RFS: kita2

2008-07-12 Thread Hiroyuki Yamamoto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kita2". * Package name: kita2 ITP: 488488 Version: 1.90.2.2-1 Upstream Author: Hideki Ikemoto * URL: http://kita.sourceforge.jp/ * License: The MIT License Section: net Language: Rub

Re: RFS: quick-lounge-applet (updated package)

2008-07-12 Thread Diego Fernández Durán
Description fixed. Version 2.12.5-2 can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/quick-lounge-applet El dom, 13-07-2008 a las 09:01 +1000, Ben Finney escribió: > Diego Fernández Durán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > quick-lounge-applet - GNOME 2 Panel Applet to organize your

Re: RFS: quick-lounge-applet (updated package)

2008-07-12 Thread Ben Finney
Diego Fernández Durán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > quick-lounge-applet - GNOME 2 Panel Applet to organize your preferred > applications GNOME 1 will not be in lenny, and GNOME 3 doesn't exist. No need to specify version 2. No need to Capitalise Normal Words in Package Synopsis. Is "panel apple

Re: I adopted a package but nobody seems to want to upload it

2008-07-12 Thread Ben Finney
Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not impressed: I checked the version in etch. Impressive. -- \ “Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?” “Well, I think | `\ so, Brain, but it's a miracle that this one grew back.” —_Pinky | _o__)

RFS: kjv-bible-webapp

2008-07-12 Thread Brian
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kjv-bible-webapp". * Package name: kjv-bible-webapp Version : 1.1-1 Upstream Author : Brian Gunlogson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/kjvbible * License : AGPL (GNU Affero GPL)

RFS: quick-lounge-applet (updated package)

2008-07-12 Thread Diego Fernández Durán
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.12.5-1 of my package "quick-lounge-applet". It builds these binary packages: quick-lounge-applet - GNOME 2 Panel Applet to organize your preferred applications The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on me

Re: [DONE] Re: RFS: remind (updated package)

2008-07-12 Thread Kurt B. Kaiser
On Fri, Jul 11 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > Uploaded. Thanks for your work on this package. Thanks for catching the Standards Version in the changelog, and thanks for the upload! -- KBK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM

Re: I adopted a package but nobody seems to want to upload it

2008-07-12 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Dmitry, On Saturday 12 July 2008 14:34, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > HL> I'm not impressed. > HL> $ lintian wmaker-data_0.8-2.1.dsc I'm not impressed: I checked the version in etch. > uploaded version contains only one warning: You're right, sorry. regards & apologies, Holger pgp

RFS: esteidutil

2008-07-12 Thread Kaido Kert
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "esteidutil". * Package name: esteidutil Version : 0.9.17-2 Upstream Author : Kaido Kert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://esteidutil.sourceforge.net * License : BSD Section : utils It builds t

Re: I adopted a package but nobody seems to want to upload it

2008-07-12 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Dmitry E. Oboukhov ha scritto: > $ lintian -so wmaker-data_0.8-3_i386.changes > W: wmaker-data source: native-package-with-dash-version > > for adopt-upload, it is normally, I think :) Why? I don't understand relation with adopt-upload. wmaker-data isn't a native-package, so it should have an .

Re: I adopted a package but nobody seems to want to upload it

2008-07-12 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
On 13:36 Sat 12 Jul , Holger Levsen wrote: HL> Hi, HL> On Saturday 12 July 2008 03:19, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: HL> > wmaker-data was uploaded by Dmitry E. Oboukhov HL> I'm not impressed. HL> $ lintian wmaker-data_0.8-2.1.dsc uploaded version contains only one warning: $ lintian -so

Re: I adopted a package but nobody seems to want to upload it

2008-07-12 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Saturday 12 July 2008 03:19, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > wmaker-data was uploaded by Dmitry E. Oboukhov I'm not impressed. $ lintian wmaker-data_0.8-2.1.dsc W: wmaker-data source: debian-rules-sets-DH_COMPAT line 8 W: wmaker-data source: package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-vers

Re: RFS: dict-foldoc (adopted package)

2008-07-12 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 06:03:14PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Iustin Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > dict-foldoc - FOLDOC Dictionary Database > > No need to Capitalise Ordinary Words in the Package Synopsis. A better > synopsis would be: > > FOLDOC dictionary database Thanks, fixed an

Re: RFS: dict-foldoc (adopted package)

2008-07-12 Thread Ben Finney
Iustin Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > dict-foldoc - FOLDOC Dictionary Database No need to Capitalise Ordinary Words in the Package Synopsis. A better synopsis would be: FOLDOC dictionary database -- \ “‘Did you sleep well?’ ‘No, I made a couple of mistakes.’” | `\

RFS: dict-foldoc (adopted package)

2008-07-12 Thread Iustin Pop
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20080708-1 of the package "dict-foldoc". With this version, I'm adopting this orphaned package (see #461565); the reason for orphaning by the QA team was an inactive maintainer. It builds these binary packages: dict-foldoc - FOLDOC Dic