Re: RFS: esmtp (updated package)

On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 17:08 +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:18:55AM -0430, Jose Luis Rivas wrote: > >On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 04:55:55PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >>On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 05:23:19AM +, José Fonseca wrote: > The package can b

Re: RFS: nedit (QA updated package)

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 03:38:12PM -0600, Paul Gevers wrote: >I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:5.5-3 of the package >"nedit". The package is orphaned, I did a QA update. Uploaded. Cheers! signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: esmtp (updated package)

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:18:55AM -0430, Jose Luis Rivas wrote: >On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 04:55:55PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: >>On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 05:23:19AM +, José Fonseca wrote: The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debia

RFS: nedit (QA updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:5.5-3 of the package "nedit". The package is orphaned, I did a QA update. It builds these binary packages: nedit - A powerful, customizable, Motif based text editor The package appears to be lintian clean. The changelog contain

Re: Getting -m64 at the right time and place.

Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would the following patch make sense? > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index ad2f1e6..4f2993a 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -23,10 +23,7 @@ case "${host_cpu}-${host_os}" in > AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_L

Re: RFS: esekeyd (3rd try)

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 19:24, Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/11/15 Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Please fix these easy issues and reupload. > > Uploaded as 1.2.5-1: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/esekeyd/esekeyd_1.2.5-1.dsc Uploaded! Thanks for your co

Re: RFS: esekeyd (3rd try)

2008/11/15 Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Please fix these easy issues and reupload. Uploaded as 1.2.5-1: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/esekeyd/esekeyd_1.2.5-1.dsc Regards, -- Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.burghardt.pl/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Fwd: Re: RFS: bot-sentry

I'm pretty sure Tobias meant this for the list: -- Forwarded Message from Tobias Domhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- Subject: Re: RFS: bot-sentry Date: Saturday 15 November 2008 From: Tobias Domhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> oh I'm sorry. Up

Re: Getting -m64 at the right time and place.

Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maq is likely to have to access files bigger than 2Gb sometimes, so > I probably should not remove -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. Indeed. > Would the following patch make sense? Yes, looks reasonable to me. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, u

Re: RFS: poco (updated package)

On Saturday 15 November 2008 13:16:07 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3p1-2 > of my package "poco". Package uploaded. Thanks for taking care of these bugs. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 signature.asc Description: This is a d

RFS: libmsn

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libmsn", which is needed by Kopete in KDE 4.2 and newer for MSN Messenger support with off-line message support (MSN protocol version 15). * Package name: libmsn Version : 4.0~beta1-1 Upstream Author : Mark Rowe ([EMAIL PROT

Re: RFS: esekeyd (3rd try)

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 16:07, Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/11/15 Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> debian/compat: >> - please use a more up-to-date debhelper (either 5 or 7 is fine), 4 is >> a little old nowdays :) > > Changed to 7. but in control I still found "debhelp

Re: RFS: esekeyd (3rd try)

2008/11/15 Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > debian/compat: > - please use a more up-to-date debhelper (either 5 or 7 is fine), 4 is > a little old nowdays :) Changed to 7. > - uncapitalize short description: "multime..." Done. > - every 2.6 kernel is enough? if not, please clearly state it in

Re: RFS: esekeyd (3rd try)

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:22, Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:19, Krzysztof Burghardt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "esekeyd". > > Giving it a look. debian/compat: - please use a more up-to-date de

Re: RFS: esekeyd (3rd try)

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:19, Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "esekeyd". Giving it a look. Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wik

RFS: esekeyd (3rd try)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "esekeyd". * Package name: esekeyd Version : 1.2.4-1 Upstream Author : Krzysztof Burghardt * URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/esekeyd/ * License : GPL Section : misc It builds these binary packa

RFS: poco (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3p1-2 of my package "poco". It builds these binary packages: libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components libpococrypto6 - The C++ Portable Components Crypto library libpococrypto6-dbg - The C++ Portable Co

Re: RFS: libxml-simple-ruby (updated package)

Dear mentors, package has been reuploaded it adding the stub . Thanks dk On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 01:02:57PM +0530, Deepak Tripathi wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new versio

Re: Getting -m64 at the right time and place.

Le Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 08:37:49AM +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:37:55PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > However, as I do not understand the purpose of -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, I am > > worried it would be breaking maq on 32-bit arches to remove it. > > It will only bre