I'm trying to set up a pbuilder environment on my laptop, and it's failing
with this error:
W: Failure trying to run: chroot /home/bss/debootstrap-test
dpkg --force-depends --install var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.7-16_amd64.deb
I tried etch instead of sid, thinking it might be some unstable bre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.2-1 of my package
"mandos".
* Package name: mandos
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Björn Påhlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Teddy Hogeborn <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL
Hello,
Sorry for my limited English skill.
I will try to explain better.
I am not a licensing expert, so I _guess_ that as the source code was
licensed under a different one some years ago, it may "carry" some kind
of potential liability from that date, in an theoric situation of a
fork, for examp
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "premake".
* Package name: premake
Version : 3.7-1.1
Upstream Author : Jason Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://premake.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Section : devel
It builds these bi
2008/11/8 Andre Felipe Machado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> From 15 November 2000, the Qt licensing was not used anymore, but should
> it be left there from a potential liability for an old version?
Could you elborate on why you think that "it [should] be left there
from a potential liability for an old
On Thursday 06 November 2008 17:31:29 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
--cut--
> What about the cppcheck package, you didn't give any comments about it,
> does that mean it is now perfect? ;)
Package looks fine to me, although I can't figure out why xsltproc warns like
that [0] when -nonet option were passed
Hello,
Please, help me to understand the bug report [0].
From 15 November 2000, the Qt licensing was not used anymore, but should
it be left there from a potential liability for an old version?
I guess that the copyright file should be left as is, registering the
conditions at time line.
What is th
On Saturday 08 November 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> In my opinion, you should just invoke the configure script with the
> paths of all programs as they are found in Debian, eg.:
>
> % ./configure --with-tar=/bin/tar --with-postgresql=/foo
After accepting the parameters it verifies their validit
* Stefanos Harhalakis [Sat, 08 Nov 2008 13:51:28 +0200]:
> On Saturday 08 November 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > In my opinion, you should just invoke the configure script with the
> > paths of all programs as they are found in Debian, eg.:
> > % ./configure --with-tar=/bin/tar --with-postgres
Hello dear mentors.
I've packaged latexdiff (ITP:#469460), a small utilty to generate friendly
latex file that contains the annotated diff of the versions of the same
document. Very useful for non technical ppl.
You can access the git repo here:
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/munga-guest/latexdif
* Stefanos Harhalakis [Sat, 08 Nov 2008 12:10:49 +0200]:
> Dear mentors,
> I've come up to a situation that I'm not sure how to handle. A package that
> I created and packaged, named 'vbackup', is included in debian unstable [1]
> under the sponsoring of Vincent Bernat (hi Vincent). After get
Dear mentors,
I've come up to a situation that I'm not sure how to handle. A package that
I created and packaged, named 'vbackup', is included in debian unstable [1]
under the sponsoring of Vincent Bernat (hi Vincent). After getting it from
the unstable repository I realised that it doesn't w
On Saturday 08 November 2008, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I've come up to a situation that I'm not sure how to handle. A package
[...]
Sorry for replying to self. I forgot something important:
Please CC me in replies!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
13 matches
Mail list logo
