Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: ttf-takao (NEW)

2010-04-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Jun Kobayashi wrote: > If there are any changes, the name must be changed. So no patches are > permitted with the name "IPA Font". > > This is stated in Article 3 of IPA Font License: > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ipafont.html > > Josselin Mouette said this

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: ttf-takao (NEW)

2010-04-02 Thread Jun Kobayashi
Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Jun Kobayashi wrote: > >> If we are permitted to patch the IPA Fonts itself or the upstream is >> open and release fixed version quickly considering our request, it's >> better to work with the upstream and make IPA Fonts better. > > Since the

"pdebuild --debbuildopts -sa" does not accept orig.tar.bz2 format?

2010-04-02 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hello mentors, I would like upload package builded in pbuilder and force pbuilder to use orig file For _.orig.tar.gz "pdebuild --debbuildopts -sa" works. But not for _.orig.tar.bz2 ... orig file is not included. I would like use orig.tar.bz2 format because upstream source is also tar.bz2 and thi

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: ttf-takao (NEW)

2010-04-02 Thread Jun Kobayashi
Hi, Thank you for your comment. Paul Wise wrote: > Do we really need two versions of the same font in Debian? Would it > not be better for you to work with otf-ipafont upstream and get your > changes added there? If we are permitted to patch the IPA Fonts itself or the upstream is open and rele

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: ttf-takao (NEW)

2010-04-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Jun Kobayashi wrote: > If we are permitted to patch the IPA Fonts itself or the upstream is > open and release fixed version quickly considering our request, it's > better to work with the upstream and make IPA Fonts better. Since the package is in Debian main, p

RFS: springpython

2010-04-02 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Hi mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "springpython". * Package name: springpython Version : 1.1.0.M2-1 Upstream Author : Greg L. Turnquist * URL : http://springpython.webfactional.com/ * License : Apache-2.0 and others Section : pyth

Re: RFS: hivex

2010-04-02 Thread Paul Wise
The patches do not get applied when unpacking the source package, you are missing a debian/patches/series file. Since you are patching Makefile.am files, you need to run automake and clean up afterwards. In addition, if you can, please be more specific with the forwarded field in patches. I imagi

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFS: ttf-takao (NEW)

2010-04-02 Thread Paul Wise
Do we really need two versions of the same font in Debian? Would it not be better for you to work with otf-ipafont upstream and get your changes added there? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "uns

Re: RFS: coffeescript

2010-04-02 Thread Geza Kovacs
On 04/02/2010 05:42 AM, Christoph Egger wrote: >> I've added descriptions to the patches, as recommended by DEP-3. I'm not >> forwarding the patches upstream, as they mostly relate to >> debian-specific quirks and are not generally useful (specifically, one >> deals with Node.js being installed to

Re: RFS: hivex

2010-04-02 Thread TJ
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 12:00 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > A review of your package: Great, thanks. As a result I've learned a lot about areas of Debian packaging I've never really needed to master before, but I've got a headache and vacant expression to go with it :) I've uploaded 1.2.1-2 to mentors

Re: RFS: shtool (updated package)

2010-04-02 Thread William Vera
Hello Mentors I'm still looking for an uploader, I would appreciate any help Tthanks! Regards! On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:41 AM, William Vera wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.8-4 > of my package "shtool". > > It builds these binary packages: > shtool

Re: RFS: drpython (updated package)

2010-04-02 Thread William Vera
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Christoph Egger wrote: > Hi! Hello! > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:35:07PM -0600, William Vera wrote: >> It builds these binary packages: >> drpython   - simple and customizable editor for the Python language >> >> The upload would fix these bugs: 575845 >> >> - d

RFS: ttf-takao (NEW)

2010-04-02 Thread Jun Kobayashi
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ttf-takao". Package name: ttf-takao Version : 003.02.01-1 Upstream Author : Takao Fonts Maintainers URL : https://launchpad.net/takao-fonts License : IPA Font License (as same as otf-ipafont, it has

Re: RFS: django-auth-ldap

2010-04-02 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 07:39:09PM +0200, Fladischer Michael wrote: > > > * Your debian/pyversions says 2.5- is there any reason for that? The > >package docs say 2.3- (not that the package is likely to live in a > >environment with anything pre-2.5 being default) > > I was assuming

Re: RFS: django-auth-ldap

2010-04-02 Thread Fladischer Michael
Hello Christoph, Christoph Egger, 2010-04-02 11:33: > * Do you really need to build-depend on python-ldap? The package >seems to build quite the same without. You are right, I was under the impression that it's needed during the tests but it uses a mockup. Removed it fom B-D. > * Your dh_p

Re: Advice needed on splitting a package

2010-04-02 Thread Jason Heeris
Okay, so I've narrowed things down a bit, converted from CDBS to debhelper as per the general sentiment, and my progress can be seen in the python-modules repo[1]. Building the package results in the correct debs for the extensions (ie. anything with a .install file). But debhelper doesn't install

Re: correctly upgrading a package's source format to 3.0(quilt)

2010-04-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:03 PM, wrote: > Also, performing repackaging INSIDE debian/rules should be avoided, I > guess. Actually a debian/rules get-orig-source target is one of the more common ways to repack the upstream source to create an orig.tar.gz where nessecary. There are very few valid

Re: correctly upgrading a package's source format to 3.0(quilt)

2010-04-02 Thread jmroth+deb
Well, let's first speak in general terms: The facts are that .orig files should be UNMODIFIED upstream archives, and unless really necessary (whatever that means), should only be modified by patches (debian/patches), so that the modifications made to upstream are transparent to every package maint

Re: RFS: drpython (updated package)

2010-04-02 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:35:07PM -0600, William Vera wrote: > It builds these binary packages: > drpython - simple and customizable editor for the Python language > > The upload would fix these bugs: 575845 > > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drpython/drpython_3.11

Re: RFS: coffeescript

2010-04-02 Thread Christoph Egger
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 10:56:58PM -0400, Geza Kovacs wrote: > On 04/01/2010 12:42 PM, Christoph Egger wrote: > > > * Your patches don't have any description on them. I've missed such > >information quite often when adopting some package (there's some > >DEP for a uniform format somewhere

RFS: acgvision-agent

2010-04-02 Thread Rémi Debay
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "acgvision-agent". * Package name : acgvision-agent Version : 5.1.4-1 Upstream Author : Rémi Debay remi.de...@acgcenter.com * URL : https://launchpad.net/acgvision * License : Gnu GPLV2 Section : net It builds these binary packages: acgvis

Re: RFS: django-auth-ldap

2010-04-02 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi Micael! On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:50:04AM +0200, Michael Fladischer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "django-auth-ldap". > > * Package name: django-auth-ldap > Version : 1.0.3-1 > Upstrea

RFS: acgvision-db

2010-04-02 Thread Rémi Debay
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "acgvision-db". * Package name : acgvision-db Version : 5.1.4-1 Upstream Author : Rémi Debay remi.de...@acgcenter.com * URL : https://launchpad.net/acgvision * License : Gnu/GPL V2 Section : net It builds these binary packages: acgvision-d

RFS: django-auth-ldap

2010-04-02 Thread Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "django-auth-ldap". * Package name: django-auth-ldap Version : 1.0.3-1 Upstream Author : Peter Sagerson * URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-auth-ldap/ * Licen