On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Robrecht Noens wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.svn2431-3.1
> of my package "flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound".
>
> The package maintainer, petter.reinholdt...@usit.uio.no, told me I could
> take over the package.
That looks like an NMU
Please contact the maintainers of the site, I don't think they are
subscribed to this list:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/contact
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Harald Jenny schrieb am Monday, den 21. June 2010:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:24:18PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> > Harald Jenny schrieb:
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> >
> > I would be willing to sponsor this package if you don't find any other
> > sponsor.
>
> Thanks, would be very kind from you :-).
>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:27, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:21, Jason Holt wrote:
> >> Thank you! Obey Arthur Liu graciously offered to sponsor the package. But
> >> I'm always happy to have more feedback :)
> >
> > O
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:24:18PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> Harald Jenny schrieb:
Hi Sven,
>
> I would be willing to sponsor this package if you don't find any other
> sponsor.
Thanks, would be very kind from you :-).
> In particular, I would like you to contact the current
> amavisd-new m
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.20.1-1
of my package "gnustep-base".
It builds these binary packages:
gnustep-base-common - GNUstep Base library - common files
gnustep-base-doc - Documentation for the GNUstep Base Library
gnustep-base-examples - Examples using the G
Hi
Dne Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:57:05 +0200
Lars Volker napsal(a):
> thank you for your replies. I'd like to comment on some of the questions
> raised. First let me note, that I see two basic kinds of objections:
>
> - Objections related to the packages themselves:
> Those mainly arise from the fact
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.svn2431-3.1
of my package "flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound".
The package maintainer, petter.reinholdt...@usit.uio.no, told me I could
take over the package.
It builds these binary packages:
flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound - Adobe
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.svn2431-3.1
of my package "flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound".
It builds these binary packages:
flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound - Adobe Flash Player platform support library
for Esound, Jack and
The package appears to be lintian clea
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.svn2431-3.1
of my package "flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound".
The package maintainer, petter.reinholdt...@usit.uio.no, told me I could take
over the package.
It builds these binary packages:
flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound - Adobe F
Hi Lars,
take for example phpgwapi/inc/class.phpmailer.inc.php
It's license is LGPL and the authors are not listed in debian/copyright.
I know, that eGW has accumulated in it's history a shitload of code from all
sorts of other PHP projects. There are many classes from PEAR and Horde.
You'll ha
Harald Jenny schrieb:
I would be willing to sponsor this package if you don't find any other
sponsor. In particular, I would like you to contact the current
amavisd-new maintainer wether he would like to collaborate on this.
Seeing the number of open bugs on his package, I'm not 100% sure wether
h
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8.0-0.1
> of package "dnspython".
Robert Edmonds already uploaded a new version for this package yesterday,
so please ignore this RFS.
Thanks.
--
Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc
secu
On Mo, 21 Jun 2010, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > > It seems to depend on wxlua, right? Is this packaged in our
> > > archives? I didn't find the necessary headers, but I am interested
> > > in trying it out, sure.
> >
> > No, not packaged. That is the reason I started on it for packaing.
>
> Thank y
I uploaded a new version of roxterm, 1.18.4-1, to mentors.debian.net but
it isn't showing up. The old version, 1.18.3-1, which didn't get
uploaded by a sponsor, is still there. Should I have removed it first,
or is there a problem with the server? ISTR people having similar
problems with it in the
Hi Thomas, George, Laurent,
thank you for your replies. I'd like to comment on some of the questions
raised. First let me note, that I see two basic kinds of objections:
- Objections related to the packages themselves:
Those mainly arise from the fact, that Peter had invested *a lot* of
work into
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:27, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:21, Jason Holt wrote:
>> Thank you! Obey Arthur Liu graciously offered to sponsor the package. But
>> I'm always happy to have more feedback :)
>
> Obey,
> next time please alert the mailing list you're already worki
17 matches
Mail list logo