On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> Hi Andrew, Benjamin,
[snip]
> First of all: they build fine in a clean cowbuilder and in an unclean
> sid environment, are lintian clean and seem to work fine (I'm not using
> GNOME, so I wasn't able to test the metacity theme, only the Xfwm
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 18:33, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> This is a big package with a high popcon count, do you have the time
>> for such a large task? On your own? Is there any upstream activity?
>
> I have the intention to try. And of course all help is appreciated, but
> I would say that any improve
On Tue, 05 May 2009, Hai Zaar wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Mauro Lizaur
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 05 May 2009, Hai Zaar wrote:
> >
> > So, in your case would be something like this:
> > http://code.google.com/p/pwauth/downloads/list
> > http://pwauth.googlecode.com/files/pwauth-(.+).t
--
Zaar
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Mauro Lizaur
wrote:
> On Tue, 05 May 2009, Hai Zaar wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:06 AM, LI Daobing wrote:
>> > 1. lintian warning:
>> > W: pwauth source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is 3.8.1)
>> Fixed
>>
>> >
>> > 2. $ uscan
>> >
On Tue, 05 May 2009, Hai Zaar wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:06 AM, LI Daobing wrote:
> > 1. lintian warning:
> > W: pwauth source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is 3.8.1)
> Fixed
>
> >
> > 2. $ uscan
> > uscan warning: In debian/watch,
> > no matching hrefs for watch line
> >
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> How do we get the template, that is still being used by dozens of RFS
> submissions, amended with some of the fixes discussed in many threads
> here in recent months?
The most obvious way to get this fixed would be to contact the people
runnin
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> I uploaded a new fixed version to mentors.debian.net
> dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/udav/udav_0.5.1-1.dsc
Some more things:
Some of the images in help/pics/ contain this comment but there
doesn't seem to be any s
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 13:04, Hai Zaar wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:06 AM, LI Daobing wrote:
>
>>
>> 2. $ uscan
>> uscan warning: In debian/watch,
>> no matching hrefs for watch line
>> http://code.google.com/p/pwauth/downloads/list pwauth-(.*)\.tar\.gz
> Can you help me create watch file
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:06 AM, LI Daobing wrote:
> 1. lintian warning:
> W: pwauth source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is 3.8.1)
Fixed
>
> 2. $ uscan
> uscan warning: In debian/watch,
> no matching hrefs for watch line
> http://code.google.com/p/pwauth/downloads/list pwauth-(.
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 14:49, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inosync".
>
> * Package name : inosync
> Version : 0.2-1
> Upstream Author : Benedikt Böhm
> * URL : http://bb.xnull.de/projects/inosync/
> * License :
Paul Wise writes:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > While that template is useful for prompting some of the information
> > needed in an RFS, it is still sadly deficient in some ways. How should
> > we report bugs and patches against it?
>
> Send a patch for debexpo to
Hello,
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 22:50, Hai Zaar wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pwauth".
>
> * Package name : pwauth
> Version : 2.3.8-1
> Upstream Author : Jan Wolter
> * URL : http://code.google.com/p/pwauth/
> * License : BS
Hello,
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 18:45, Hai Zaar wrote:
> Dear mentors,
> I've accidentally hit "send" button to early. I want to submit my RFS
> again with all fields filled in.
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "valkyrie".
>
> * Package name : valkyrie
> Version : 1.4.0-1
>
2009/5/5 Rogério Brito :
> Keeping the binaries is a good thing. One more point to use a
> virtualization solution for this. But also, is there enough space on
> mentors.d.n?
No idea there, I assume it is OK though.
>> I'd like a buildd network for mentors so we can check for FTBFS,
>> lintian w
0. Thanks (you know ... after months of trying and waiting!)
1. Everything fixed (except the point about -2)
2. The reason for continuing with -2 (and now -3) is that I thought it
would be better not to touch history of publicly-released versions,
even for those versions released only on mentors.de
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:36:03 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-colors".
This is just a note to other potential sponsors:
I intend to sponsor this one together with arc-colors and shiki-colors,
you can find my review in the "RFS: arc-colors" thread.
re
Hi Andrew, Benjamin,
On Fri, 1 May 2009 10:56:29 -0400 Andrew wrote:
> > BTW, I wonder whether gnome-colors isn't too generic for a package [that
> > is not officially from GNOME].
> >
>
> We debated what to use as the package names and in the end decided on
> staying close to the upstream name
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:43:46 +0200 Benjamin Drung wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shiki-colors".
This is just a note to other potential sponsors:
I intend to sponsor this one together with arc-colors and gnome-colors,
you can find my review in the "RFS: arc-colors" thread.
re
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 01:12:30PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Patrick Matthäi writes:
> > Russ Allbery schrieb:
>
> >> Given that anyone can upload packages to mentors, this seems like a
> >> fairly worrisome security risk.
>
> > Why that? It may be implemented as the current Debian buildd net
I should say that I'm quite proud of seeing more people discuss the
higher level proccess of mentoring and doing a pre-QA work (automated,
the way I brainstormed in an earlier e-mail) in packages entering
Debian.
For people having packages being sponsored, this is a highly educative
things and, fo
Patrick Matthäi writes:
> Russ Allbery schrieb:
>> Given that anyone can upload packages to mentors, this seems like a
>> fairly worrisome security risk.
> Why that? It may be implemented as the current Debian buildd network.
> OpenSuSE is also providing such a buildd service for their users, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russ Allbery schrieb:
> Paul Wise writes:
>
>> I'd like a buildd network for mentors so we can check for FTBFS,
>> lintian warnings etc on other architectures.
>
> Given that anyone can upload packages to mentors, this seems like a
> fairly worrisom
Paul Wise writes:
> I'd like a buildd network for mentors so we can check for FTBFS,
> lintian warnings etc on other architectures.
Given that anyone can upload packages to mentors, this seems like a
fairly worrisome security risk.
> I'd like to see our main archive require binary packages but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mohammad Ebrahim Mohammadi Panah schrieb:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "drraw". It is a simple yet
> powerful tool for producing graphs out of RRD files and showing them
> on the web.
>
> I guess I've done a tolerable
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Will/could/should debexpo require that uploads are accompanied with
> binaries, even if to throw them away after running eg. lintian?
> Additionally, would it be useful to keep them around, but available only
> for sponsors? I know myself I *
25 matches
Mail list logo
