Re: RFS: nast (adopting package, fixing important bug)

2008-12-10 Thread Ryan Niebur
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:53:40PM -0800, Daniel Moerner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:12:20AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> Hello Ryan, > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:18, Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: RFS: nast (adopting package, fixing important bug)

2008-12-10 Thread Daniel Moerner
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:12:20AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> Hello Ryan, >> >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:18, Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Dear mentors, >> > >> > I am looking for a sponsor for the

Re: RFS: nast (adopting package, fixing important bug)

2008-12-10 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hi, On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:12:20AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hello Ryan, > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:18, Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.0-5 > > of my package "nast". > > Here are my comments: > > - why

Re: RFS: vbetool (QA upload)

2008-12-10 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:26:34PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. a écrit : > On Wednesday 2008 December 10 17:07:06 Julien Lavergne wrote: > >- Since unstable is "frozen" for Lenny, I want to let the possibility to > >upload fixes in unstable for migration into lenny. > > That's not quite how I un

Re: RFS: vbetool (QA upload)

2008-12-10 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Wednesday 2008 December 10 17:07:06 Julien Lavergne wrote: >On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 16:49 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/vbetool/download/ shows that a 1.1 version >> is available. Since you don't seem to be targetting Etch or Lenny, what >> reason is there

Re: Regarding the debian package.

2008-12-10 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:36 AM, karthik ramalingam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone please let me know how should i do it. I already did the > procedure, but i am not getting anythin. Please upload the debian/ directory somewhere so we can tell you what you did wrong. -- bye, pabs htt

VCS-Git branch

2008-12-10 Thread Resul Cetin
Hi, how can I specify the branch in debian/control VCS-Git? The upstream branch is master and the debian branch has the name debian. I want that debcheckout will checkout debian instead of master. Thx, Resul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: RFS: vbetool (QA upload)

2008-12-10 Thread Julien Lavergne
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 16:49 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/vbetool/download/ shows that a 1.1 version is > available. Since you don't seem to be targetting Etch or Lenny, what reason > is there for not using the latest upstream? 2 reasons : - I don't know t

Re: RFS: vbetool (QA upload)

2008-12-10 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Wednesday 2008 December 10 16:19:23 Julien Lavergne wrote: >I am looking for a sponsor for the new revision 1.0-4 >of the package "vbetool". http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/vbetool/download/ shows that a 1.1 version is available. Since you don't seem to be targetting Etch or Lenny, what reason

Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-auth-cas

2008-12-10 Thread Luk Claes
Hi [Note: I'm not subscribed to the list, please Cc me in replies.] Your package [1] has a dpatch in debian/patches, but there doesn't seem to be any rule to actually (de)apply it nor any build dependency on dpatch? I thought dpkg-statoverride was meant to make it possible for the sysadmin to ov

RFS: vbetool (QA upload)

2008-12-10 Thread Julien Lavergne
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new revision 1.0-4 of the package "vbetool". This is a QA upload, fixing various stuff in the package. It builds these binary packages: vbetool- run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state The package appears to be lintian clean. T

Re: RFS: Airoscript

2008-12-10 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, David Francos (XayOn) wrote: > It has also "experimental support" for wlandecrypter and support for > mdk3, they are not dependences, since the program will still work > without them, but suggests (They add optional functionality). The > problem is they're not in debian. Will t

Re: RFS: Airoscript

2008-12-10 Thread David Francos (XayOn)
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:48 PM, أحمد المحمودي <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 01:06:55PM +0100, David Francos (XayOn) wrote: >> On 12/10/08, David Francos (XayOn) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > And about the grep version: lintian protests if I don't put any >> > version, it s

Re: RFS: Airoscript

2008-12-10 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 01:06:55PM +0100, David Francos (XayOn) wrote: > On 12/10/08, David Francos (XayOn) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And about the grep version: lintian protests if I don't put any > > version, it says something like it's a core dependency without > > version... > > I'm sorry

Regarding the debian package.

2008-12-10 Thread karthik ramalingam
Hi, I am trying to create a debian package file which will do the following operations. 1.Place some files in /etc/minicom directory 2. Place other files in /udev/ directory 3. Others in the home directory itself. Can anyone please let me know how should i do it. I already did the procedure, bu

Peer review of copyright files.

2008-12-10 Thread Charles Plessy
Hello everybody, Although it should never happen, sometimes a new package we submit to our archive managers is rejected because the description of the copyright status of its files is either incorrect or lacunar. This is waste of precious time for everybody. In order to ameliorate the quality of o

Re: RFS: Airoscript

2008-12-10 Thread David Francos (XayOn)
On 12/10/08, David Francos (XayOn) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/10/08, أحمد المحمودي <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Suggestions: >> * No docs are installed (except copyright & debian changelog), the >> reason is a typo in debian/docs: (it should be doc/* NOT docs/*) > Ok, thanks, I'll correc

Re: RFS: tuxcmd

2008-12-10 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:52:01 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > I reuploaded corrected version with copyright file again to mentors > repository. Uploaded. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: tuxcmd

2008-12-10 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > Dne Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:16:31 +0100 > Salvatore Bonaccorso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > > [ questions about right handling of copyright file ] > > > The wiki Proposal states "The copyright statement SHOULD include > > copyrig

Re: RFS: nast (adopting package, fixing important bug)

2008-12-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello Ryan, On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:18, Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.0-5 > of my package "nast". Here are my comments: - why are config.sub,guess changed in the diff.gz? If you replace them, please rm them in the

Re: RFS: Airoscript

2008-12-10 Thread أحمد المحمودي
IANADD, yet I find some issues in your package: 1. Your packages depends on grep (>= 5), yet the latest version of grep in Debian is something like 2.5. What's so important about grep version anyways ? 2. lintian -Ii gives a couple of other issues: I: airoscript source: debian-watch-file-is-mis

RFS: nast (adopting package, fixing important bug)

2008-12-10 Thread Ryan Niebur
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.0-5 of my package "nast". It builds these binary packages: nast - packet sniffer and lan analyzer The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 233993, 461243, 464012 The package can be found on