Re: [uploaded] Re: RFS: cppcheck (4rd attempt)

2008-11-09 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Monday 10 November 2008 01:12, Reijo Tomperi wrote: > I can close it if you can tell me how to close it? http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. [EMAIL PROTECTED]                      ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy

Re: [uploaded] Re: RFS: cppcheck (4rd attempt)

2008-11-09 Thread Reijo Tomperi
George Danchev wrote: On Sunday 09 November 2008 22:41:13 Reijo Tomperi wrote: --cut-- - Should I do something to the bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503730 This in fact is my fault, since I forgot to pass -v option to dpkg-buildpackage in order to include your

is statistical data extracted from web DFSG compliant?

2008-11-09 Thread Kov Chai
Hi everyone, i am working on a Chinese input method engine [1,2]. This input method engine is based on the statistical language model. We extract the language model from a 150MiB corpus collected from some choosed Chinese websites using a training algorithm. The extracted data -- the language mode

Re: RFS: wallpaper-tray (updated package)

2008-11-09 Thread Guido Loupias
Sandro Tosi schreef: Does the changes you'd like to upload start from 0.5.5-1 up to 0.5.5+svn7-1? If so, please merge all the changes listed in debian/changelog into the latest entry (hence 0.5.5+svn7-1) and reupload the package. Done. :) Uploaded under new revision 0.5.5+svn7-2. Regards, Guido

Re: RFS: wallpaper-tray (updated package)

2008-11-09 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello Guido, On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 23:17, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.5+svn7-1 > of my package "wallpaper-tray". Does the changes you'd like to upload start from 0.5.5-1 up to 0.5.5+svn7-1? If so, please merge al

RFS: wallpaper-tray (updated package)

2008-11-09 Thread Guido Loupias
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.5+svn7-1 of my package "wallpaper-tray". It builds these binary packages: wallpaper-tray - wallpaper changing utility for GNOME The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 325548 412083 326671 The p

Re: [uploaded] Re: RFS: cppcheck (4rd attempt)

2008-11-09 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 09 November 2008 22:41:13 Reijo Tomperi wrote: --cut-- > Few questions as I'm still new with all of this: > - In mentors.debian.net I have set the "seeking for sponsor" option to > "yes". Are you now my sponsor for the future updates also? Should I set > the value to "I have found a spons

RFS: ocropus (3nd try)

2008-11-09 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ocropus". * Package name: ocropus Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Breuel et al. * URL : http://code.google.com/p/ocropus/ * License : Apache-2 Sectio

Re: [uploaded] Re: RFS: cppcheck (4rd attempt)

2008-11-09 Thread Reijo Tomperi
Reijo Tomperi wrote: - Will the package now go to Debian testing? I don't see it yet on my mirror, but obviously it probably takes time to sync, but will it appear there after mirrors are updated? Obviously it will first go to unstable, and from there it will go to testing. -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: [uploaded] Re: RFS: cppcheck (4rd attempt)

2008-11-09 Thread Reijo Tomperi
George Danchev wrote: On Sunday 09 November 2008 21:49:52 Reijo Tomperi wrote: --cut-- http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.25-4.dsc Package uploaded. Thanks. Thank you very much. This happened a lot faster than the manuals let me understand ;) Few questions as

[uploaded] Re: RFS: cppcheck (4rd attempt)

2008-11-09 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 09 November 2008 21:49:52 Reijo Tomperi wrote: --cut-- > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.25-4.dsc Package uploaded. Thanks. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Re: RFS: cppcheck (4rd attempt)

2008-11-09 Thread Reijo Tomperi
Reijo Tomperi wrote: George Danchev wrote: OK, cppcheck should also build-depend on docbook-xml since xsltproc looks for /usr/share/xml/docbook/schema/dtd/4.5/docbookx.dtd (or the above I/O error occurs). You should always check your source package buildability in a clean chroot environment,

Re: RFS: cppcheck (3rd attempt)

2008-11-09 Thread Reijo Tomperi
George Danchev wrote: On Saturday 08 November 2008 20:47:58 George Danchev wrote: On Thursday 06 November 2008 17:31:29 Reijo Tomperi wrote: --cut-- What about the cppcheck package, you didn't give any comments about it, does that mean it is now perfect? ;) Package looks fine to me, although

Re: RFS: cppcheck (3rd attempt)

2008-11-09 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday 08 November 2008 20:47:58 George Danchev wrote: > On Thursday 06 November 2008 17:31:29 Reijo Tomperi wrote: > --cut-- > > > What about the cppcheck package, you didn't give any comments about it, > > does that mean it is now perfect? ;) > > Package looks fine to me, although I can't fi

Re: Preferred version format for svn revisions?

2008-11-09 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 11:20, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sandro Tosi schreef: >> >> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:45, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Could someone tell me if there is a preferred version format for svn >>> revisions? >>> Right now I have something li

Re: Preferred version format for svn revisions?

2008-11-09 Thread Guido Loupias
Sandro Tosi schreef: On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:45, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Could someone tell me if there is a preferred version format for svn revisions? Right now I have something like +svn. Here[1] you can find some information on this item, and on writing get-orig-source d

Re: Preferred version format for svn revisions?

2008-11-09 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:45, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could someone tell me if there is a preferred version format for svn > revisions? > Right now I have something like +svn. Here[1] you can find some information on this item, and on writing get-orig-source debian/rules target.

Re: Preferred version format for svn revisions?

2008-11-09 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2008-11-09, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Could someone tell me if there is a preferred version format for svn > revisions? > Right now I have something like +svn. If it is a snapshot after a release, I also do that. If it is a snapshot leading up to a release, I would

Preferred version format for svn revisions?

2008-11-09 Thread Guido Loupias
Hello, Could someone tell me if there is a preferred version format for svn revisions? Right now I have something like +svn. Regards, Guido Loupias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pbuilder/chroot problems

2008-11-09 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Sunday 09 November 2008 03:05, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2008-11-09 01:06 +0100, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > I attempted to to the chroot command directly, and got a bit more > > verbose output ending in: > > Setting up libc6 (2.7-16) ... > > sh: /dev/null: Permission denied > > sh: /dev/nu

Re: pbuilder/chroot problems

2008-11-09 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-11-09 01:06 +0100, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > I'm trying to set up a pbuilder environment on my laptop, and it's failing > with this error: > W: Failure trying to run: chroot /home/bss/debootstrap-test > dpkg --force-depends --install var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.7-16_amd64.deb >