Re: RFS: hexer (adopted & updated package)

2009-04-02 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:50:09 +0300 Peter Pentchev napsal(a): > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.4c-3 > of my package "hexer". This is an adoption - ITA #520635. > The changelog entry describing my update to the Debian packaging of > hexer is included a bit further down. >

Re: RFS: hexer (adopted & updated package)

2009-04-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hexer/hexer_0.1.4c-3.dsc I'm unable to sponsor at the moment, but I took a look at the diff.gz. Please remove the lintian overrides, you should only override lintian complaints when the

RFS: hexer (adopted & updated package)

2009-04-02 Thread Peter Pentchev
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.4c-3 of my package "hexer". This is an adoption - ITA #520635. The changelog entry describing my update to the Debian packaging of hexer is included a bit further down. There's just one binary package: hexer - An interactive b

Re: how to support 32- & 64-bit versions of libraries

2009-04-02 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > "Steve M. Robbins" writes: > > I've run into a roadblock, however, in that the header gmp.h is > > generated by configure. It has some parameters (size of a limb) that > > depend on whether compiled for 32 or 64 bits. So on

Re: New upstream release

2009-04-02 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> > Od: Jaromír Mikeš > > > $ sudo pbuilder build clxclient_3.6.1-1.dsc than > > > > dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package > > (clxclient_3.6.1-1.dsc) > > dpkg-source: extracting clxclient in clxclient-3.6.1 > > dpkg-source: error: unrecognized file for a v2.0 source package: >

Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-auth-cas

2009-04-02 Thread Michele Baldessari
Hi Luk, On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 07:43 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Michele Baldessari wrote: > > So I removed the postinst change and changed dh_fixperms appropriately > > in trunk. Thanks for noticing and let me know if you'd like me to upload > > a 1.0.8-2 to mentors. > > Please do and ping me for u

Re: warning messages

2009-04-02 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
> Od: Chow Loong Jin > On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 19:51 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > I have some warning messages during build a package. > > Can somebody please look at them if they are serious? > > > > ### > > > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlsym used by > debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libsl

Re: warning messages

2009-04-02 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 19:51 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hello mentors, > > I have some warning messages during build a package. > Can somebody please look at them if they are serious? > > ### > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlsym used by > debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 fou

RFS: bindfs (updated package)

2009-04-02 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8.3-1 of my package "bindfs". It builds these binary packages: bindfs - mirrors or overlays a local directory with altered permissions The package is "lintian -ivI" clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: h

warning messages

2009-04-02 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hello mentors, I have some warning messages during build a package. Can somebody please look at them if they are serious? ### dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlsym used by debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries. dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlopen used b

Looking for hwinfo uploader, bug fixed (was: Bug#495866: hwinfo: library packages are needlessly not co-installable)

2009-04-02 Thread William Vera
Hello Mentors Somebody can help me to upload the new revision to close a bug? Thanks in advanced Regards! -- Forwarded message -- From: William Vera Date: Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:20 PM Subject: Re: Bug#495866: hwinfo: library packages are needlessly not co-installable To: debi

Re: Using a pbuilder hook to test install/remove process

2009-04-02 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Donnerstag, 2. April 2009, Ben Finney wrote: > Yes. My question is, though, is it a good idea to run the one within > the other? As I understand it, ‘piuparts’ does its work inside a > chroot; is it advisable for that to happen while already inside > ‘pbuilder’s existing chroot? not really

RFS: burn 0.4.3.ds1-2

2009-04-02 Thread Ben Finney
Howdy mentors, I am seeking a sponsor for my adopted package, ‘burn’. Package name: burn Version : 0.4.3.ds1-2 Upstream Author : Gaetano Paolone URL : http://www.bigpaul.org/burn/ License : GPL-2+ Section : otherosfs It builds thes