On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> Can I ask where I can find additional information about menu file?
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awww.debian.org+menu-policy
There is also a lot of information in the
/usr/sha
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> There is outdated link in maintainers guide for menu.ex.
> http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-dother.en.html
>
> /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/menu-policy.html/
apt-file search menu-policy.html
> Can I ask where I can find additional
Hello mentors,
There is outdated link in maintainers guide for menu.ex.
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-dother.en.html
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/menu-policy.html/
Can I ask where I can find additional information about menu file?
Thank you
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
> Od: Paul Wise
> > Is it allowed to solve this by editing-patching makefile?
>
> As the maintainer of the package, you can do as you please.
>
> As a sponsor of packages, I would consider your solution to be appropriate.
>
> I suggest you convince upstream to add your patch before adding it t
2009/3/24 Stefanos Harhalakis :
> The package consists of an init script, two initramfs scripts and two helper
> scripts, so I consider it to be 100% tied to debian and debian-based
> distributions. I cannot provide a set of scripts for other OSes and this is
> not an program that one can "install
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Is it allowed to solve this by editing-patching makefile?
As the maintainer of the package, you can do as you please.
As a sponsor of packages, I would consider your solution to be appropriate.
I suggest you convince upstream to add your
> Od: Paul Wise
> I didn't see any problem/question in your message. If any problem
> exists, I suggest reading the dh_install and dh_installdirs manual
> pages to solve it.
Yes ;) I am too hurry ... sorry
question is:
Is it allowed to solve this by editing-patching makefile?
regards
mira
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Thanks for any advice
I didn't see any problem/question in your message. If any problem
exists, I suggest reading the dh_install and dh_installdirs manual
pages to solve it.
This is good general advice for all people asking questions here,
Dear mentors,
I am building package with two separated binary packages.
First one is building application ... there is no problem
Second one should just install folder with some user-related config files.
(usr/share//config-files)
This folder is not normally installed by makefile but files are use
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> remove it in your clean target. since you're regenerating it, it'll be
> fine if it's not there already. and removed files don't show up in the
> .diff.gz.
>
> you should use dh_clean t(1)o remove it. (just add it to debian/clean if
> you're u
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 01:37:21AM +0100, Luca Niccoli wrote:
> Hi mentors,
>
> I would like to adopt grcm.
> I'm repackaging it from scratch, since it used a rules file I was not
> confident with and didn't have a patch system.
> I need to regenerate ./configure with autoconf; I'm doing it by
> p
Hi mentors,
I would like to adopt grcm.
I'm repackaging it from scratch, since it used a rules file I was not
confident with and didn't have a patch system.
I need to regenerate ./configure with autoconf; I'm doing it by
putting autoconf in the rules file.
The problem is that this way if I build t
> Od: Matthew Palmer
> Mixing packages from Ubuntu and sid qualifies as "crazy things" in my book.
> If you want newer libraries in your sid++ archive, then build them in sid
> and work from there (which I suspect you're now doing, based on info
> elsewhere in the thread).
Just trying to avoid
> Od: Jaromír Mikeš
> > #!/bin/sh
> > (cd /path/to/the/dir/deps; apt-ftparchive packages . > Packages)
> > apt-get update
sudo ;)
(cd /path/to/the/dir/deps; sudo apt-ftparchive packages . > Packages)
> > apt-get update
Now have warning :
W: no hooks of type E found -- ignoring
hope nothing s
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:38:16PM +0100, Jaromír Mike? wrote:
> > Od: Chow Loong Jin
> > I don't get it. debhelper should already pull in the appropriate perl. I
> > cannot even begin to imagine how you borked up your perl installation to
> > that extent.
>
> Neither me ... installation of ubunt
> Od: Kumar Appaiah
>
> Create a file called D05deps in your HOOKDIR (for me, in
> ~/.pbuilder/hooks). The file should contain:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> (cd /path/to/the/dir/deps; apt-ftparchive packages . > Packages)
> apt-get update
>
> Then, chmod +x ~/.pbuilder/hooks/D05deps and run pbuilder. It sh
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:06:14PM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
> On Sunday 22 March 2009 02:17:30 Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > Well, actually what I did was take this change, another couple of
> > things (the example files, a small fix to the testing framework), and
> > just go ahead a
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> > That is absolutely what I was looking for ...
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks
>
> Sorry , but one think I don't understand:
>
> HOOKDIR="/path/to/hook/dir"
This has to be set in your pbuilderrc. I have a ~/.pbuilderrc in my
home,
> Od: Chow Loong Jin
> You're packaging for what exactly? Sid? Jaunty? Intrepid?
Sid ... and I using pbuilder on ubuntu.
I upgrade library ... it is not in sid now.
Now I would like to build application ... but I need this library as
dependency.
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-men
> Od: Kumar Appaiah
> >
> > That is absolutely what I was looking for ...
http://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks
Sorry , but one think I don't understand:
HOOKDIR="/path/to/hook/dir"
# put a file like D05deps to your $HOOKDIR, make it executable and put this in
there:
(cd /path/to/the/dir/dep
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 23:38 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > Od: Chow Loong Jin
>
> > I don't get it. debhelper should already pull in the appropriate perl. I
> > cannot even begin to imagine how you borked up your perl installation to
> > that extent.
