Re: Lintian pickiness and packaging improvements

Rogério Brito writes: > On Oct 29 2009, Russ Allbery wrote: >> That was actually most of the point of pedantic. Minor possible bugs >> that aren't stylistic belong in info instead. That's why both of them >> are suppressed by default. > OK. Nice. Please keep them there. We can just treat them

Re: RFS:openpref (updated package)

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:34 AM, tangke wrote: >   Version : 0.1.3-1+nmu1 Why is this listed as a Non-Maintainer Upload (NMU) when you are the maintainer of the package? I strongly suggest you read the maint-guide, developers-reference and debian-policy before proceeding. -- bye, pabs

RFS:openpref (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openpref". * Package name: openpref Version : 0.1.3-1+nmu1 Upstream Author : annu...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/openpref/ * License : GPLV3 Section : games I

RFS:pokerclock

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pokerclock". * Package name: pokerclock Version : 1.0.4-1+nmu1 Upstream Author : xes * URL : http://www.xesnet.fr/ * License : GPLV3 Section : games It builds these binary packages: pokercloc

Re: Lintian pickiness and packaging improvements

Hi, Russ. On Oct 29 2009, Russ Allbery wrote: > That was actually most of the point of pedantic. Minor possible bugs > that aren't stylistic belong in info instead. That's why both of them > are suppressed by default. OK. Nice. Please keep them there. We can just treat them as pedantic and not

Re: Lintian pickiness and packaging improvements

Rogério Brito writes: > On Oct 22 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> Manoj Srivastava wrote: >>> I also think that style issues should not be a part of even >>> Pedantic checks. If a package is using a different, and arguably >>> better style, then lintian should keep its nose out. >> If

Re: Lintian pickiness and packaging improvements

Raphael Geissert writes: >> Pedantic tags are Lintian at its most pickiest and include >> checks for particular Debian packaging styles, *checks that are >> very frequently wrong*, and checks that many people disagree >> with. Expect false positives and Lintian ta

Re: RFS: csv2latex (updated package)

Hola ben! El 28/10/2009 a las 19:41 escribiste: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.16-2 > of my package "csv2latex". > It builds these binary packages: > csv2latex - a CSV to LaTeX file converter > The package appears to be lintian clean. > The package can be found on mentors.d

RFS: wxglade (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.3-2 of my package "wxglade". It builds these binary packages: python-wxglade - GUI designer written in Python with wxPython The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 501710, 533547, 537452, 552784

Re: RFS:openpref

tangke wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openpref". > > openpref - OpenPref is open source game > I did not look at the package, but let me start by pointing out that this description is essentially useless. First, no need to mention that it's open source.

request for review/sponsorship: gem-0.92.1-1.1

Dear Mentors, I kindly request you to review the package gem: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gem It builds these binary packages: gem- Graphics Environment for Multimedia - PureData library Changes - The package appears to be lintian clean. - The upload would fix these b

RFS:openpref

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openpref". * Package name: openpref Version : 0.1.3-1+nmu1 Upstream Author : * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/openpref/ * License : GPLV3 Section : games It builds these binary packages