Re: how indicate that a kernel module package is obsolete?

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:39:44PM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote: > I maintain a kernel module package (eeepc-acpi-source) that has been > merged into the mainline Linux kernel as of version 2.6.26, and has > had features added, bugs fixed, etc. > > The standalone module is still useful for the 2.6.25

Re: RFS: sqlline

Hi Cyril, Mentors and Java packagers, I've uploaded a new sqlline package to mentors which : * Recommends JDBC drivers as alternatives * Add a note in debian/README.source for vestigious LICENCE file (see #491805) * Remove unneeded "export" in debian/rules The package can be donwloaded with : - U

how indicate that a kernel module package is obsolete?

I maintain a kernel module package (eeepc-acpi-source) that has been merged into the mainline Linux kernel as of version 2.6.26, and has had features added, bugs fixed, etc. The standalone module is still useful for the 2.6.25 kernel, but will be unnecessary in lenny+1. I'd like to somehow indica

RFS: gcal (updated package, QA Upload)

Dear mentors/QA group, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.01.1-7 of package "gcal". It builds these binary packages: gcal - program for calculating and printing calendars The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 210760 The package can be fou

Re: RFS: openttd (updated package)

Hi, On Wednesday 13 August 2008 00:41, Andreas Wenning wrote: > You should add a debian/watch file to the package. Due to the RC/beta > packages at the site the content of the file should probably look > something like (possibly improvable): > > version=3 > opts="uversionmangle=s/-(alpha|beta|RC)/