>
> Neither me ... installation of ubuntu ba
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> > If I will install newer perl from sid it will probably break my ubuntu
>> > here.
>> > I can't build in pbuilder coz missining dependencies.
>> > Can I somehow install manually dependencies to pbuilder chroot?
>>
>> The first section here
> Od: Chow Loong Jin
> I don't get it. debhelper should already pull in the appropriate perl. I
> cannot even begin to imagine how you borked up your perl installation to
> that extent.
Neither me ... installation of ubuntu based distro is quite new here installed
few packages from sid coz test
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> > If I will install newer perl from sid it will probably break my ubuntu
>> > here.
>> > I can't build in pbuilder coz missining dependencies.
>> > Can I somehow install manually dependencies to pbuilder chroot?
>>
>> The first section here
> Od: Kumar Appaiah
> > If I will install newer perl from sid it will probably break my ubuntu here.
> > I can't build in pbuilder coz missining dependencies.
> > Can I somehow install manually dependencies to pbuilder chroot?
>
> The first section here might help:
> http://wiki.debian.org/Pbuil
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:26 -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> 2009/3/23 Jaromír Mikeš:
> > If I will install newer perl from sid it will probably break my ubuntu here.
> > I can't build in pbuilder coz missining dependencies.
> > Can I somehow install manually dependencies to pbuilder chroot?
>
> The
2009/3/23 Jaromír Mikeš:
> If I will install newer perl from sid it will probably break my ubuntu here.
> I can't build in pbuilder coz missining dependencies.
> Can I somehow install manually dependencies to pbuilder chroot?
The first section here might help:
http://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks
> Od: Jaromír Mikeš
If I will install newer perl from sid it will probably break my ubuntu here.
I can't build in pbuilder coz missining dependencies.
Can I somehow install manually dependencies to pbuilder chroot?
thanks for advice
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@list
> Od: Chow Loong Jin
> > No I will use -fakeroot
> Actually I thought it was -rfakeroot
You are right ... thank you
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 23:07 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>
> No I will use -fakeroot
Actually I thought it was -rfakeroot
--
Chow Loong Jin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
> Od: tony mancill
> > Can somebody help me with this error please?
> >
> > $ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S
> > is runnig fine...
> >
> > $ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -nc
> > giving me this error
>
> Any reason you're using sudo instead of -ffakeroot?
No I will use -fakeroot
> Also, note that -S is
> Od: Craig Small
> > dh_clean -k
> > Undefined subroutine &Getopt::Long::GetOptionsFromArray called at
> /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Getopt.pm line 76.
> > make: *** [install] Error 255
>
> It's not your rules, it looks like your perl is missing a module or you
> are using an old perl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hello mentors,
>
> Can somebody help me with this error please?
>
> $ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S
> is runnig fine...
>
> $ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -nc
> giving me this error
Any reason you're using sudo instead of -ffakeroot?
Hello,
I'm replying using a copy of the message from google groups, so it is expected
to break threading. Please CC me in your replies.
On Monday 23 March 2009, v13 wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> Stefanos Harhalakis wrote:
> > I'll add it when it is available. Since this is a
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:23:24PM +0100, Jaromír Mike? wrote:
> dh_clean -k
> Undefined subroutine &Getopt::Long::GetOptionsFromArray called at
> /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Getopt.pm line 76.
> make: *** [install] Error 255
It's not your rules, it looks like your perl is missing a mod
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:41:48PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Stefanos Harhalakis wrote:
> > I'll add it when it is available. Since this is a debian native package,
> > I'm
> > waiting for it to enter debian (if it ever happens) before creating a page.
>
> Whis is this native? From wh
Hello mentors,
Can somebody help me with this error please?
$ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S
is runnig fine...
$ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -nc
giving me this error
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mira/BUILD/jconv2/jconv-0.8.1'
#docbook-to-man debian/jconv.sgml > jconv.1
touch build-stamp
debian/rule
On Sunday 22 March 2009 02:17:30 Peter Pentchev wrote:
Hello,
> Well, actually what I did was take this change, another couple of
> things (the example files, a small fix to the testing framework), and
> just go ahead and release a new upstream version, confget-1.02.
>
> A Debian package for it i
Stefanos Harhalakis wrote:
> I'll add it when it is available. Since this is a debian native package, I'm
> waiting for it to enter debian (if it ever happens) before creating a page.
>
Whis is this native? From what I understood of the package, there is
nothing Debian-specific in this package
At Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:06:16 +0900,
Hideki Yamane wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:28:46 +0900
> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > It's less easy to maintain patches.
> > How do I patch a file inside that tarball?
>
> Okay, it's not easy to maintain patches. Yes.
> But upstream is quite friendly for
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6
of my package "stardata-common".
It builds these binary packages:
stardata-common - Common framework to manage astronomy packages
This package allows the installation and removal of astronomy catalogues,
converting those catalogue
41 matches
Mail list logo
