Re: RFS: lv2core

> Od: Andreas Rottmann Hi, Thank you for great info it helped a lot, but there was troubles for me. > If you want to package stuff for Debian, it would be best (or rather > necessary, I'd say) to do so in a pristine Debian system. You can set up > a sid chroot easily with the cdebootstrap packa

Re: chroot

> Od: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl > >> process stay on line > >> > >> P: Configuring helper cdebootstrap-helper-apt > > Sorry for this question ... it is quite known issue > > > > Is there other way how to test .change file with lintian in sid e.g. > pbuilder? > > Yould either use "pbuilder --log

Re: chroot

Hi! Jaromír Mikeš schrieb: >> Od: Jaromír Mikeš > >> process stay on line >> >> P: Configuring helper cdebootstrap-helper-apt > Sorry for this question ... it is quite known issue > > Is there other way how to test .change file with lintian in sid e.g. pbuilder? Yould either use "pbuilder --lo

Re: chroot

> Od: Jaromír Mikeš > process stay on line > > P: Configuring helper cdebootstrap-helper-apt Sorry for this question ... it is quite known issue Is there other way how to test .change file with lintian in sid e.g. pbuilder? regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lis

Re: upload

> Od: Mauro Lizaur > > I uploaded package to debian.mentors and I saw fault in description. > > So I delete it, repair and tried upload again. > > Now I have problem upload getting messages for dupload: > > ok, already done for mentors ... Nothing to upload > Hi there, > try deleting the file e

chroot

Hello mentors, trying set up chroot sid environment here. After processing #cdebootstrap sid /path/to/chroot process stay on line P: Configuring helper cdebootstrap-helper-apt Just want to know if it is normal and I should continue set up chroot. Or there is something wrong. I am using this

Re: RFS: file-browser-applet (updated package)

Hi all, I hope this isn't a breach of protocol, but I just wanted to give this a bump. It's been more than two weeks since I submitted this updated package for review, and I'd still be grateful if some one would upload this for me. According to the mentors page, three people have downloaded the p

Re: RFS: parcellite (updated package)

Hi all, I hope this isn't a breach of protocol, but I just wanted to give this a bump. It's been about three weeks since I submitted this updated package for review, and I'd still be grateful if some one would upload this for me. According to the mentors page, five people have downloaded the pack

RFS: python-gtkglext1 (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.0-4 of my package "python-gtkglext1". It builds these binary packages: python-gtkglext1 - GtkGLext python bindings The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 478619, 519914 The package can be found