-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Osamu Aoki wrote:
|> Upstream Author: Yu-Chun Wang
| I see you are the upstream.
No.
I am not the upstream author. I am Wen-Yen Chuang, not Yu-Chun Wang.
| Did you check lintian?
| W: scim-array: debian-copyright-line-too-long line 3
Fixed.
It was
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.c-1
of the Debian package "ttylog", which I am adopting.
The program can be used to print everything that comes in
from a serial port to stdout. The device and the baud rate
can be specified on the command line.
It builds this bi
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libenglab".
* Package name: libenglab
Version : 0.2.2-1
Upstream Author : BugFest Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://englab.sf.net
* License : GPLv2
Section : libs
It builds these binary
"Reema Shah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In building debian packages,why do you require root privileges and
> so we have to use fakeroot..?
The manpage for 'fakeroot(1)' gives the answer:
fakeroot runs a command in an environment wherein it appears to
have root privileges for file mani
>> - Is it safe to do as I have done in debian/origCleaner.sh (using one
>> more parameter than uscan passes to tell set the tempdir from
>> get-orgi-source) or do I risk that uscan adds parameters without
>> notice? (If adding is the only risk I could pass the tempdir by the
>> second parameter in
OoO En ce début de soirée du lundi 21 juillet 2008, vers 21:11, Richard
Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> Should I just combine the similar (same person) copyrights into a
> single one covering all the years or am I supposed to list each one
> separately?
Personnaly, I would merge them.
> Als
OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du lundi 21 juillet 2008, vers 20:58,
Vincent Legout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> I'm away for two weeks. I won't be able to answer.
I have uploaded your package. Thanks for your contribution!
--
Avoid multiple exits from loops.
- The Elements of
After spending a bit of time with "licensecheck" and a some command
line friends I now have a debian/copyright file that conforms to the
proposed CopyrightFormat. The problem is that weighing in @ 388
lines, it is huge! It turns out that while most of the files in
redmine are GPL they hav
Vincent Bernat a écrit :
> OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du mardi 08 juillet 2008, vers 09:54,
> Vincent Legout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
>
>> * Package name: gimmix
>> Version : 0.4.3-1
>> Upstream Author : Priyank M. Gosalia
>> * URL : http://gimmix.berlios.
On Mon Jul 21 00:57, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> I've just uploaded a new version to mentors.debian.net, you should dget that.
>
Looks good, I've uploaded
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon Jul 21 14:37, Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik wrote:
> By the way, should the copyright text from dh_helper be included in
> debian/rules like it is now? (Lintian did not warn me about it so I
> assumed it was OK)
Yeah, that's fine, and possibly required.
> - Is it safe to do as I have done in debia
On 07/21/2008 03:20 PM, Richard Hurt wrote :
> OK, I am attempting to package up redmine and need some general
> pointers. I'm going through the New Maintainers Guide tutorial and have
> run into a few things that I need clarification on.
>
> 1) Is there any type of automated way to extract licen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Hurt wrote:
> OK, I am attempting to package up redmine and need some general
> pointers. I'm going through the New Maintainers Guide tutorial and have
> run into a few things that I need clarification on.
>
> 1) Is there any type of automate
OK, I am attempting to package up redmine and need some general
pointers. I'm going through the New Maintainers Guide tutorial and
have run into a few things that I need clarification on.
1) Is there any type of automated way to extract license info from a
series of files? I am using a si
Hello!
Thank you for your feedback.
> I've had a look at this and it looks pretty good, except you have:
>
> Suggests: nanoxml2-doc
>
> but the package name is libnanoxml2-java-doc.
>
Fixed.
By the way, should the copyright text from dh_helper be included in
debian/rules like it is now? (Lintia
Hi,
I am looking for sponsors to upload new upstream versions of sclapp and
pytagsfs. These updates build the following binary packages (with the said
changes):
python-sclapp (0.5.2-1) - framework for Python command-line applications
* New upstream release
+ sclapp.txt is now licensed u
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:06:27AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> In License, you have:
> LGPL-2+ can also be treated as version 2.1 of GNU Lesser General Public
> License. On Debian systems, the complete text may be found in
> /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1.
>
> LGPL-2+ can also be treated as ve
On Fri Jul 18 04:25, Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libnanoxml2-java/libnanoxml2-java_2.2.3.dfsg-1.dsc
>
I've had a look at this and it looks pretty good, except you have:
Suggests: nanoxml2-doc
but the package name is libnanoxml2-java-doc.
Other th
* Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080721 09:25]:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Reema Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In building debian packages,why do you require root privileges and so we
> > have to use fakeroot..?
>
> fakeroot is not necessary now with new dpkg.
Reading through t
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Reema Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In building debian packages,why do you require root privileges and so we
> have to use fakeroot..?
fakeroot is not necessary now with new dpkg.
--
Cheers,
Kartik Mistry | 0xD1028C8D | IRC: kart_
Blogs: {ftbfs,kartikm}.w
20 matches
Mail list logo
