On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 17:20 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Hi Charlie,
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:57:09AM -0500, Charliej wrote:
> > I have been thinking about this quite a bit, and you are absolutely
> > correct. Upstreams documentation is sourly lacking. I asked myself the
> > question
Mauro Lizaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22/09/2008):
> BTW, if you sponsor this package, the only thing left is to contact
> RMs explaining the situation, right?
Mostly, yes.
> [0] http://lusers.com.ar/packages/python-osd_0.2.14-4.dsc
Hmm, many remarks:
- debian/rules modifications aren't documented
Am Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:06:59 +0200
schrieb "Jeffrey Ratcliffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ocropus
> - - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
> unstable main contrib non-fr
On Sunday 21 September 2008, you wrote:
> On Sunday 21 September 2008 16:36:21 Michael Renner wrote:
> > Moin,
>
> Guten Tag,
Moin,
> > I managed to build a font package that installs and uninstalls without
> > problems. Therefor I checked how the xfont-base package works. But while
> > there is
Hello,
there seems to be no interest in my package, but I will continue providing
updates to this list. Below is my proposal of debian/copyright.
Yours sincerely,
Ferdinand
Format-Specification:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat?action=recall&rev=
Hello,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> P.S: I also had hard time doing a backport of the Lenny version of
> apt-cacher that depends on so many packages to be backported.
You can use "schroot" or "chroot" to run the lenny version of
software under etch (for example http://linuxgazette
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I just use squid and it works like charm.
>
>
> regards,
> Holger
I has a quite long discussion with my employee about it, and I really
don't think that Squid is appropriate. First, I would have to deal with
many ACL to make it limited to the Debian r
Hi Charlie,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:57:09AM -0500, Charliej wrote:
> I have been thinking about this quite a bit, and you are absolutely
> correct. Upstreams documentation is sourly lacking. I asked myself the
> question "If I was the end user would I use something so poorly
> documented" and
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> If you don't find a sponsor, you're welcome to get back to me tomorrow
> or so.
>
> Mraw,
> KiBi.
Hi KiBi,
i've just updated the package, you may find it here [0], also I updated
the severity to 'serious' and I'm sending a commit to the DPMT too.
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 11:46 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Charliej wrote:
> > That depends on what your definition of what "mature" is? If you mean
> > "mature" as in will the software do what it's suppose to do then yes.
> > If you mean "mature" as in time then probable not.
>
> ma
Hi Thomas,
I just use squid and it works like charm.
regards,
Holger
pgp2SZFG4JDaU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 01:14:42PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> We've been using apt-proxy for about a year, and then found it quite
> buggy. So we moved to using apt-cacher. Now we have loads of problems
> with apt-cacher as well (like currently, a recurring tzdata size
> mismatch error). I was
Kel Modderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22/09/2008):
> > BTW, Since the bug in the previous revision practically renders
> > pyosd unusable, in order to have the chance to update this package
> > on Lenny would be OK to change the severity from 'normal' to
> > 'important' and/or the urgency to 'high'?
Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21/09/2008):
> as you may know, I'm going to be more available nowadays. :)
As discussed, please people hold on, and don't upload it, since the
package name is going to change.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 01:14:42PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> mismatch error). I was wondering if approx is any better than the other
> two. Did any of you try?
I made similar observations with the use of apt-cacher and apt-proxy and
therefore switched to approx. This is working like a ch
On Monday 22 September 2008 17:14:02 Mauro Lizaur wrote:
> Hello Mentors and DPMT,
>
> I'd like to know if somebody is interested on reviewing
> (and eventually uploading) my package python-osd [0].
> This revision would fix the bug #497768 [1] also it would remove
> an unnecessary dependency on p
On Mon, September 22, 2008 08:11, Kel Modderman wrote:
> On Monday 22 September 2008 15:20:20 Cameron Dale wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We've been using apt-proxy for about a year, and then found it quite
>>> buggy. So we moved to
Hello Mentors and DPMT,
I'd like to know if somebody is interested on reviewing
(and eventually uploading) my package python-osd [0].
This revision would fix the bug #497768 [1] also it would remove
an unnecessary dependency on python-simplejson [*], and I've
already made a commit to the DPMT SVN
18 matches
Mail list logo
