Re: debian/watch

Ben Finney writes: > Also, in order to reduce the surprises, I prefer not to allow a > zero-length version string with ‘.+’. Instead it's better to have the > version part of the string specified as ‘.+’ so it's at least one > character long. That should be “… I prefer not to allow a zero-length

Re: Bug#354662: RFS: scrot (updated package)

El mar, 27-10-2009 a las 08:42 +0200, George Danchev escribió: > > I updated the package including the patch, is in the same URL in > > Mentors: > > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scrot/scrot_0.8-11.dsc > > Hi, Hello > I uploaded it with a slight change: used a hardcoded value

Re: Bug#354662: RFS: scrot (updated package)

> I updated the package including the patch, is in the same URL in > Mentors: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scrot/scrot_0.8-11.dsc Hi, I uploaded it with a slight change: used a hardcoded value instead of PATH_MAX (in 07 patch), since PATH_MAX (and _POSIX_PATH_MAX as well) ar

Re: Bug#354662: RFS: scrot (updated package)

I updated the package including the patch, is in the same URL in Mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scrot/scrot_0.8-11.dsc Cheers! El lun, 26-10-2009 a las 23:11 +0200, Yavor Doganov escribió: > Георги Данчев wrote: > > > This will lead to FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, where PATH_MAX is

Re: different package and source name

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > I am preparing package from 'lv2-c++-tools' source. It is library so I called > packages 'lv2-c++-tools0' and 'lv2-c++-tools-dev' > But I got this warning from lintian: > W: lv2-c++-tools0: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libpaq0 > > I renamed package

Re: debian/watch

> Od: Ben Finney > > Having watch file like this: > > version=3 > > > http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/ll-plugins/lv2-c++-tools-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 > > > > Can anybody advice why uscan cannot reach this source? > > Probably because the source specification is interpreted as a regex. As > well

Re: debian/watch

Jaromír Mikeš writes: > Having watch file like this: > version=3 > http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/ll-plugins/lv2-c++-tools-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 > > Can anybody advice why uscan cannot reach this source? Probably because the source specification is interpreted as a regex. As well as the peri

Re: debian/watch

Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hello mentors, > > I trying monitor "lv2-c++-tools" source on > http://mirror.lihnidos.org/GNU/savannah/ll-plugins/. > Having watch file like this: > version=3 > http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/ll-plugins/lv2-c++-tools-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 maybe, 'c\+\+-tools'? -- Eug

different package and source name

Hello mentors, I am preparing package from 'lv2-c++-tools' source. It is library so I called packages 'lv2-c++-tools0' and 'lv2-c++-tools-dev' But I got this warning from lintian: W: lv2-c++-tools0: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libpaq0 I renamed packages to libpaq0 and libpaq-dev. My quest

debian/watch

Hello mentors, I trying monitor "lv2-c++-tools" source on http://mirror.lihnidos.org/GNU/savannah/ll-plugins/. Having watch file like this: version=3 http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/ll-plugins/lv2-c++-tools-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 Can anybody advice why uscan cannot reach this source? I tested

RFS: mandos (updated package)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.14-1 of my package "mandos". It fixes a FTBFS bug on mips and mipsel. It builds these binary packages: mandos - a server giving encrypted passwords to Mandos clients mandos-client

debian-mentors@lists.debian.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.14-1 of my package "mandos". It fixes a FTBFS bug on mips and mipsel. It builds these binary packages: mandos - a server giving encrypted passwords to Mandos clients mandos-client

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)

Георги Данчев wrote: > > This will lead to FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, where PATH_MAX is undefined. > I think that using a hardcoded value of 1024 would be fine, Well, I haven't looked at the source, but it seems to me that #ifdef'ing your code block would be OK. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-men

Re: request for review: lbzip2-0.16-1

On Sun, 25 Oct 2009, Ruben Molina wrote: W: lbzip2: latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-version 0.16rc1 precedes 0.16 chronologicallly. You should have used something like 0.16~rc1 for the previous release. See the --compare-versions option in dpkg for the next time. Fixed, http://men

