Re: Specifying %{variable} in control file for use in post inst?

2010-04-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Ignacio Valdes writes: > So there is no cross-compatibility between debian control file and rpm > spec file for introspecting their respective package variables? There is no cross-compatibility between Debian package building and RPMs at all. They are not even remotely similar systems. But yes

Re: Specifying %{variable} in control file for use in post inst?

2010-04-29 Thread Ignacio Valdes
So there is no cross-compatibility between debian control file and rpm spec file for introspecting their respective package variables? -- IV -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: Specifying %{variable} in control file for use in post inst?

2010-04-29 Thread Ignacio Valdes
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Ignacio Valdes wrote: >> It is a very complex, large package. >> Does anyone know the mechanics of doing introspection in postinst for >> the control file defined variables? >> > Exactly why the postinst generation method that has been given

Re: Specifying %{variable} in control file for use in post inst?

2010-04-29 Thread Thomas Goirand
Ignacio Valdes wrote: > It is a very complex, large package. > Does anyone know the mechanics of doing introspection in postinst for > the control file defined variables? > Exactly why the postinst generation method that has been given as a (pretty good) solution would not work? Thomas -- To

Re: Specifying %{variable} in control file for use in post inst?

2010-04-29 Thread Ignacio Valdes
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ignacio Valdes writes: >> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: >>> Ignacio Valdes writes: > So what is the usual method of accessing control file values such as Package: in postinst? > >>> Generally, you don't, sin

Re: Specifying %{variable} in control file for use in post inst?

2010-04-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Ignacio Valdes writes: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Ignacio Valdes writes: >>> So what is the usual method of accessing control file values such as >>> Package: in postinst? >> Generally, you don't, since generally there's no reason to do so.  I >> can't say I've e

Re: Specifying %{variable} in control file for use in post inst?

2010-04-29 Thread Ignacio Valdes
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ignacio Valdes writes: > >> So what is the usual method of accessing control file values such as >> Package: in postinst? > > Generally, you don't, since generally there's no reason to do so.  I can't > say I've ever had any reason to want to

Re: Specifying %{variable} in control file for use in post inst?

2010-04-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Ignacio Valdes writes: > So what is the usual method of accessing control file values such as > Package: in postinst? Generally, you don't, since generally there's no reason to do so. I can't say I've ever had any reason to want to do that in any of the Debian packages I maintain. If you do ne

Re: Specifying %{variable} in control file for use in post inst?

2010-04-29 Thread Ignacio Valdes
So what is the usual method of accessing control file values such as Package: in postinst? What is the usual method of accessing user-defined control file values such as XC-branding in postinst? I would have presume that using variables such as %{Package} or %{branding} in postinst would have don

Re: RFS: acgvision-agent [2nd try]

2010-04-29 Thread Torsten Werner
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Rémi Debay wrote: > Do you mean that the file is still in the .orig.tar ? yes > I thought I am not allowed to modify this file except if it's the first > version (and it's the fifth). That is maybe a limitation of the mentors server? I don't know. You could hav

Re: RFS: acgvision-agent [2nd try]

2010-04-29 Thread Rémi Debay
Hi Torsten, Do you mean that the file is still in the .orig.tar ? I thought I am not allowed to modify this file except if it's the first version (and it's the fifth). If it is allowed, I d be glad if you delete it but could you explain me how to proceed (Except if it is a easy untar rm tar stuf

Re: RFS: acgvision-agent [2nd try]

2010-04-29 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Rémi, On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Rémi Debay wrote: > I deleted the file  etc/InstallCert.java. I don't use it. this file is still in the tarball. Do you want me to remove it before uploading the package? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.

RFS: gnustep-dl2 (updated package, fixes RC bug)

2010-04-29 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12.0-2 of my package "gnustep-dl2". It builds these binary packages: gnustep-dl2 - Objective-C Classes needed for Database Access gnustep-dl2-postgresql-adaptor - gnustep-dl2 adaptor to connect to PostgreSQL gnustep-dl2-sqlite-adapto

Tuklu: die neue Website für Internet-Auktionen und Online-Verkauf - jetzt 6 Monate kostenlos inserie ren und verkaufen

2010-04-29 Thread Tuklu Europe S.r.l.
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, wir möchten Ihnen heute Tuklu Deutschland vorstellen, die neue Website für Internet-Auktionen und Online-Verkauf. Tuklu gibt es seit dem 1. April 2010 in 18 Ländern weltweit und ist in sechs Sprachen verfügbar. Dank einer groß angelegten Marketing- und Werbek

Tuklu: die neue Website für Internet-Auktionen und Online-Verkauf - jetzt 6 Monate kostenlos inserie ren und verkaufen

2010-04-29 Thread Tuklu Europe S.r.l.
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, wir möchten Ihnen heute Tuklu Deutschland vorstellen, die neue Website für Internet-Auktionen und Online-Verkauf. Tuklu gibt es seit dem 1. April 2010 in 18 Ländern weltweit und ist in sechs Sprachen verfügbar. Dank einer groß angelegten Marketing- und Werbek