Re: RFS: wmaker-data (updated package)

NDTTo> Dear mentors, NDTTo> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9~1-1 NDTTo> of my package "wmaker-data". NDTTo> The lintian failure is the same as in previous version 0.8-3 and it's NDTTo> being addressed, to close #490538. See README.debian for details. NDTTo> It builds these bin

RFS: metacity-themes (updated package)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.10 of my package "metacity-themes". It builds these binary packages: metacity-themes - Themes for the Gtk2 metacity window manager The upload would fix these bugs: 363341, 435626, 4778

Absence

Hello mentors and mentees, Just a quick note to say that I will be away until the 18th of August. Any comments on the few packages I have awaiting upload would be greatly appreciated but, naturally, won't be acted on until I get back. Regards, -- Daniel Watkins (Odd_Bloke) signature.asc Descri

Re: Preferred way to do a chown on package's dirs ?

Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07/08/2008): > I'm surprised that this doesn't work. Shouldn't fakeroot handle this > case and do the right thing? Or am I confused about what fakeroot is > capable of? First guess would be missing -X in dh_fixperms call. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description

Re: Preferred way to do a chown on package's dirs ?

On Thu, 07 Aug 2008, Russ Allbery wrote: > I'm surprised that this doesn't work. Shouldn't fakeroot handle this > case and do the right thing? Or am I confused about what fakeroot is > capable of? It handles it no problem: $ id -u; fakeroot sh -c 'touch foo; chown www-data foo; stat -c %u foo; rm

Re: Preferred way to do a chown on package's dirs ?

Olivier Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > May it also be done in the debian/rules ? > For instance something like : > install: build > dh_testdir > dh_testroot > dh_clean -k > dh_installdirs > dh_install > install -m 750 -o www-data -g www-data -d > debian/w

Re: Preferred way to do a chown on package's dirs ?

"Dmitry E. Oboukhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > group www-data may be absent on buildd I should certainly hope not, given that it's in base-passwd. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

RFS: wmaker-data (updated package)

From: Noel David Torres Taño <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: wmaker-data (updated package) Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9~1-1 of my package "wmaker-data". The lintian failure is the same as in previous version 0.8-3 and it's

Re: Subject: RFS: amule-emc

> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/amule-emc > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > main contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/amule-emc/amule-emc_0.5.2-1.dsc

Re: Preferred way to do a chown on package's dirs ?

On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 03:12:42PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > Hi. > > I'm not sure I can find authoritative information on how a packager > should change the ownership (chown) of a shipped directory. > > Of course this can be done in the package's postinst. As already noted, it *has* to be in

Re: Preferred way to do a chown on package's dirs ?

Hi, On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:12:42 +0200 Olivier Berger wrote: > I'm not sure I can find authoritative information on how a packager > should change the ownership (chown) of a shipped directory. Not at all in the best case ;) (But yours seems okay to me) > Of course this can be done in the packag

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uploaded, thanks for your contribution :) Forgot to say: for future uploads, please contact this list and I'll upload if I have time, or someone else will. Hopefully Patrick will soon be a DD so he can do the same. -- bye,

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

Uploaded, thanks for your contribution :) For the next upstream version, there appear to be several typos in the manual page, including a couple in the command-line options. In addition, the lauch script appears to contain no bashisms, so it should use /bin/sh instead of /bin/bash, please get thi

Re: Preferred way to do a chown on package's dirs ?

OB> I'm not sure I can find authoritative information on how a packager OB> should change the ownership (chown) of a shipped directory. OB> Of course this can be done in the package's postinst. OB> May it also be done in the debian/rules ? OB> For instance something like : OB> install: build OB>

Re: Preferred way to do a chown on package's dirs ?

Le Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 03:12:42PM +0200, Olivier Berger a écrit : > Hi. > > I'm not sure I can find authoritative information on how a packager > should change the ownership (chown) of a shipped directory. > > Of course this can be done in the package's postinst. It may actually have to, if the

Preferred way to do a chown on package's dirs ?

Hi. I'm not sure I can find authoritative information on how a packager should change the ownership (chown) of a shipped directory. Of course this can be done in the package's postinst. May it also be done in the debian/rules ? For instance something like : install: build dh_testdir

RFS: secpanel (2nd attempt - updated package - ITA )

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.5.4-1 of my package "secpanel". It builds these binary packages: secpanel - graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 175738, 289151, 305134, 305135, 31706

Re: Same file in two packages

El Thursday 07 August 2008 09:26:44 Robert Collins escribió: > On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 03:27 +0200, Noel David Torres Taño wrote: > > Dear mentors: > > > > File /usr/share/icons/wmaker-GNUstep.xpm from package wmaker-data I've > > recently adopted and file /usr/share/WindowMaker/Icons/GNUstep.xpm f

Re: RFS: trac (updated package)

Hi Luis, [...] (trac uploaded to mentors) It seems that trac is team-maintained, and some members of the team are indeed DDs. So, why don't these sponsor the upload? I'd offer to take a look at the package and sponsor the upload if it looks alright, but just don't want to interfere with the team.

Re: Same file in two packages

On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 03:27 +0200, Noel David Torres Taño wrote: > Dear mentors: > > File /usr/share/icons/wmaker-GNUstep.xpm from package wmaker-data I've > recently adopted and file /usr/share/WindowMaker/Icons/GNUstep.xpm from > package wmaker are exactly the same, bit by bit. Since wmaker su