> Original Message
> Subject: Re: font policy changes
> From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, July 13, 2008 10:13 pm
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-mentors@lists.debian.org,
> "Anthony Fok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 3) Even if "mkfontdir" were invoked directly or if it's okay to give
> "update-fonts-dir" an absolute path (in which case its man page needs to
> be updated and the warning removed), isn't it also advisable to run
> "xset fp rehash" in postinst and postrm scripts? That
Hi
2008/7/11 Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (11/07/2008):
>> checking for libnet_build_ip in -lnet... no
>>
>>ERROR! Libnet library not found, go get it from
>>http://www.packetfactory.net/projects/libnet/
>>or use the --with-libnet-* options,
I am wrapping up the Debian packages (font + sources + binary utilities
package) for the GNU Unifont. I believe that some things in the Debian
Policy Manual version 3.8.0.1, 2008-06-05, concerning fonts are
outdated. Comments and suggestions are welcome. I'm running the stable
Etch 4.0r3 release
"W. van den Akker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> libdgtnix-1-9 - Libraries for using DGT chess board
> libdgtnix-dev - Development libraries dgtnix POSIX driver DGT chess board
The package synopsis should be treated as a clause within a sentence,
and should not be capitalised like the beginning o
"W. van den Akker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> dgtdrv - Posix driver for the DGT chess board
POSIX is usually treated as an initialism, so should be spelled in
all-capitals. A better synopsis would be:
POSIX driver for the DGT chess board
Could you please send another RFS with the ful
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libdgtnix".
* Package name: libdgtnix
Version : 1-9-1
Upstream Author : Pierre Boulenguez
* URL : http://dgtnix.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL v2
Section : libs
It builds these binary packages
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dgtdrv".
* Package name: dgtdrv
Version : 1.18-1
Upstream Author : Alexander Wagner
* URL : http://dgtdrv.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL v2
Section : games
It builds these binary packages:
dgt
Sofern Sie unsere wichtige Email nicht lesen können, senden Sie uns bitte
eine Mail mit der Betreffzeile "Interesse" und Angabe Ihrer vollstaendigen
Kontaktdaten an die Absendermailadresse. Ihre bei uns hinterlegte Email
lautet: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I updated the enet library to the latest upstream release (1.2). As
this is my first work on a library package, I would be glad for some
comments.
Upstream added new members in the middle of structs that are part of the
public API, so the new release breaks binary compatibility. I did bump
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "protobuf".
* Package name: protobuf
Version : 2.0.0~b-1
Upstream Author : Google Inc.
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/
* License : Apache-2
Section : devel
It builds these binary
On Sunday 13 July 2008 18:30:34 Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> > > * In the same section there is a note:
> > > "Note: dpkg-source expects the source tree to have all patches
> > > applied when you generate the source package. This is not the
> > > case when the source tre
> > * In the same section there is a note:
> > "Note: dpkg-source expects the source tree to have all patches
> > applied when you generate the source package. This is not the
> > case when the source tree has been obtained by unpacking a
> > source package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2a-4
of my package "html2text".
It builds these binary packages:
html2text - advanced HTML to text converter
The package is "lintian -ivI" clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 255
El Friday 11 July 2008 22:03:04 Vincent Bernat escribió:
> OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du vendredi 11 juillet 2008, vers 16:21,
> Noel David Torres Taño <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
>
> > I've adopted wmaker-data which was Orphaned, and adapted it to actual
> > Policy. It's in mentors.debian
El Friday 11 July 2008 21:57:13 Serafeim Zanikolas escribió:
> Hi Noel,
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 04:21:03PM +0200, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> > Hello all:
> >
> > I've adopted wmaker-data which was Orphaned, and adapted it to actual
> > Policy. It's in mentors.debian.net but it seems that
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now, you have two kinds of diff.gz - hooligan ones which directly
> modify upstream files when applied as one fat, monolitic and
> illogical changeset, and such that create logically separated diffs
> in debian/patches/ which are then applied build time
On Sunday 13 July 2008 13:10:24 Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Hello,
Hello,
> I am trying to understand the new dpkg-source format 3.0 (quilt).
> There are two points in the documentation (man-page) I do not
> understand:
> * In the section "Building" of the description of 3.0 (quilt) it
>
Hello,
I am trying to understand the new dpkg-source format 3.0 (quilt).
There are two points in the documentation (man-page) I do not
understand:
* In the section "Building" of the description of 3.0 (quilt) it
is stated:
"The updated debian directory and the list of
19 matches
Mail list logo
