of my existing b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-10-02 22:25, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> Hi, Michael:
>
> On Saturday 02 October 2010 21:24:22 Michael Diers wrote:
>> Dear mentors and backporters,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.12dfsg-2~bpo50+1
>> of my existing ba
Hi, Michael:
On Saturday 02 October 2010 21:24:22 Michael Diers wrote:
> Dear mentors and backporters,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.12dfsg-2~bpo50+1
> of my existing backport of package "subversion".
>
> Please note that 1.6.12dfsg-2 is currently in "unstable" and will ta
Dear mentors and backporters,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.12dfsg-2~bpo50+1
of my existing backport of package "subversion".
Please note that 1.6.12dfsg-2 is currently in "unstable" and will take a
few days to migrate to "testing"; however, this update addresses
CVE-2010-331
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 13:46:40 +0530, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> http://build-common.alioth.debian.org/cdbs-doc.html#id2561450
>
> So you think it maybe better to go the cdbs->qmake-class way?
>
Without wishing to speak ill of CDBS, you will find that more people can
help you with debhelper questions
2010/10/2 Rustom Mody :
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:16 PM, David Kalnischkies
> wrote:
>> 2010/10/2 Rustom Mody :
>>> Are there any pointers/policy/howtos for using qmake (rather than
>>> configure) for deb-packaging?
>>
>> Do you know debhelper? debhelper (>= 7.4.12) should have support
>> for th
Hello Asheesh.
As a mentee, this sounds like a great idea. It can get quite
discouraging when you don't get any replies to your RFS. I like the
implicit permission to remind people of your RFS after four days. So
far, I haven't dared to do that: I've just waited for the next upstream
release
Hello. I use git-buildpackage and want to use ccache. I tried exporting
overriden CC and PATH, but that had no effect and `echo' in debian/rules
shows that both variables are reverted to the defaults. Does
git-buildpackage clear the environment? How can I use ccache in this
configuration?
--
WBR,
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:16 PM, David Kalnischkies
wrote:
> Hi Rustom,
>
> 2010/10/2 Rustom Mody :
>> Are there any pointers/policy/howtos for using qmake (rather than
>> configure) for deb-packaging?
>
> Do you know debhelper? debhelper (>= 7.4.12) should have support
> for the qmake buildsystem
Hi Rustom,
2010/10/2 Rustom Mody :
> Are there any pointers/policy/howtos for using qmake (rather than
> configure) for deb-packaging?
Do you know debhelper? debhelper (>= 7.4.12) should have support
for the qmake buildsystem built-in, so you should be able to use its
tiny example rules file (i a
11 matches
Mail list logo
