Hi!
>there is already a package named
>‘tasks’ in Debian. Maybe you can
>consider finding a longer name to
>avoid confusions?
Ok. A longer name should not be a problem.
Any further comments on the package?
When changing the package name I would still work against the same ITP
bug report, wou
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 19:25 -0700, Daniel Moerner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Brendan Martens
> wrote:
> > Your change worked! : ) Thanks very much.
> > So if I understand this correctly... I need to edit debian/rules so that the
> > build section works as if I told make install to i
Le Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 03:10:48AM +0200, Federico Hernandez a écrit :
>Dear mentors,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "task".
>* Package name: task
Dear Federico,
there is already a package named ‘tasks’ in Debian. Maybe you can consider
finding a longer name to avoid c
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Brendan Martens
wrote:
> Your change worked! : ) Thanks very much.
> So if I understand this correctly... I need to edit debian/rules so that the
> build section works as if I told make install to install to
> debian/program_name, using DESTDIR?
Yes, you want to i
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "task".
* Package name: task
Version : 1.7.0-1
Upstream Author : Paul Beckingham
* URL : http://www.beckingham.net/task.html
* License : GPLv2+
Section : utils
It builds these binary packages:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8-1
of the package "obexpushd".
It builds these binary packages:
obexpushd - program for receiving files via Bluetooth or IRDA
The package is lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 458731, 490675, 527726, 529671, 531355
Th
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Unfortunatly I have to prioritize work for two weeks (and then 5
>> week vacation) before I can help. Maybe Loic can help you on this.
>> But after that the w
On 09/06/03 01:16 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag said ...
> On 09/06/01 16:47 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones said ...
>
> > The new package is in the same place:
> >
> > http://www.annexia.org/tmp/debian/
>
> I uploaded the package, with a couple of changes: changed the FSF address in
> debian/copyrigh
On 09/06/01 16:47 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones said ...
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:26:32AM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
[snip...]
> > Suggestions:
> >
> > - It is usually a good idea to maintain the debian packaging also in a VCS.
>
> I'm of course maintaining this package in my own VCS.
Your change worked! : ) Thanks very much.
So if I understand this correctly... I need to edit debian/rules so
that the build section works as if I told make install to install to
debian/program_name, using DESTDIR?
Brendan Martens
Server Administrator
CrossComm, Inc.
919.667.9432 ofc
919.
> In short if you want to adopt this package rename the RFA bug into ITA
> bug. Change the maintainer field to your name in the debian/control.
> And in debian/changelog mention that you are a new maintainer with
> Closes: #the_ITA_bug_number.
Okay, and then? Ill still upload to Debian Mentor and s
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Brendan Martens wrote:
Sorry your getting this twice Daniel, realized I didn't reply to list.
Thanks for the reply. This is what my debian/rules file looks
like: http://pastebin.com/f135b3d42
Is it normal to have to manually edit the rules file to make it run mak
Matthias Julius writes:
> Matthias Julius writes:
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0~beta2-1
>> of my package "krecipes".
>>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> krecipes - recipes manager for KDE
>> krecipes-data - recipes manager for KDE - data files
>> krecipes-doc -
2009/6/2 Dominik Bruhn :
> Hy,
> situation: The package obexpushd is RFA. It currently has some
> debian-related bugs and a security problem. There is also a new upstream
> version (not packaged but fixing the security problem).
>
> I got a new package ready, fixing all debian-bugs, updating to the
Hy,
situation: The package obexpushd is RFA. It currently has some
debian-related bugs and a security problem. There is also a new upstream
version (not packaged but fixing the security problem).
I got a new package ready, fixing all debian-bugs, updating to the most
recent upstream version and u
Sorry your getting this twice Daniel, realized I didn't reply to list.
Thanks for the reply. This is what my debian/rules file looks like:
http://pastebin.com/f135b3d42
Is it normal to have to manually edit the rules file to make it run
make install? The tweaks I tried on debian/rules was to
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:09:31 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Good catch. The DEP-5 is still in a pre-draft state, however. I think that the
> examples should be fixed in the following way:
>
> [..]
Please, remember to also support standalone License sections :)
> [..]
> Comment: On Debian systems
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:01:19 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
Hello Michal,
> Dne Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:34:10 +0200
> David Paleino napsal(a):
>
> > X-Comment: on Debian systems, [..]
> >
> > > For second (pedantic) warning, why did you use X-Comment field?
> >
> > To point to copies of licenses
Le Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 03:01:19PM +0200, Michal Čihař a écrit :
>
> All examples
> in DEP-5 have link to license in License field.
Good catch. The DEP-5 is still in a pre-draft state, however. I think that the
examples should be fixed in the following way:
Before
--
Copyright: 1998, John
Hi
Dne Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:34:10 +0200
David Paleino napsal(a):
> X-Comment: on Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General
> Public License version 3 can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3',
> while the latest version can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
>
> T
Hi all,
I packaged libasyncns-0.7 and python-libasyncns-0.7.1
I already have a DD for another package, so maybe he can upload them,
but if I can get some comments before I ask him, that would be
nice.
* Package name: libasyncns0
Version : 0.7-1
Upstream Author : Lennart Poetterin
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 09:48:10AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Peter Pentchev writes:
>
> > pslist - utility that lists, kills, or renices a process and
> > its descendants
>
> This is a good synopsis; my only note would be that it's a little too
> long. Perhaps this is better:
>
Hello,
i've searched for errors during make and figured out my program was compiled
with static library. Now i changed it to shared.
Now i don't know how to install the library. Do i have only execute or add to
Makefile:
$(SHTOOL) install -c -s -m 755 lib/libxy.so $(prefix)/lib/
or
$(SHTOOL) i
23 matches
Mail list logo
