Re: RFS: subversion (updated package) [lenny-backports, 1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2]

2010-07-14 Thread Simon Horman
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:24:01PM +0200, Michael Diers wrote: > Dear mentors and backporters, > > here's another attempt at soliciting sponsorship for my update to the > Subversion package in lenny-backports. > > As it stands, the package is a straightforward update to my previous > backport 1.6

My pending RFSs (xpdf, ushare, protoaculous, gordon, checksec)

2010-07-14 Thread Michael Gilbert
Hi, I have the following packages currently prepared and am waiting for review by interested sponsors. Some of these have been pending since December 2009). xpdf (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xpdf): - I adopted this package a few months ago since it needed a security-minded mai

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On 07/15/2010 02:23 AM, Rogério Brito wrote: > > Did I do something wrong here? I got this: > > > > , > > | tmp$ dget -xu http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zathura/zathura_0.0.7-2.dsc > > | (...) > > | dget: removing zathura_0.0.7

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi there. On Jul 15 2010, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > I've updated the package. Did I do something wrong here? I got this: , | tmp$ dget -xu http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zathura/zathura_0.0.7-2.dsc | (...) | dget: removing zathura_0.0.7.orig.tar.gz (md5sum does not match) |

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/15/2010 01:08 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 07/15/2010 12:42 AM, Rogério Brito wrote: >> I would just suggest that you add a line to the control file >> putting a "Provides: pdf-reader" and adding something like the >> update-mime stuff

RFS: mediadownloader

2010-07-14 Thread deimos
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mediadownloader". * Package name: mediadownloader Version : 1.3.1-1 Upstream Author : Marco Bavagnoli lil.dei...@gmail.com * URL : http://googleimagedown.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPLv3 Section

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On 07/15/2010 12:42 AM, Rogério Brito wrote: > I would just suggest that you add a line to the control file putting a > "Provides: pdf-reader" and adding something like the update-mime stuff > to register it with the system, so that it is picked

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/15/2010 12:32 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Sebastian Ramacher , 2010-07-15, 00:19: >> I am still looking for a sponsor for "zathura". >> >> I'd really like to see zathura in Debian, since it offers a nice and >> minimalistic interface. zathura's m

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi there, Sebastian. On Jul 15 2010, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > I am still looking for a sponsor for "zathura". Unfortunately, I can't sponsor your upload, but the packaging looks fine at a first brief look (I have not yet tried to compile it---I am reading the packaging side of things for the m

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Sebastian Ramacher , 2010-07-15, 00:19: I am still looking for a sponsor for "zathura". I'd really like to see zathura in Debian, since it offers a nice and minimalistic interface. zathura's main focus is a vim-like interaction and experience. How does zathura compare to apvlv? -- Jakub Wil

Re: RFS: zathura

2010-07-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, On 06/26/2010 05:10 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zathura". > > * Package name: zathura > Version : 0.6.3-1 > Upstream Author : ML > * URL : http://zathura.pwmt

Re: RFS: acetoneiso (updated package)

2010-07-14 Thread Nick Andrik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Hi, > > looks good, uploaded! Thanks again! > But you should fix in your next release this one: > I: myspell-el-gr: conflicts-with-version openoffice.org (<= 1.0.3-2) > > Just move this from conflicts to breaks. OK, I changed it, it will be read

Re: How to test a manpage? ‘nroff -man | less’ does not display like ‘man’.

2010-07-14 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Mittwoch, den 14.07.2010, 15:48 +0200 schrieb Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo: > On Wednesday 14 July 2010 06:50:57 Charles Plessy wrote: [..] > > The workaround I found was to copy the new manpage in /tmp/man/man1, and > > call ‘man -M /tmp/man samtools’. Does anybody know how a more convenient >

RFS: sisc

2010-07-14 Thread David Banks
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sisc". Package name: sisc Version : 1.16.6-1 Upstream Author : Scott G. Miller URL : http://sisc-scheme.org/ License : MPL or GPL-2 Section : interpreters It builds these binary packages: sisc -

Re: RFS: acetoneiso (updated package)

2010-07-14 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 13.07.2010 19:29, schrieb Nick Andrik: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Many thanks! If you have time, could you please take a look also at this package: myspell-el-gr (I adopted it and updated it after years that had been left)? Package page: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/

Re: How to test a manpage? ‘nroff -man | less’ does not display like ‘man’.

