Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.5.25-1 of my package
"oval-interpreter".
It builds these binary packages:
ovaldi - Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language reference interpreter
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 539893
On Monday 17,August,2009 04:46 AM, George Danchev wrote:
> [...]
>
I'm not
actually familiar with Code::Blocks, but I do feel that it would be nice
>>>
>>> Roughly Code::Blocks resembles MSVC face and look, and in my humble
>>> opinion intentionally targets that user base. Nothing wrong
> Hi George,
Hi,
> On Monday 17,August,2009 02:42 AM, George Danchev wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> I actually use a series of IDEs/editors hopping from one to another
> >> depending on my mood or purpose: emacs, geany, codelite.
> >
> > That is something I don't really understand, if not done for fun
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 08:51:33PM +0100, Harry RIckards wrote:
> Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 06:59:47PM +0100, Harry RIckards wrote:
> >> Also, the current standards version 3.8.2 not 3.7.3.
> >
> > 3.8.3 now ;)
> >
> >
> When was that updated?
Yesterday [1]. See the
On Monday 17,August,2009 03:51 AM, Harry RIckards wrote:
> Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 06:59:47PM +0100, Harry RIckards wrote:
>>> Also, the current standards version 3.8.2 not 3.7.3.
>
>> 3.8.3 now ;)
>
>
> When was that updated?
>
Taken from
http://packages.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 06:59:47PM +0100, Harry RIckards wrote:
>> Also, the current standards version 3.8.2 not 3.7.3.
>
> 3.8.3 now ;)
>
>
When was that updated?
- --
Thanks
Harry Rickards
GPG Key Info:
pub 1024R/5
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 06:59:47PM +0100, Harry RIckards wrote:
> Also, the current standards version 3.8.2 not 3.7.3.
3.8.3 now ;)
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
1024D: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C5
Hi George,
On Monday 17,August,2009 02:42 AM, George Danchev wrote:
> [...]
>> I actually use a series of IDEs/editors hopping from one to another
>> depending on my mood or purpose: emacs, geany, codelite.
>
> That is something I don't really understand, if not done for fun of course
> ;-)
> O
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "leo".
Package name: leo
Version : 4.6.2
Upstream Author : Edward K. Ream
URL : http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html
License : MIT
Section : devel
It builds these binary packages:
> Hi George,
Hi,
> On Sunday 16,August,2009 10:30 PM, George Danchev wrote:
> > [...]
> > I have some questions which might need a broader discussion, before we
> > proceed (I don't place any burden on you to answer them, of course, but
> > your opinion would be appreciated as well):
> >
> > It s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Eleven wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "khdrecord".
>
> * Package name: khdrecord
> Version : 0.8.0-2
> Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
> * URL : [fill in UR
Hola Ralf,
2009-08-16, Ralf Eleven:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "khdrecord".
>
> * Package name: khdrecord
> Version : 0.8.0-2
> Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
> * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
> *
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "khdrecord".
* Package name: khdrecord
Version : 0.8.0-2
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
Section : sound
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Ralf Eleven wrote:
> * Package name : convert2audio
> Version : 0.1.1-0ubuntu2
Perhaps you meant to upload this package to Ubuntu REVU instead of
Debian mentors?
> Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
> * URL : [fill in
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "convert2audio".
* Package name: convert2audio
Version : 0.1.1-0ubuntu2
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
Section
Hello,
the situation of the package denemo is perfectly described in the
following:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513285
Notice that today if a Debian user wants to use denemo, the best thing
to do is certainly to use the package at [1], as far as:
- you use i386
- you don't ca
Il giorno dom, 16/08/2009 alle 18.49 +0200, Pietro Battiston ha scritto:
> Notice that today if a Debian user wants to use denemo, the best thing
> to do is certainly to use the package at [1], as far as:
where [1] = http://mirror.lihnidos.org/GNU/savannah/denemo/debian/
Pietro Battiston
signat
> Reijo Tomperi wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cppcheck".
> >
> > * Package name: cppcheck
> > Version : 1.25-1
> > Upstream Authors: Daniel Marjamäki
> >Reijo Tomperi
> > * URL : http://cppcheck.wiki.sourc
Reijo Tomperi wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cppcheck".
* Package name: cppcheck
Version : 1.25-1
Upstream Authors: Daniel Marjamäki
Reijo Tomperi
* URL : http://cppcheck.wiki.sourceforge.net/
* License : GP
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.19.1-1
of my package "gnustep-base".
Programming Lang: Objective-C
It builds these binary packages:
gnustep-base-common - GNUstep Base library - common files
gnustep-base-doc - Documentation for the GNUstep Base Library
gnustep-base-examples - Exam
Hi George,
On Sunday 16,August,2009 10:30 PM, George Danchev wrote:
> [...]
> I have some questions which might need a broader discussion, before we
> proceed
> (I don't place any burden on you to answer them, of course, but your opinion
> would be appreciated as well):
>
> It seems like ther
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
First, thanks for the effort packaging such a beast. I didn't look at the
package properly (sorry, lack of time), but I had a look at your
debian/copyright which makes me think that you at least went through the code.
> The upload would fix these bugs: 516896
>
> The packag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Dear mentors/backporters,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.4dfsg-1~bpo50+1
of my package "subversion".
It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-svn - Subversion server modules for Apache
libsvn-dev - Development files for Su
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.0+bzr354-1
of my package "gwibber".
It builds these binary packages:
gwibber- microblogging client for GNOME
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bareftp".
* Package name: bareftp
Version : 0.2.3-2
Upstream Author : Christian Eide
* URL : http://bareftp.org/
* License : GPL
Section : gnome
It builds these binary packages:
bareftp- Fi
In article
<85c01b290908152319ye68a74cg7afbaeb6e8f34...@mail.gmail.com>,
Kartik Mistry wrote:
> > One option (which I never got around to evaluating) is Dogtail:
>
> You can also use LDTP aka Linux Desktop Testing Project. Package is
> available in Debian and upstream is very well supportive.
In article <20090816070114.ga3...@jwilk.net>,
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >make[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to parent
> >make rule.
> >make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
>
> I guess it's rather an instance of this bug:
> http://bugs.debian.org
Hello,
Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> I downloaded lenny and m on a lenny system
the package should be build on unstable. To have lenny underneath is fine, but
then
install a chroot environment that is sid. You should also become familiar with
pbuilder.
> now and will use quilt patch
using quilt
Hello kart
I downloaded lenny and m on a lenny system now and will use quilt patch
system
Thanks
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Bhavani Shankar R
> wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-2
> > of my package "xoscop
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-2
> of my package "xoscope".
...
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
It is not. Please check again.
Also, remove extra blank lines in debian/control and debian/rules. It
is good i
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-2
of my package "xoscope".
It builds these binary packages:
xoscope- digital oscilloscope
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/ma
* Paul Wise , 2009-08-16, 14:42:
debian/rules doesn't handle DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt or
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=N (see debian-policy).
Fixed.
I've also overridden CXXFLAGS, first to enforce that -Wall is always
present, and to push optimization levels to -O3 (the extra optimization
performe
32 matches
Mail list logo
