Re: .mo files in source package

2009-09-01 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno mer, 02/09/2009 alle 14.12 +0800, Paul Wise ha scritto: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Ludovico > Cavedon wrote: > > > are .mo file considered source, i.e. is an upstream tarball containing > > .mo files ok? > > > > Or is it necessary to have .po files? > > > > If .po files are necess

Re: .mo files in source package

2009-09-01 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-09-02 08:08 +0200, Ludovico Cavedon wrote: > Hi, > are .mo file considered source, i.e. is an upstream tarball containing > .mo files ok? Yes and no. They are not source, but shipping them is perfectly fine as long as you also ship the .po files. If you don't modify the .po files, you c

Re: RFS: oval-interpreter (updated package)

2009-09-01 Thread Pavel Vinogradov
Dear mentors, I'm still looking for a sponsor for my package "oval-interpreter". On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Pavel Vinogradov wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.5.25-1 of my package > "oval-interpreter". > > It builds these binary packages: > ovaldi  

Re: .mo files in source package

2009-09-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Ludovico Cavedon wrote: > are .mo file considered source, i.e. is an upstream tarball containing > .mo files ok? > > Or is it necessary to have .po files? > > If .po files are necessary, but available only via Mercurial, should I > get the  source from SCM, remove t

.mo files in source package

2009-09-01 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
Hi, are .mo file considered source, i.e. is an upstream tarball containing .mo files ok? Or is it necessary to have .po files? If .po files are necessary, but available only via Mercurial, should I get the source from SCM, remove the .hg* file and repackage it? Thanks, Ludovico signature.asc

Re: Issue with dpkg-shlibdepds

2009-09-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > If the library package also ships utility binaries or data[1], changing the > binary package name would not allow side-by-side installation since the > packages would still conflict. That makes the package fail to comply with Policy

RFS: evilvte (updated package)

2009-09-01 Thread Wen-Yen Chuang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.4.2-1 of my package "evilvte". (Programming language: C) It builds the binary package: evilvte The latest entry in the Debian changelog is: evilvte (0.4.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low .

RFS: aptoncd (updated package)

2009-09-01 Thread fabrice
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.98+bzr112-1 of my package "aptoncd". It builds these binary packages: aptoncd- Installation disc creator for packages downloaded via APT The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:

Re: Issue with dpkg-shlibdepds

2009-09-01 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 12:54:21 Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 07:45:53AM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > In <20090901055635.gc6...@glandium.org>, Mike Hommey wrote: > > >On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:03:06PM -0700, Joe Smith wrote: > > >> Another issue sprung up, though.

Re: RFS: libsockets

2009-09-01 Thread Leinier Cruz Salfran
El mar, 01-09-2009 a las 20:58 +0200, George Danchev escribió: > On Tuesday 01 September 2009 19:37:18 Leinier Cruz Salfran wrote: > > thanks for the tips .. actually I use "pbuilder --login > > --bindmounts /home/salfrancl --save-after-login" and after package > > creation I install/remove within

Re: RFS: libsockets

2009-09-01 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 19:37:18 Leinier Cruz Salfran wrote: > thanks for the tips .. actually I use "pbuilder --login > --bindmounts /home/salfrancl --save-after-login" and after package > creation I install/remove within the environment .. the line "lintian's > authors do not recommend runni

Re: Issue with dpkg-shlibdepds

2009-09-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 07:45:53AM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In <20090901055635.gc6...@glandium.org>, Mike Hommey wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:03:06PM -0700, Joe Smith wrote: > >> Another issue sprung up, though. What I need to be able to do now is have > >> libngi3 (0.8) and l

Re: RFS: libsockets

2009-09-01 Thread Leinier Cruz Salfran
thanks for the tips .. actually I use "pbuilder --login --bindmounts /home/salfrancl --save-after-login" and after package creation I install/remove within the environment .. the line "lintian's authors do not recommend running it with root privileges!" is because 'lintian' detects I'm using user '

Re: RFS: libsockets

2009-09-01 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 17:34:20 Leinier Cruz Salfran wrote: > El mar, 01-09-2009 a las 09:30 +, Yavor Doganov escribió: > > В Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:36:11 -0400, Leinier Cruz Salfran написа: > > > libsockets (2.3.6-2) unstable; urgency=low > > > > > > * Added debugging symbols package > >

Re: CDBS question

2009-09-01 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Zak B. Elep wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:23 +0300, Hai Zaar wrote: >> I have several patches for a package called varlkyrie. Some of these >> patches change configure.in and Makefile.am. I.e. I need to run >> autoreconf after applying patches. Following CDBS doc

Re: RFS: gforth (updated)

2009-09-01 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Peter Pentchev schrieb: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.0+ds1-3 of my package "gforth". This is an attempt to fix three different failures to build on mips, armel, and s390 respectively. It builds these binary packages: gforth - GNU Forth Language Environme

Re: RFS: poco (updated package)

2009-09-01 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 30 August 2009 20:37:13 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: > 2009/8/30 George Danchev : > > * it would be better to explicitly build-depends on zlib1g-dev > > Dependency add and new package uploaded to mentors.d.n. This is now uploaded. No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Thanks. -- pub 4096R/0E

