On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Barry deFreese wrote:
> William Vera wrote:
>>
>> Hi mentors
>> some clue about this error?
>> Thanks
>>
>> 2008/7/11 William Vera :
>>
>>>
>>> Hello Mentors
>>> I intend update the Build-Depends at nemesis package, libnet0-dev to
>>> libnet1-dev (just changed at t
Andrea Bolognani writes:
> On Thu, 14 May 2009 18:11:38 +1000
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > Andrea Bolognani writes:
> > > The fix is a trivial one-line patch, so I was wondering if such a
> > > minor change could warrant a new upload.
> >
> > Many critical security bug fixes are trivial one-line pa
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:24:29PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Finally, if you don't know why it's not being fixed, feel free to
> > ask here or in #debbugs on irc.debian.org; mucking with the
> > found/fixed versions when the bug was actually foun
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:24:29PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2009, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> > Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
> > liferea's bug page?
>
> Because it's not -done.
Thanks, I get it now.
> Finally, if you don't know why it's not be
found 510765 1.4.1-1
found 510765 1.4.23-1
close 510765
thanks
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
> liferea's bug page?
>
> It's been closed in all the relevant versions, and the little graph on
> the left shows nothing
Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
> liferea's bug page?
>
> It's been closed in all the relevant versions, and the little graph on
> the left shows nothing but green boxes, but everything (the bts, the
> pts, my qa page) show liferea as havi
Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
> liferea's bug page?
>
> It's been closed in all the relevant versions, and the little graph on
> the left shows nothing but green boxes, but everything (the bts, the
> pts, my qa page) show liferea as havin
Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
liferea's bug page?
It's been closed in all the relevant versions, and the little graph on
the left shows nothing but green boxes, but everything (the bts, the
pts, my qa page) show liferea as having 1 open rc bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0~beta2-1
of my package "krecipes".
It builds these binary packages:
krecipes - recipes manager for KDE
krecipes-data - recipes manager for KDE - data files
krecipes-doc - recipes manager for KDE - documentation
Krecipes is a KDE
Dear reader of debian-mentors,
I read the following, following a discussion on debian-devel, which I
do not understand.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 04:26:56PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> brian m. carlson (14/05/2009):
> > I've worked on FTBFS-with-new-GCC bugs before, and realized only after
> >
LI Daobing writes:
>>> 3. consider remove the .la file if you already have a .pc file.
>>
>> Is that a policy/best practice for library packages?
>
> ok, consider there is no conclusion here. you can keep this file there. :)
But there seems to be a preference to remove it if rdepends don't need
LI Daobing wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:35, Monty Taylor wrote:
>> LI Daobing wrote:
>>
>>> 2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same
>>> file in memstat package[1], one solution is install it as
>>> memstat.libmemcached and document this in README.Debian
>>> http:
Hi
Dne Thu, 14 May 2009 21:09:03 +0800
Vern Sun napsal(a):
> reuploaded. the package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cconv/cconv_0.5.2-1.dsc
Uploaded, thanks.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
signat
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5+svn2078-1
of my package "ampache".
I have contacted my usual sponsor and he is unable to sponsor
ampache at this time due to other commitments. Here is a
summary of some of the new features.
- Video Streaming Support
-
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.0-3
of my package "drgeo".
It builds these binary packages:
drgeo - An interactive geometry software
This is the Gtk interactive geometry software. It allows one
to create geometric figure plus the interactive manipulation o
on 四, 2009-05-14 at 19:54 +0800, Michal Čihař wrote:
> I'm talking about versions, not about dependencies.
>
sorry about my poor english.
> - are all those versioned build depends really needed?
>
i am not sure about this, but i have removed the versions.
> - static library and libtool script sh
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:35, Monty Taylor wrote:
> LI Daobing wrote:
>
>> 2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same
>> file in memstat package[1], one solution is install it as
>> memstat.libmemcached and document this in README.Debian
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/m
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 22:47, Alejandro Garrido Mota
wrote:
> 2009/5/13 LI Daobing :
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:09, Alejandro Garrido Mota
>> wrote:
>>> Dear mentors,
>>>
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-4
>>> of my package "macchanger-gtk".
>>>
>>> It build
Hi
Dne Thu, 14 May 2009 19:19:19 +0800
Vern Sun napsal(a):
> on 四, 2009-05-14 at 18:11 +0800, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > - are all those versioned build depends really needed?
> >
> as you said "cconv man page is obviously generated, you should include it's
> sources and generate it during build".
on 四, 2009-05-14 at 18:11 +0800, Michal Čihař wrote:
> - are all those versioned build depends really needed?
>
as you said "cconv man page is obviously generated, you should include it's
sources and generate it during build". most of the depends are used for
generate man page.
> - there is no ne
Hi!
William Vera schrieb:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 15.3-2
> of my package "hwinfo".
Uploaded; many thanks for your contribution!
Best regards,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.75-1
of my package "fpm2".
The upload would fix those bugs:
#516196 Blowfish selftest failed: At startup password prompt.
Please try again.
Severity: important
#493317 is no lon
Hi
Dne Tue, 12 May 2009 23:26:40 +0800
Vern Sun napsal(a):
> on 二, 2009-05-12 at 17:02 +0800, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > - you should split the library to libcconv0 and rename devel package to
> > libcconv-dev
> > - please write useful description, pointing user to url is not a useful
> > descr
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>> Write a test suite and send it upstream.
>
> I won't write a test suite for Beef, or otherwise improve it, since I plan to
> rewrite it on top of the Cattle library[1] as soon as said library is mature
> enough. The library, however, alre
On Thu, 14 May 2009 17:22:06 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>
> > Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one of my
> > packages[1] has stopped working.
> >
> > The fix is a trivial one-line patch, so I was wondering
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one of my
> packages[1] has stopped working.
>
> The fix is a trivial one-line patch, so I was wondering if such a minor
> change could warrant a new upload.
No, however
On Thu, 14 May 2009 18:11:38 +1000
Ben Finney wrote:
> Andrea Bolognani writes:
>
> > Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one
> > of my packages[1] has stopped working.
>
> Which leaves your package with a new bug: a ‘debian/watch’ file that no
> longer works. Ri
Felipe Sateler schrieb:
> No. The cost of wasting buildd and user time has to be factored in. Not any
> bug is worth of making a new release for.
Not to forget bandwidth / transfer volume for our mirror network. Even for
arch: all packages uploads are not always justified.
Best Regards,
Al
Ben Finney wrote:
> Andrea Bolognani writes:
>
>> Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one
>> of my packages[1] has stopped working.
>
> Which leaves your package with a new bug: a ‘debian/watch’ file that no
> longer works. Right?
>
>> The fix is a trivial one-li
Hi!
Andrea Bolognani schrieb:
> Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one of my
> packages[1] has stopped working.
>
> The fix is a trivial one-line patch, so I was wondering if such a minor
> change could warrant a new upload.
IMHO this doesn't warrant an upload; b
Andrea Bolognani writes:
> Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one
> of my packages[1] has stopped working.
Which leaves your package with a new bug: a ‘debian/watch’ file that no
longer works. Right?
> The fix is a trivial one-line patch, so I was wondering if su
Hi mentors.
Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one of my
packages[1] has stopped working.
The fix is a trivial one-line patch, so I was wondering if such a minor
change could warrant a new upload.
Thanks in advance.
[1] http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/report.php?p
32 matches
Mail list logo