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)

> Георги Данчев wrote: > > +if ( strlen(argv[optind++]) > PATH_MAX ) { > > This will lead to FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, where PATH_MAX is undefined. You are correct. I think that using a hardcoded value of 1024 would be fine, though pathologically long file names (but still less than 1024

RFS: php-clamav

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "php-clamav". * Package name: php-clamav Version : 0.14.3-1 Upstream Author : Argos * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/php-clamav * License : GPL v2 or late

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)

Георги Данчев wrote: > +if ( strlen(argv[optind++]) > PATH_MAX ) { This will lead to FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, where PATH_MAX is undefined. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: piuparts, how to interpret logs ???

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 03:30:50PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote: > I don't understand how ucf can be unavailable has there is this in > debian/control file : > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ucf, libpcap0.8 (>= 0.9), libnet1 > (>= 1.1.2.1-3) > > So, it seems that ucf has and will b

Re: piuparts, how to interpret logs ???

On Mon, Oct 26 2009, Laurent Guignard wrote: > I don't understand how ucf can be unavailable has there is this in > debian/control file : > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ucf, libpcap0.8 (>= 0.9), libnet1 > (>= 1.1.2.1-3) > > So, it seems that ucf has and will be installed when dhcp

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)

Hello 2009/10/26 George Danchev : > tags 354662 patch > thanks > >> Dear mentors, > > Hi, > >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8-11 >> of my package "scrot". >> >> It builds these binary packages: >> scrot      - command line screen capture utility >> >> The package appears to be

Re: piuparts, how to interpret logs ???

Hi Laurent, On Montag, 26. Oktober 2009, Laurent Guignard wrote: > I would like to know how to interpret piuparts logs. > You can find in [1] and [2] information about package and logs provided > from Debian pages... > > Where can i find information about to solve the problem if needed ? > I searc

Re: piuparts, how to interpret logs ???

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:52:56 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:28:10PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote: > > > I would like to know how to interpret piuparts logs. > > You can find in [1] and [2] information about package and logs provided from > > Debian pages... >

Re: piuparts, how to interpret logs ???

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:28:10PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote: > I would like to know how to interpret piuparts logs. > You can find in [1] and [2] information about package and logs provided from > Debian pages... > > Where can i find information about to solve the problem if needed ? > I sea

Re: RFS: imagination (updated package)

On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 05:26:27PM -0400, Andrew SB wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1-1 > of my package "imagination". > > It builds these binary packages: > imagination - DVD slide show maker > imagination-common - DVD slide show maker - common files > > The package app

Re: RFS: uriparser (updated package)

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:58:51AM -0500, Taylor LeMasurier-Wren wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.5-1 > of my package "uriparser". > > It builds these binary packages: > liburiparser-dev - development files for uriparser > liburiparser1 - URI parsing library compliant wi

piuparts, how to interpret logs ???

Hi mentors, I saw the package i maintain, is a "piuparts victim" ;) I would like to know how to interpret piuparts logs. You can find in [1] and [2] information about package and logs provided from Debian pages... Where can i find information about to solve the problem if needed ? I search in go

Re: request for review: lbzip2-0.16-1

On Sun, 25 Oct 2009, Ruben Molina wrote: W: lbzip2: latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-version 0.16rc1 precedes 0.16 chronologicallly. You should have used something like 0.16~rc1 for the previous release. See the --compare-versions option in dpkg for the next time. Thanks. I think

RFS: libsort-naturally-perl (backported package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.02-1~bpo50+1 of my package "libsort-naturally-perl". It builds these binary packages: libsort-naturally-perl - Sort naturally - sort lexically except for numerical parts The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://m

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)

tags 354662 patch thanks > Dear mentors, Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8-11 > of my package "scrot". > > It builds these binary packages: > scrot - command line screen capture utility > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bu

RFS: furiusisomount

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "furiusisomount". * Package name: furiusisomount Version : 0.11.1.2-1 Upstream Author : Dean Harris * URL : https://launchpad.net/furiusisomount * License : GPL Section : utils It builds these