Re: RFS: libsockets

2009-09-01 Thread Leinier Cruz Salfran
El mar, 01-09-2009 a las 09:30 +, Yavor Doganov escribió: > В Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:36:11 -0400, Leinier Cruz Salfran написа: > > > libsockets (2.3.6-2) unstable; urgency=low > > > * Added debugging symbols package > > > lintian's authors do not recommend running it with root privileges! >

RFS: gforth (updated)

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Pentchev
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.0+ds1-3 of my package "gforth". This is an attempt to fix three different failures to build on mips, armel, and s390 respectively. It builds these binary packages: gforth - GNU Forth Language Environment gforth-common - GNU For

Re: Issue with dpkg-shlibdepds

2009-09-01 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
First of all, TOFU is generally frowned upon as a posting style on technical mailing lists. Second, IANADD and TINASOTODP; I speak only for myself. On Tuesday 01 September 2009 08:55:45 Joe Smith wrote: > We're making a set of interface libraries for use in cross-platform > application developme

Re: RFS: nautilus-dropbox

2009-09-01 Thread Alice Ferrazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In <85c01b290909010539g4db763d2w52c90a1b68bc4...@mail.gmail.com>, Kartik > Mistry wrote: >> * debian/copyright: >> All images included in this package constitute data and are not licensed >> for you to use under the ter

Re: CDBS question

2009-09-01 Thread Zak B. Elep
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:23 +0300, Hai Zaar wrote: > I have several patches for a package called varlkyrie. Some of these > patches change configure.in and Makefile.am. I.e. I need to run > autoreconf after applying patches. Following CDBS documentation, I've > added these lines to debian/rules > m

CDBS question

2009-09-01 Thread Hai Zaar
I have several patches for a package called varlkyrie. Some of these patches change configure.in and Makefile.am. I.e. I need to run autoreconf after applying patches. Following CDBS documentation, I've added these lines to debian/rules makebuilddir/valkyrie:: cat m4/* > acinclude.m4 autore

Re: Issue with dpkg-shlibdepds

2009-09-01 Thread Joe Smith
Hi Mike, The scenario is this: We're making a set of interface libraries for use in cross-platform application development. We want to 100% guarantee that if an application is compiled against a particular version of the library, then it's guarateed to work indefinitely with the same level of fun

Re: RFS: nautilus-dropbox

2009-09-01 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <85c01b290909010539g4db763d2w52c90a1b68bc4...@mail.gmail.com>, Kartik Mistry wrote: >* debian/copyright: >All images included in this package constitute data and are not licensed >for you to use under the terms of the GPL. You may not use the images >included in this package for any reason othe

Re: Issue with dpkg-shlibdepds

2009-09-01 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <20090901055635.gc6...@glandium.org>, Mike Hommey wrote: >On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:03:06PM -0700, Joe Smith wrote: >> Another issue sprung up, though. What I need to be able to do now is have >> libngi3 (0.8) and libngi3 (0.9) installed at the same time. They don't >> share any binaries that a

RFS: trend (updated package)

2009-09-01 Thread Yuri D'Elia
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-2 of my package "trend". It builds these binary packages: trend - a general-purpose, efficient trend graph The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.

Re: RFS: nautilus-dropbox

2009-09-01 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-dropbox". Hi, Some comments from first look, haven't check/compiled it yet.. * debian/control: Section: unknown Why duplicate URL in extented description? Homepage is there to show it.

RFS: nautilus-dropbox

2009-09-01 Thread Alice Ferrazzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-dropbox". * Package name: nautilus-dropbox Version : 0.4.1 * URL : http://www.getdropbox.com/ * License : GPL for code, artwork is not free Programm

Re: RFS: update-inetd (98% popcon; closes ITA and 10 other bugs)

2009-09-01 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Serafeim Zanikolas schrieb: Hi Patrick, On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:46:08PM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote [edited]: W: update-inetd: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man8/update-inetd.8.gz 200: warning [p 3, 6.0i]: can't break line not much I can do about this, it's just a long line th

Re: RFS: dma (updated, bugs fixed)

2009-09-01 Thread George Danchev
Quoting "Peter Pentchev" : Dear mentors, Excellent reaction. No comments. Uploaded. Thanks! I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.2009.07.17-2 of my package "dma". It updates the packaging a bit and fixes two bugs from the Debian BTS - allows the spool directory to live on a fi

RFS: dma (updated, bugs fixed)

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Pentchev
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.2009.07.17-2 of my package "dma". It updates the packaging a bit and fixes two bugs from the Debian BTS - allows the spool directory to live on a filesystem like XFS that does not set the d_type field in the dirent structure, and ge

Re: RFS: libsockets

2009-09-01 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:36:11 -0400, Leinier Cruz Salfran написа: > libsockets (2.3.6-2) unstable; urgency=low > * Added debugging symbols package > lintian's authors do not recommend running it with root privileges! Indeed, so why do you do that? ;-) > I: libsockets2: no-symbols-control-file