2010-07-14 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hi Charles, On Wednesday 14 July 2010 06:50:57 Charles Plessy wrote: > Dear all, > > before updating a package, I wanted to look at the new upstream manpage, > but realised that ‘nroff -man’ does not produce the same output as ‘man’ > itself. Let's take the example of samtools(1) from the samtool

Re: How to test a manpage? ‘nroff -man | less’ does not display like ‘man’.

2010-07-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
14.07.2010 13:14, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:57:12AM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: >> Il 14/07/2010 6.50, Charles Plessy ha scritto: >>> Does anybody know how a more convenient to display a >>> manpage the same way as users will get it by using ‘man’ ? >> >> groff -T ascii -man

RFS: rsplib-2.7.4 (implementation of the IETF RSerPool framework and example applications)

2010-07-14 Thread Thomas Dreibholz
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rsplib". RSPLIB is the Open Source implementation (GPLv3) of the IETF's new framework for Reliable Server Pooling (RSerPool), which is described in RFC 5351 to RFC 5356. If you a looking for a Grid compution solution which is simple, easy

Re: RFS: subversion (updated package) [lenny-backports, 1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2]

2010-07-14 Thread Michael Diers
On 2010-07-06 02:58, Michael Diers wrote: > On 2010-07-03 05:54, Matt Taggart wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> Just a couple comments based on the changelog, I haven't looked at the >> packages. > > Matt, > > thanks a bundle for having a look. > subversion (1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2) lenny-backports

Re: How to test a manpage? ‘ nroff -man | less’ does not display like ‘man ’.

2010-07-14 Thread Roger Leigh
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:57:12AM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Il 14/07/2010 6.50, Charles Plessy ha scritto: > > Does anybody know how a more convenient to display a > > manpage the same way as users will get it by using ‘man’ ? > > groff -T ascii -man > zcat /usr/share/man/manX/XXX | groff -

Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread David Paleino
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:43:36 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:31:26AM +0200, David Paleino wrote: > > If Google changes again, I find it better to change code in one place than > > in tons of debian/watch files. > > Well, 16 (+1 in NEW queue now ;-)) are not really tons.

Re: How to test a manpage? ‘nroff -man | less’ does not display like ‘man’.

2010-07-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
14.07.2010 09:01, Russ Allbery wrote: [] > You can just run man directly on the *roff file, but if you want to stick > with the zcat pipeline, just add the -t flag to nroff to say to run the > output through the tbl preprocessor first. This is the most close of all suggestions. But even closer is

Re: Unknown architecture linux-any

2010-07-14 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 14.07.2010 04:09, schrieb Paul Wise: >> Yes, it seems that it is bug: #582804, but the mentors site does not >> have an updated lintian version. > Always run lintian from sid over your .changes file before uploading to > mentors. BTW: As ftp-master uses lintian, too, there's (nearly) al

Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:31:26AM +0200, David Paleino wrote: > If Google changes again, I find it better to change code in one place than in > tons of debian/watch files. Well, 16 (+1 in NEW queue now ;-)) are not really tons. IMHO the main advantage of redirectors in general (or equivalently a

Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread David Paleino
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:53:20 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Romain Beauxis wrote: > > Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 15:48:52, Raphael Geissert a écrit : > >> >> http://googlecode.debian.net/p/freemedform/ > >> > >> Please do not continue spreading the use of that redirector

Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread David Paleino
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:48:52 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > David Paleino wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:02:13 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> > >> > I wonder how I might get a watch file for code.google.com working. > >> > >> S

Re: Help for watch file

2010-07-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > But more work for package maintainers because these redirectors are > quite useful to keep your watch file simple (and thus less error prone). > For me the reasoning to not have a googlecode redirector while having sf > and githup redirector