OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du jeudi 31 juillet 2008, vers 16:08,
"Iulian Udrea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> You should not ship BitstreamVera but depends on it instead.
> I removed the fonts/ directory and added ttf-bitstream-vera to Depends
> I also updated the debian/copyri
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du mardi 29 juillet 2008, vers 17:39,
Daniel Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> The updated package can be found in the same place, on
> mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyblosxom
> - Source repository: deb-src http://
OoO En ce doux début de matinée du lundi 28 juillet 2008, vers 08:15,
Iustin Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> In the meantime, could you be kind and check at
> http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/protobuf.git that the changes you
> suggested are OK?
That's fine for me.
--
BUTT.COM IS NOT
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>
> Check the homepage[1]. Hervé: I think you should run the latest lintian
> version on your package, which would have spotted that your Homepage:
> should be moved to a proper source field, and that your
> Standards-
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Charliej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think one of the reasons he is hesitant is that the removal of "prototype"
> from the .tar.gz that he hosts would severely impact his M$ Windows users
> (he has a rather large M$ Windows community). Actually I could care le
Bleh:
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/08/2008):
> What's the advantage of paris-traceroute comparing to the old one and
> to mtr (and mtr-tiny) for example? If it does the same, or less than
> the other 2, it's usel
Hervé Rousseau wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.92-dev-2
> of my package "paris-traceroute".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> paris-traceroute - New version of well known tool traceroute
What's the advantage of paris-traceroute comparing to the ol
Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, while I wouldn't ask to remove a versioned build-dep, you could
> also argue with your reasoning that all build-dep should be versioned..
>
> I think a relatively safe requirement is to version if it needs more
> than the current stable (or perhap
Raphael Geissert wrote:
[Please respect the CoC[0] and avoid sending me copies of the message]
[0]http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Charliej wrote:
Raphael Geissert wrote:
Charliej wrote:
With that said this is a quote from my upstream:
"Whee, is this somet
Iulian Udrea wrote, On 31.07.2008 16:08:
> You should not ship BitstreamVera but depends on it instead.
>
>
> I removed the fonts/ directory and added ttf-bitstream-vera to Depends
> I also updated the debian/copyright file with the license of BitstreamVera
>
> (Hmm, I think I don't need it
[Please respect the CoC[0] and avoid sending me copies of the message]
[0]http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Charliej wrote:
> Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Charliej wrote:
>>
>>> With that said this is a quote from my upstream:
>>>
>>> "Whee, is this something you could take care
Raphael Geissert wrote:
Charliej wrote:
With that said this is a quote from my upstream:
"Whee, is this something you could take care of at install, delete and
then create a symlink. Or would this still violate this policy"
Would this be a viable solution? (I told upstream I would ask)
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:05:21PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:57:44PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:14:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > My sponsor asked me to delete versioned
Charliej wrote:
>
> With that said this is a quote from my upstream:
>
> "Whee, is this something you could take care of at install, delete and
> then create a symlink. Or would this still violate this policy"
>
> Would this be a viable solution? (I told upstream I would ask)
>
> I don't thi
Ben Finney wrote:
"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Charliej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have contacted upstream about this error, and he states that he
would not want to depend on the prototype package in debian
because he has made changes to t
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:10:54 +1000, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "Damien Raude-Morvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> libmina-java - Apache Mina - Java network application framework
>> libmina-java-doc - Apache Mina - Java network application f
Vincent Bernat wrote:
Some files are licensed under LGPLv2.1+. I suppose that upstream just
> forgot to update them but you should mention them in your
> debian/copyright. You can spot them with licensecheck. Moreover, the
> sources include bitstream font. I don't remembe
Le Wednesday 30 July 2008 23:57:44 Marc Haber, vous avez écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:14:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > My sponsor asked me to delete versioned build dependency on debhelper.
> >
> > I think this is bad advice.
>
> I
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.92-dev-2
of my package "paris-traceroute".
It builds these binary packages:
paris-traceroute - New version of well known tool traceroute
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 432606
The package c
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Piotr Ożarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Kaido Kert, 2008-07-30]
>> I have sent RFS for this package twice, and have not gotten any bit of
>> feedback yet. Can anyone at least point me to what i am missing ?
>
> I'd say it's due to this md5sum problem (.dsc fi
also sprach Stefanos Harhalakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.07.31.1216 +0200]:
> I still don't agree with that. Using debian for some time now,
> I don't believe that most descriptions follow this. Konqueror
> doesn't compare itself to Firefox, vim to emacs, alpine to mutt,
> lighttpd to apache, sbac
On Wednesday 30 July 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Stefanos Harhalakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.07.30.1345 +0200]:
> > Include a comparison of vbackup with other software in the package
> > description? Somehow I don't find this right. I believe that it is
> > a moving target that may
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> But does really an end user knows/cares about it? You are talkink
> from a developer POV, that's a little bit low-level than most of our
> users.
Someone who is looking at the changelog is getting to the lower levels
anyway. [Plus, it's not like this is pa
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:57:44PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:14:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > My sponsor asked me to delete versioned build dependency on debhelper.
> >
> > I think this is bad advice.
>
> I ag
24 matches
Mail list logo
