Re: RFS: libsockets++

2009-08-10 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Leinier Cruz Salfran writes: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsockets++". I'm not a DD, but can offer some comments on your package: 1. The library links OpenSSL, but is GPL-only. 2. There is no need to mention the license in the package description. 3. Current Debian Po

Re: RFS: libsockets++

2009-08-10 Thread Mauro Lizaur
Hola Leinier, El 2009-08-10, Leinier Cruz Salfran escribio: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsockets++". > > * Package name: libsockets++ > Version : 2.3.5 > Upstream Author : gry...@alhem.net > * URL : http://www.alhem.net/Sockets/ >

RFS: libsockets++

2009-08-10 Thread Leinier Cruz Salfran
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsockets++". * Package name: libsockets++ Version : 2.3.5 Upstream Author : gry...@alhem.net * URL : http://www.alhem.net/Sockets/ * License : GPL Section : libs It builds these binary packag

Re: RFS: python-iso8583 - library for ISO 8583 transactions

2009-08-10 Thread Mauro Lizaur
Hola Piotr, El 2009-08-10, Piotr Ożarowski escribio: > [Mauro Lizaur, 2009-08-08] > > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/python-modules/packages/python-iso8583/ > > full copy of GPL-3 is missing in upstream tarball, minor issues already > committed to the repo. from IRC #debian-pyt...@irc.oftc.net: 1

Re: Bug#539714: man mbrola mentions /usr/share/doc/mbrola/readme.txt

2009-08-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Cc-ing debian-mentors as I'm not sure how to tackle this. (yes it's a nonfree package but the question generally holds) Dr. Markus Waldeck, le Mon 03 Aug 2009 09:48:58 +0200, a écrit : > This manual page was written by Igor B. Poretsky , > for the Debian project but the mentioned page >

Re: RFS: python-iso8583 - library for ISO 8583 transactions

2009-08-10 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Mauro Lizaur, 2009-08-08] > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/python-modules/packages/python-iso8583/ full copy of GPL-3 is missing in upstream tarball, minor issues already committed to the repo. -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- signature.asc Description: Digital si

Re: RFS: libhtml-calendarmonthsimple-perl

2009-08-10 Thread Italo Valcy
Hi, Citando Ryan Niebur , em 09-08-2009: would you please consider joining the perl team? they'll sponsor your uploads. you don't need to know Perl. Well, you won... :-) I have been submitted a joining request for that group. King regards, -- Saudações, Italo Valcy :: http://wiki.dcc.ufba

Re: RFS: ognl

2009-08-10 Thread Hendrik Weimer
Matthew Johnson writes: > I don't like: > > * 5. Products derived from this software may not be called > * "OpenSymphony" > *or "OGNL", nor may "OpenSymphony" or "OGNL" appear in their > *name, without prior written permission of the OpenSymphony > *Group. > > since we are, arguably,

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-10 Thread Ben Finney
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI writes: > On Dom, 09 Ago 2009, Ben Finney wrote: > > You mean, the list should lie about the author of messages so that > > when you use the “reply to author” feature, it doesn't go only to > > the author? No, that's not a viable option. > > It doesn't need to change the aut

Re: RFS: me-tv (updated package)

2009-08-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 01:19:14PM +0200, Teis Dreijer wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.0-0+nmu1 > of my package "me-tv". I NMU this with approval of current/previous > maintainer and upstream developer Michael Lamothe. > > It builds these binary pack

RFS: me-tv (updated package)

2009-08-10 Thread Teis Dreijer
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.0-0+nmu1 of my package "me-tv". I NMU this with approval of current/previous maintainer and upstream developer Michael Lamothe. It builds these binary packages: me-tv - Me TV, it's TV for me computer The package appears to be

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-10 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
On Dom, 09 Ago 2009, Ben Finney wrote: You mean, the list should lie about the author of messages so that when you use the “reply to author” feature, it doesn't go only to the author? No, that's not a viable option. It doesn't need to change the author, only the "reply to" field. And yes, I've