On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Patrick Schoenfeld
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now I'm satisfied with your package, except the missing sentence in the
> copyright file. So I'm recommending to upload the package to my
> Application Manager Paul.
>
> Paul, is this package ready for upload in your o
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>>> If the policy suggestion that leads to that lintian warning is so
>>> unreasonable, it might as well be taken off the policy.
>> I'm not aware of any such thing in policy
> Then maybe the linti
Joey Hess wrote:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>
>> If the policy suggestion that leads to that lintian warning is so
>> unreasonable, it might as well be taken off the policy.
>>
>
> I'm not aware of any such thing in policy
Then maybe the lintian warning could be removed.
--
BOFH excus
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> If the policy suggestion that leads to that lintian warning is so
> unreasonable, it might as well be taken off the policy.
I'm not aware of any such thing in policy.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joey Hess wrote:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>
>> If the scripts are not directly executable, you can remove the
>> #! line from them. That should make the warning go away.
>> It would be better to talk with upstream so he does that.
>>
>
> If I were upstream and was pestered by a distr
Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
>> W: : package-contains-empty-directory -- Some of these are
>> necessary (cache, assets, etc.) and some aren't (test). Can I turn
>> these off?
> Yes, add override for these.
Lintian does not warn abou
[Kjell Braden, 2008-08-05]
> > * Priority: extra - why not optional?
> Fixed
I changed Priority to extra in -dbg package and uploaded it
--
http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor
pgpohIH0VGoFY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
OoO Pendant le repas du mardi 05 août 2008, vers 19:55, Jelmer Vernooij
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> I've uploaded new versions to mentors.debian.net.
Hi Jelmer!
I have uploaded both of them.
--
BOFH excuse #172:
pseudo-user on a pseudo-terminal
pgpaIavRtg99h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Vincent,
Am Dienstag, den 05.08.2008, 18:55 +0200 schrieb Vincent Bernat:
> OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du lundi 04 août 2008, vers 22:53,
> Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> >> I think that most things in Build-Depends are not needed for the clean
> >> rule, so you ca
Hi,
> sorry for beeing late with replying. Had been a bit busy the days when
> we where on this, and forgotten it over this. Mea culpa, but just as a hint
> for
> the future: Its not bad to send a reminder after some days. After all
> people in the project are just people, so things like this may
OoO Pendant le repas du mardi 05 août 2008, vers 19:08, jaromil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
>> If you want package to be in Lenny, you should prepare an NMU
>> correcting debian/copyright to say that the manual page is also
>> licensed under GFDL with no invariant and point
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Kaido Kert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Piotr Ożarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [Kaido Kert, 2008-07-30]
>>> I have sent RFS for this package twice, and have not gotten any bit of
>>> feedback yet. Can anyone at least point me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
bonnesoir Vincent,
(i'm at GMT+7)
y merci pour l'assistance
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:35:34PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If you want package to be in Lenny, you should prepare an NMU
> correcting debian/copyright to say that
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> If the scripts are not directly executable, you can remove the
> #! line from them. That should make the warning go away.
> It would be better to talk with upstream so he does that.
If I were upstream and was pestered by a distribution to remove the
hashbang lines t
Hi,
uploaded the new package to mentors, URLs are still the same:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-otr/python-otr_0.2.1-1.dsc
> * please add python-otr-dbg package (check DPMT[1] repository for examples)
Fixed
> * Priority: extra - why not optional?
Fixed
> * please remove all
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du lundi 04 août 2008, vers 22:53,
Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
>> I think that most things in Build-Depends are not needed for the clean
>> rule, so you can move them in Build-Depends-Indep (and just keep cdbs
>> and debhelper).
> Fixed.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "twiki-ldapcontrib".
* Package name: twiki-ldapcontrib
Version : 2.99.5-1
Upstream Author : Michael Daum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Plugins/LdapContrib
* License : GNU GPL
(I am sorry, my previous mail to the list fled from my computer without my
consent ;-) Here is the full one.)
Package: clam
Description: CLAM, C++ library for audio and music
License: GPL v2 or higher
CLAM, C++ library for audio and music is a development framework for audio and
music applicati
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du mardi 05 août 2008, vers 12:29, jaromil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> i posted the following help request to debian-devel and was pointed
> out to debian-mentors. apologies to whoever received it twice now, i'm
> learning and can't browse many webpages from a v
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 02:42:59 Robert Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 21:29 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 23 juillet 2008, vers 21:37,
> >
> > Julien Lavergne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "desk
On Monday 04 August 2008 02:13:30 Ben Finney wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
--cut--
> Advice given here needs to be carefully examined for dogma, and a
> clear line needs to be maintained between "you should do this" and
> "this is one way to do it".
I'm guessing here -- Have
CLAM, C++ library for audio and music is a development framework for audio and
music applications. It provides lot of high level algorithms to analyze and
manipulate audio. They can be combined
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Hi
Dne Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:02:28 -0400
Richard Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> I am getting quite a few lintian warnings that I would like to quell.
> Do we have any best practices on how to deal with these messages?
>
> W: : debian-copyright-line-too-long -- As I understand it
> long
Hi Richard,
On Tuesday 5 August 2008 14:02, Richard Hurt wrote:
> I am getting quite a few lintian warnings that I would like to quell.
> Do we have any best practices on how to deal with these messages?
>
> W: : debian-copyright-line-too-long -- As I understand it
> long lines are now OK. I am
Richard Hurt escreveu:
W: : script-non-executable -- Since this is a scripted web
application (RoR) there are quite a few "scripts" that are not
executable directly in the shell. Can I turn this warning off for
these files?
If the scripts are not directly executable, you can remove the
#!
I am getting quite a few lintian warnings that I would like to quell.
Do we have any best practices on how to deal with these messages?
W: : debian-copyright-line-too-long -- As I understand it
long lines are now OK. I am following the new, proposed guidelines
for the copyright file (htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
re all,
i posted the following help request to debian-devel and was pointed
out to debian-mentors. apologies to whoever received it twice now, i'm
learning and can't browse many webpages from a very slow connection.
thanks for your kind help
-
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:40:19PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > One thing that I have to note also that after this standard header
> > the author writes: "For more details see the file COPYING." which is
> > the changed GPL.
>
> I would expect the
On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:43:02 +1000
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The package doesn't seem to be correctly described by this synopsis.
> The package is not a protocol; it's a PHP library.
>
> Perhaps a better synopsis would be:
>
> PHP library implementing the OAuth secure authentica
29 matches
Mail list logo
